But it's not google, so who cares? :)-f0dder (July 28, 2008, 11:02 AM)
Also comparing search results to google is not very scientific either. Google search results are irrelevant anyways. There is no "industry standard" results database.-kartal (July 28, 2008, 10:49 PM)
So yes I will use Cuil.So just like that, somebody offers a product and you jump right on board? I've got a bridge you might be interested in, too.-kartal (July 28, 2008, 10:49 PM)
So yes I will use Cuil.So just like that, somebody offers a product and you jump right on board? I've got a bridge you might be interested in, too.-kartal (July 28, 2008, 10:49 PM)
Frankly, I disbelieve you. I'll bet you an image of a $20 bill that if asked a week from now, you will not be using cuil.-CWuestefeld (July 29, 2008, 05:11 AM)
Plus this level of "unregulated" sophisticated tracking (email, search, maps, calenders, sheets, rss reader etc) is a form of invasion of pricacy.That's quite a stretch. How can you use the term "invasion"? They're not coming and taking any of your information, secret or otherwise. You are going to their site and offering it to them.-kartal (July 29, 2008, 11:40 AM)
Consumer habits also creates innovation by forcing companies to change their market game.This is quite true. And while I disagree with you, I applaud whole-heartedly your conviction if you actually put your behavior where your mouth is.-kartal (July 29, 2008, 11:40 AM)
This is quite true. And while I disagree with you, I applaud whole-heartedly your conviction if you actually put your behavior where your mouth is.-CWuestefeld (July 29, 2008, 01:03 PM)
But the level of negativity and pro google comments sounded little childish to me :) First of all the engine has just launched other day. I would ask you to refresh your memory about when google came out. Probably Cuil`s results are better than Google`s first day results. It takes time to create sensible results.-kartal (July 29, 2008, 11:40 AM)
As I said, I do remember when Google launched (with rather less publicity that Cuil have managed) and it was a better search engine from the beginning. That's why it was able to grow so quickly.-Dormouse (July 29, 2008, 06:28 PM)
Second, I am not jumping on every product on the market. But the level of negativity and pro google comments sounded little childish to me-kartal (July 29, 2008, 11:40 AM)
It looks like they have investment and marketing power. We can determine this by seeing amount of hype created around its name and superior skills.True - but they'll need huge amounts of money and time now to overcome this sort of joke/opinion - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/01/cuil_apology/-kartal (July 29, 2008, 11:46 PM)
...I'd just like to take a moment to clairify that I was not masturbating in any of the search engine test results mentioned (in my post) above ... and it is/will only be the search engine that I intend to play with...It looks like they have investment and marketing power. We can determine this by seeing amount of hype created around its name and superior skills.True - but they'll need huge amounts of money and time now to overcome this sort of joke/opinion - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/01/cuil_apology/-kartal (July 29, 2008, 11:46 PM)-Dormouse (August 02, 2008, 11:59 AM)