It's you, Tim. :P-skwire (January 07, 2011, 05:07 PM)
I'd like to see a new badger each year, so we can collect them like the mugs (bears/thongs)-timns (January 07, 2011, 05:31 PM)
I'd like to see a new badger each year, so we can collect them like the mugs (bears/thongs)-timns (January 07, 2011, 05:31 PM)
OK, I'm making a closet apple fan badge. Sorry, didn't mean to hijack...I just remembered.-superboyac (January 07, 2011, 08:35 PM)
I know, wouldn't it?! I can't find any images in my clipart at the moment. I don't want to make a big project out of it, but knowing myself I will. It will happen...OK, I'm making a closet apple fan badge. Sorry, didn't mean to hijack...I just remembered.-superboyac (January 07, 2011, 08:35 PM)
If you could make it an apple peeking out of a closet that would be hilarious...-wraith808 (January 07, 2011, 08:41 PM)
You can go through the screencast post thingies of the previous years to get a full list, right?-worstje (January 07, 2011, 08:35 PM)
I'd like to see a new badger each year, so we can collect them like the mugs (bears/thongs)-timns (January 07, 2011, 05:31 PM)-cranioscopical (January 07, 2011, 07:14 PM)
Aargh. Well there's probably some Freudian reason why I made that typo :-[Freud day was yesterday. You should try that NANY thing that someone entered this year. What was that now… hmmm… oh yes, Auspex 8)-timns (January 08, 2011, 07:00 AM)
now i just have to figure out an easy way to build a list of what users were in what NANY's..-mouser (January 14, 2011, 03:45 PM)
nah, there has to be an easier way.-mouser (January 14, 2011, 03:55 PM)
Will each one look different at some point? Colour-coded? Renumbered?yes, both. soon.
NANY 2011: New Apps for the New Year 2010 Participant-https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?action=badges;show=nany2011
Cool.
But what's this?NANY 2011: New Apps for the New Year 2010 Participant-https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?action=badges;show=nany2011-Deozaan (January 15, 2011, 06:05 AM)
Cool.
But what's this?NANY 2011: New Apps for the New Year 2010 Participant-https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?action=badges;show=nany2011-Deozaan (January 15, 2011, 06:05 AM)
Standard NANY confusion :D-Perry Mowbray (January 15, 2011, 06:50 AM)
If the year went where the 01 now is, you would actually be able to read the year.yes that is exactly what we will be doing -- and coloring each year differently.
If the year went where the 01 now is, you would actually be able to read the year.yes that is exactly what we will be doing -- and coloring each year differently.-mouser (January 15, 2011, 01:43 PM)
Now I'm doubly sad at the years I missed.-wraith808 (January 15, 2011, 07:18 PM)
I think I'll start on a NANY 2011 release now... :)-wraith808 (January 15, 2011, 07:18 PM)
2012 is the next one :huh:-mouser (January 15, 2011, 11:06 PM)
I'll chime in here and cast my vote for...
No color distinction.-CodeTRUCKER (January 16, 2011, 03:14 PM)
I maybe would wonder about having a different colour for Entrant and Admin (/and maybe volunteer)... I know from this year where my NANY entry was a miserable failure (as far as completing goes), and it would be nice not to have that confusion in the badges.-Perry Mowbray (January 16, 2011, 04:04 PM)
Same colour keeps some visual conformity...
just a suggestion for the small icons/badges.
using DC's blue gradient bar for the idea.
(see attachment in previous post (https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=25146.msg232227#msg232227))-nudone (January 16, 2011, 04:28 PM)
...
that's why i was voting for dif colors -- just to break up the monotony. maybe if they were all in same family -- like pastels.
i think the other reason, besides just the aesthetic niceness of seeing not just a row of the same icons, would be that it kind of helps identify the group -- ie the orange nany badges all participated in the same nany, etc.
...-mouser (January 16, 2011, 04:24 PM)
i prefer hamradio's badge style to the gradient.. i think at that small resolution it just looks cleaner.-mouser (January 16, 2011, 04:56 PM)
...
I maybe would wonder about having a different colour for Entrant and Admin (/and maybe volunteer)... I know from this year where my NANY entry was a miserable failure (as far as completing goes), and it would be nice not to have that confusion in the badges.-Perry Mowbray (January 16, 2011, 04:04 PM)
i prefer hamradio's badge style to the gradient.. i think at that small resolution it just looks cleaner.-mouser (January 16, 2011, 04:56 PM)
I prefer the old style (is that hamradio's?) as it is very iconic and simply breathes nany to me. It is styleful and as much an identity of NANY as Cody is of DoCo.-worstje (January 16, 2011, 07:59 PM)
The idea of different colors per year is great, and I think different shades per entry status are also great. However, I don't think we need an 'admin' badge since they're unattainable for most people. After all mouser is already in a category of his own, no need to add 6 more. ;) Likewise, the 'helper' is a bit unclear as to what it would mean. Helping organise? Helping bug test apps? Etc.
