DonationCoder.com Software > ProcessTamer
Optimization Suggestion: Adjusted Priority_Range
shmate:
Hi mouser,
Does ProcessTamer project is discontinued ?
A year ago I sent bug fixes and useful suggestion but unfortunately until now there is no any progress.
It is very frustrating :(
shmate
mouser:
See here for reason for temporary hibernation of development: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=12798.0
Steven Avery:
whether this should wait for when PT moves to a more generic per-application-rules based thing.-mouser (November 12, 2007, 12:14 AM)
--- End quote ---
Hi Folks,
This leads to my question. I have an application that does not use a lot of resources (Powermarks) that needs a higher priority to lessen the "wait-state" (memory loading ?, paging ?) when I return to the program. It seems to be helped when I make it high priority (e.g. with Process Master, which runs by application, while Actual Booster does that on a more global realm and could easily clash with Process Tamer).
So what is your recommendation ? Perhaps a limited usage of Process Master for the PowerMarks type app, combined with the normal global usage of Process Tamer ? I just want to be :
a) careful about programs that can compete against each other, perhaps clashing or crashing
b) achieve multiple ends, taming hogs on-the-fly (Process Tamer) and allowing for exceptional situations
Shalom,
Steven Avery
mouser:
Process Tamer is very happy to let you set specific priorities for specific applications -- just go to the process list and set an Explicit Rule for the program to "Force Above Normal" or whatever, and it will be remembered forever after.
shmate:
I hope this will be included the coming update
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version