Topics - Renegade [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 201next
86
Living Room / Facebook alternative - Tsu
« on: December 10, 2014, 11:21 PM »
I came across this site and figured it might be of some interest to people. Check the FAQ. They run things very differently compared to Facebook.

https://www.tsu.co/faq

Here's an invitation link:

https://www.tsu.co/RenegadeAnarchist

You need an invitation to join.

They run ads, but pay out 90% of ad revenue to users.

87
This is just hilarious. Target and K-mart removed GTA V from the shelves in Australia after caving in to a petition about the game.

Now, there's a petition to remove Super Mario Bros.

https://www.change.org/p/target-target-australia-must-remove-all-super-mario-bros-games-from-sale/share?just_signed=true


Target Australia Must Remove All Super Mario Bros Games From Sale


Target Australia have shown that they, and their consumers, have the power to remove products from sale, especially video games, that are potentially harmful to people such as improperly-parented children and those with predisposed and medically diagnosable pathological disorders.

For years, Nintendo's Super Mario Bros series of computer games have used a colourful and friendly design and simplistic, repetitive structure to deliver a strong message of willful murder of wildlife, consumption of hallucenogenic flora and collection of income without declaration of tax.

As was the case with other drug-and-murder-simulators, like Grand Theft Auto 5, Target continues to sell these products in order to turn a profit without any thought as to the long-term effects to their consumers.

Just as with GTA5, we, the consumer, have the power to send a message to the big corporations to say that we're fed up with having to monitor what out children do, or deal with extreme cases of psychological break in adults who continue to use video games as a scapegoat.

So sign this petition, and make a difference.

Here's an article about GTA V being pulled:

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/04/grand-theft-auto-5-kmart-target-pulling-game-sale?CMP=soc_567


88
Living Room / My 1-year Facebook Death-a-versary!!!
« on: December 01, 2014, 06:37 AM »
1 year ago today I killed myself off on Facebook and stopped posting entirely. No posts. No likes. No nothing. (I have been tempted, but have successfully resisted.)

Screenshot - 2014_12_01 , 11_21_43 PM.png

I'm wondering if I should do a zombie post...

Arrr... BRAINS!

Meh... maybe not.

I decided that I'm sick of the massive privacy intrusion and that I wouldn't cooperate any longer with it.

I'm not a product, and won't be sold as one.

I don't need "free" services or products. I'd rather just pay for them upfront.

I don't hate Facebook, but I just won't play that game.

Thank you for listening/reading. 8)

Feel free to join me & the virtual undead by posting your own FB obituary. ;)


89
Living Room / Rogers ISP in Canada launches MITM attacks on customers
« on: November 30, 2014, 07:34 PM »
This is rather interesting - an ISP attacking its customers:

http://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/2nv1un/rogers_still_using_content_injection_after_7/

rogers mitm.png

A security video on the topic:

http://2014.video.sector.ca/video/110367213

See 3:31 in the video for another Rogers MITM attack.

The video goes into some good depth on how the ISP is attacking customers.

Here's one good post from the Reddit thread:


This is borderline criminal. They are modifying the content of a webpage that you are accessing. They are actively injecting their code in a page that you have requesting...

It's beyond a simple gaffe... If they wanted to, they could use this to change what's written in a article from the Globe & Mail or from the CBC...

When they start doing this, there is usually no end...

Now imagine if they decided to change any comment that they find damageable to their brand on twitter or facebook or reddit...

Now imagine they changed the prices on their competitor's website (Bell, Telus) to make them look more expensive than their own...

That's why everyone should always browse the net at the least in HTTPS... Wikipedia article on HTTPS

What you need to know is that HTTPS, when activated, creates an encrypted conduit between you and the webpage you are accessing. It also minimize the amount of information your ISP can intercept when you are browsing the net.

Whenever you do your banking or buying from a reputable site, HTTPS is enabled by default. You can also browse Reddit in HTTPS mode.

Everyone here should be using HTTPS Everywhere from the good people at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. INSTALL IT !


90
Living Room / Kim Dotcom is broke - US trying to revoke bail
« on: November 30, 2014, 03:24 AM »
The infinitely deep pockets of money printers has managed to drive Kim Dotcom broke:

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/537358269283434496

Video: It's official. I'm broke. Here's a Q&A I did yesterday.



http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/11/27/2022216/kim-dotcom-says-legal-fight-has-left-him-broke

Kim Dotcom, the founder of the seized file-sharing site Megaupload, has declared himself "broke". The entrepreneur said he had spent $10m (£6.4m) on legal costs since being arrested in New Zealand in 2012 and accused of internet piracy. Mr Dotcom had employed a local law firm to fight the US's attempt to extradite him, but his defence team stepped down a fortnight ago without explaining why. Mr Dotcom said he would now represent himself at a bail hearing on Thursday. He denies charges of racketeering, conspiring to commit copyright infringement and money laundering. He told a conference in London, via a video link, that his lawyers had resigned because he had run out of money. "The [US authorities] have certainly managed to drain my resources and dehydrate me, and without lawyers I am defenceless," he said. "They used that opportunity to try and get my bail revoked and that's what I'm facing."

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30209067

The entrepreneur said he had spent $10m (£6.4m) on legal costs since being arrested in New Zealand in 2012 and accused of internet piracy.

Mr Dotcom had employed a local law firm to fight the US's attempt to extradite him, but his defence team stepped down a fortnight ago without explaining why.

Mr Dotcom said he would now represent himself at a bail hearing on Thursday.

He denies charges of racketeering, conspiring to commit copyright infringement and money laundering.

He told a conference in London, via a video link, that his lawyers had resigned because he had run out of money.

"The [US authorities] have certainly managed to drain my resources and dehydrate me, and without lawyers I am defenceless," he told the audience at the Unbound Digital event.

"They used that opportunity to try and get my bail revoked and that's what I'm facing."

The law firm Simpson Grierson, which had represented Mr Dotcom, could not be reached for comment.

Political backlash

Mr Dotcom's declaration comes seven months after he won back access to about $750,000 worth of property - including several of his cars - that had been taken at the time of his arrest. However, other assets, including dozens of bank accounts, remained frozen.


Pages: prev1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 ... 201next
Go to full version