However, I think two badges per year should be the total top ever. One for entrants, and one for 'alternative participants'. I haven't got much of a clue for it, but the idea is that app writers can simply nominate people who made a useful contribution to their app (beta testing, etc) and that these people deserve this badge.-worstje (January 16, 2011, 07:59 PM)
I was thinking that the number of times you participated in NANY might be considered more important than which year it happened in. Maybe what you could try is to provide two badges. One to indicate you participated either in any NANY - or possibly just the most recent. The second badge could then have a changeable numeric element to acknowledge the times someone's participated. Doing it this way eliminates the need for a multiple badges to show the same thing.+1
As long as there's a "Hall of Fame" of Honor Roll type page with the names and the years of participation, anybody who wanted could just look it up if they were that interested.
But again, I don't think it's so important what year somebody did NANY. IMO what's important is the fact someone did it at all. And additional distinction comes from how many times the effort was repeated.
Just thinking out loud.-40hz (January 16, 2011, 08:41 PM)
The second badge could then have a changeable numeric element to acknowledge the times someone's participated.
The second badge could then have a changeable numeric element to acknowledge the times someone's participated.
that's an interesting idea, and feasible. though i think just one nany badge in that case, with a number indicating how many times you've participated.-mouser (January 16, 2011, 08:55 PM)
The second badge could then have a changeable numeric element to acknowledge the times someone's participated.
that's an interesting idea, and feasible. though i think just one nany badge in that case, with a number indicating how many times you've participated.-mouser (January 16, 2011, 08:55 PM)
ham is working on the badges now -- i vote for ONE small 16x16 badge showing the # of NANY's you've participated in, and then on your profile and on the badge listing page, it will show one for each year. i can implement this easily and i think it will reduce clutter on the posts pages (like this one).-mouser (January 19, 2011, 11:59 PM)
Page showing number of entries should sort from the highest number to the lowest
Page showing year of entry should sort from current year backwards
So does the number represent how many years someone has participated? Or how many entries?-timns (January 20, 2011, 05:45 PM)
What about 5 NANY badges? Lose the x and uppercase the acronym!
What about 5 NANY badges? Lose the x and uppercase the acronym!
done.-mouser (January 20, 2011, 06:09 PM)
This whole badge thing is unfair. it's totally programmer-biased. I'll take any badge I can get. How about an ass badge? I think I'm pretty exceptional at being an ass.-superboyac (January 20, 2011, 05:36 PM)
Back to the nursery with the anonymous nany!-cranioscopical (January 20, 2011, 05:37 PM)
This whole badge thing is unfair. it's totally programmer-biased. I'll take any badge I can get. How about an ass badge? I think I'm pretty exceptional at being an ass.-superboyac (January 20, 2011, 05:36 PM)
Do you use Linux in any capacity? If so, you can add that badge to your profile yourself. Or, you can draw a picture of Cody and get a Cody badge. :D-skwire (January 20, 2011, 06:49 PM)
Hmmm... my first impression on seeing them was "very nice!" Then the digits, "01," "03" and the "05" on the badges provoked an instinctive perception the digits were "years."-CodeTRUCKER (January 20, 2011, 05:35 PM)
If we're simply counting, it should be number of apps, but I would say that :P-timns (January 20, 2011, 06:16 PM)
if you click on a user, you go to their profile page, which then lists each YEAR's badge.-mouser (January 20, 2011, 08:31 PM)
Hmmm... my first impression on seeing them was "very nice!" Then the digits, "01," "03" and the "05" on the badges provoked an instinctive perception the digits were "years."
Maybe we could consider just single digits "1," "3" and the "5" centered in the lower portion?-CodeTRUCKER (January 20, 2011, 05:35 PM)
just another idea. display the number (whatever it may mean) using "pegs"...-nudone
Thank you.
You will be glad to know that the "pegs" icon is version 2. The first icon used "pegs" each with an area of 1 pixel by 1 pixel. This new improved version has pegs with an over generous 2 x 2 pixel area.
I always say it's worth going that extra pixel, erm, i mean extra mile, for those that appreciate it.-nudone (January 21, 2011, 07:06 AM)
it's a special magic icon that will display all the NANY information you wish to see.
focus your eyes here --> <-- and wait for the magic to appear.-nudone (January 21, 2011, 09:10 AM)
Would that be the "next" NANY badge?
(see attachment in previous post (https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=25146.msg232980#msg232980))
I always thought those colors screamed: Fisher-Price!!! ;)-40hz (January 20, 2011, 06:56 PM)
focus your eyes here --> <-- and wait for the magic to appear.-nudone (January 21, 2011, 09:10 AM)
You need to keep staring at it a little longer. When your eyes look like this -_- then all will be revealed (in your dreams that is).-nudone (January 21, 2011, 10:59 AM)
You need to keep staring at it a little longer. When your eyes look like this -_- then all will be revealed (in your dreams that is).-nudone (January 21, 2011, 10:59 AM)
Ah, we need to go deeper :D-timns (January 21, 2011, 11:09 AM)