Can you re-download the new version and let me know if i fixed it?Now I get nice positive values in the message, great :up:-mouser (January 03, 2014, 03:00 AM)
Well I had thought that PaleMoon/Firefox "had solved the memory leaks". Apparently according to piglet, not exactly.
Can someone explain what the browser is *doing* with all that space? You can go to some random webpage (not even a video) and all of a sudden it spikes!-TaoPhoenix (January 03, 2014, 02:54 PM)
Hmm. "...And then does this a few times without compacting."
Maybe. But then I'd wish the browsers would do their own compacting and go "back down" to a sensible size. I guess it's a vestige bit of being a luddite where I just hate to see "huge" memory usages for viewing what should be a "simple" web page. Maybe the Plugins get involved too.
Update:
I still don't like seeing 416 megs used, but I have spotted a "process Palemoon.exe has gracefully lowered its memory use" message!-TaoPhoenix (January 03, 2014, 04:15 PM)
Hmm. "...And then does this a few times without compacting."
Maybe. But then I'd wish the browsers would do their own compacting and go "back down" to a sensible size. I guess it's a vestige bit of being a luddite where I just hate to see "huge" memory usages for viewing what should be a "simple" web page. Maybe the Plugins get involved too.
Update:
I still don't like seeing 416 megs used, but I have spotted a "process Palemoon.exe has gracefully lowered its memory use" message!-TaoPhoenix (January 03, 2014, 04:15 PM)
Garbage collection is very processor intensive in many cases. So you'd get into a position where your browser was regularly slowing down your machine rather than just appearing to use a lot of memory.-wraith808 (January 03, 2014, 05:07 PM)
Is the memory being reported the WS Private or the WS Sharable?
A good explanation that goes into it better than I can: http://cybernetnews.com/c...s-memory-usage-explained/
Some of all this does matter though, because I have an older laptop with only 500ish megs of ram! So I def see performance lags on that laptop, so if the browser is using that all by itself, then the laptop might be desperately caching to keep up.-TaoPhoenix (January 03, 2014, 06:27 PM)
It might be good to include a summary of memory usage and perhaps links to a couple of non-technical (or less technical) explanations, so that people that download that don't have an idea of how memory work have a better idea of how to use process piglet.
... MS Sec Essentials is usually the one that gets out of hand for me, but it's an AntiVirus so I don't know what I can really do about it except let it do its thing.You might try to find out if MS Security Essentials is using a lot of memory scanning a particular process. If so, and if you are sure that process is safe, you could try excluding it from MSE scans (go to MSE settings > Excluded Processes).-TaoPhoenix (January 02, 2014, 08:21 AM)
It should; it does here.
One thing to remember is that when piglet starts up it checks the memory use of these processes, and thereafter reports when they grow significantly beyond their initial memory use.
If that doesn't clarify the issue, give me some more details regarding what you think it should be doing and what it isn't doing.-mouser (January 16, 2014, 02:01 AM)
There are plenty of more sophisticated ways of monitoring RAM use, but Process Piglet is still a likeable tool, easy to use and very configurable. If you're having system resource issues and want to track what applications are doing over time, then we'd give it a try.
A higher limit to what?-mouser (May 20, 2014, 01:05 AM)
I had completely forgotten about, or had not noticed that - NANY 2014 Release: Process Piglet (https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=36915.msg345672#msg345672).
Looks quite handy anyway.
By the way, that's an interesting introductory video you made for it @mouser - thanks.
I'd be keen to see it merged with Process Tamer like you suggest though.-IainB (July 16, 2015, 12:08 PM)