ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion

Why is it so hard to find a decent image organizer?

<< < (48/65) > >>

tomos:
I think what surprises me here is the distribution of prices.
-Jibz (April 06, 2010, 09:04 AM)
--- End quote ---

I guess they charge high prices mainly cause they can - photography has been accepted as an expensive hobby where everyone wants to get 'the best'

But maybe also because workflow is very important in these apps: hence there needs to be a lot of work done on the GUI - coders hate working on GUI's & charge triple rate for that kind of work (:p and maybe it's more labour intensive too?)
-tomos (April 06, 2010, 01:18 PM)
--- End quote ---

I guess I should have added a smiley at the end of all that :)

superboyac:
Oshyan, consider trying out Photo mechanic.  People who use it say that it's handling of RAW files is amazing.

JavaJones:
Oshyan, consider trying out Photo mechanic.  People who use it say that it's handling of RAW files is amazing.
-superboyac (April 06, 2010, 02:28 PM)
--- End quote ---

Yep, it's definitely on my list after recent mention of it. Haven't had a chance to try it yet though.

- Oshyan

Dormouse:
If you are going to look at PM, you need to be very clear about what it is.

It is a browser, sorter, tagger - and it is fast.

But it isn't a raw converter, an image editor or a cataloger.

zevel:
If you are going to look at PM, you need to be very clear about what it is.

It is a browser, sorter, tagger - and it is fast.

But it isn't a raw converter, an image editor or a cataloger.
-Dormouse (April 06, 2010, 04:48 PM)
--- End quote ---

I'm confused.
What's the difference between a browser+sorter+tagger and a cataloger?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version