ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

News and Reviews > Mini-Reviews by Members

Quality Comparison: 8 x freeware PDF Readers / Viewers

<< < (13/22) > >>

urlwolf:
I'm still surprised that after testing a few dozen pdf readers for linux and windows, I have to come back to adobe. The rendering quality and text selection is not good in all the alternatives. Is it really that hard to get this right? It must be. I hate to admit I need adobe: their software is horrible resource-wise.

Darwin:
I hate to admit I need adobe: their software is horrible resource-wise.
-urlwolf (July 29, 2008, 08:40 AM)
--- End quote ---

I'm more insulted by the implied effect that Adobe products will have on my wallet...

urlwolf:
foxit seems to have improved a lot.
Highlighting text/marking got more precise. It doesn't get fooled by 2-column papers.
You can pay for the features you need. It's small, and portable. Rendering is quite ok actually. I think I'll keep it as my default for a while.

Plus it has tabs! go foxit!
Anyone else up for a discount?

Darwin:
Anyone else up for a discount?
-urlwolf (October 24, 2008, 01:58 PM)
--- End quote ---

ALWAYS  :Thmbsup:

J-Mac:
I'm for a try with a discount.

Jim

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version