topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday March 28, 2024, 1:25 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mistercz [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1]
1
Thanks for stoping by. This seems to be resolved on the homepage but I still encounter this redirection issue when visiting the forum (Here for example: Board index » System Explorer » SystemExplorer - Development » Minor Nit).
There must be something wrong. What internet browser do you use ? There are flash ads on forum, but no redirection. User must click to banner for navigating to ads address. Could you please write more details about this issue ?

Also, is Systemexplorer a private project? I ask this because I noticed some files are hosted @ http://se.xacti.com/se/beta/.
SystemExplorer is private project. Download count of SystemExplorer 1.4 was too high for our hosting provider. So, we must have files for download hosted on some alternative download server. XACTI is hosting our files for free.

2
2PhilB66: I tried add some ads to our System Explorer homepage. Your visit was maybe on same time as maintainance of my homepage. Sorry for problems.

3
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: March 07, 2008, 05:08 AM »
New version of System Explorer was released! Feel free to visit product homepage at http://systemexplorer.mistergroup.org.

4
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 23, 2008, 12:44 AM »
I did notice that some applications that are definitely safe are shown as "Suspicious" or "Very Suspicious".  As for how else to determine a proper score, I have no idea how to do that.  However other explorer/system info programs don't designate these as Suspicious.
The every safe process should have informations about developer or product. That's why are processes without this informations marked as "suspicious"..

There's many safe application without this informations in real world, but I hope it will change.

We want to improve this feature in future versions..maybe add black list of malware processes...

5
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 22, 2008, 01:02 PM »
What kind of method are you using to determine the safety of a given file? Checking up if certain details are present in the file (name of the product, developer...), or something more complex?

There are few basic rules in actual version. Will be improved in future.

Rules:
1) Process running from %windir%\system32 with no Company Name or no Product Name has 0%
2) Process without Sign Certificate -10%
3) Process without Company Name -20%
4) Process without Product Name -20%

If you have any suggestions, Let me know. Thanks

6
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 22, 2008, 09:12 AM »
Oh, at the bottom of the config.ini file, just after the lastVersionCheck= line there's this [user_xxxxxxxxxx] number. What is it for?
This is section for user specific settings. The xxxx number is hash of user SID.
If you want to have same settings for all users, you can enable "Use One Settings for All Users" in System Explorer 1.4 Menu>Options.  Note: SE 1.4 is still in beta version only.

Yes, I think you should let the user decide if he wants to check for updates manually or go for the autocheck for new version mechanism.
OK will be added to next version.

7
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 22, 2008, 08:57 AM »
How do I disable the auto versioncheck?
System Explorer has new version checking feature. New version is checked once per day. First check is processed after 24 hours from first start of System Explorer. If exists major update, user is notified about it once. There's no automatic download. User must download new version manualy.

There's no option to disable this feature in actual version. Should we add it ?

Also, why the assignment of a user_ id number?
I don't understand, could you please explain it ?

8
General Software Discussion / Re: Another System Explorer
« on: February 22, 2008, 08:29 AM »
....System Explorer is cycling between 7 and 11% of my CPU.  This makes it comparable to Task Manager and certainly better than WinTasks Pro or Process Explorer, but be warned: like other such apps, there will be a price to be paid if you leave it running in your tray!

Hi, I'm developer of the System Explorer. We will try to reduce CPU usage in the next version of SE.
If you have any suggestions or bug reports, feel free to visit our forum at http://forum.mistergroup.org.

Best Regards,
System Explorer Developer

Pages: [1]