ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room

Tweets > 140 characters?

(1/3) > >>

MilesAhead:
There is speculation that twitter may soon allow tweets longer than 140 characters.  When contracted for comment, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey s

Curt:
s Weston, the theatrical agent.
Oh, why didn't you say so? Come on aboard. Denham's gettin' wild. I hope you've got some good news for him.
-King Kong
--- End quote ---
thinking about what it must have been like. Why don't you start at the beginning? It's always the easiest. OK, I'll start at the beginning.
-Killing Me Softly
--- End quote ---

^ sometimes a beginning is better than an end.

wraith808:
There is speculation that twitter may soon allow tweets longer than 140 characters.  When contracted for comment, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey s
-MilesAhead (October 02, 2015, 07:27 AM)
--- End quote ---

You can already do tweets > 140 characters.  You just have to use a separate service.  Which is when I start to question the format... and the disingenuous nature of it all.  After all, when people started shortening URLs, twitter decided to change their stance on it.  When people started tweeting images using other services, twitter rolled that in to have control.  I just hate when companies put limitations in or have deficiencies, others engineer a way around it... then the company swoops in after they see people want it and because they own the platform, they lock the others out.

MilesAhead:
I have never tried Twitter.  As soon as I heard about the max chars it sounded like a bunch of bumper sticker arguments were inevitable.  Not even sound bites, but sound bits.  Maybe if I had a reason to use it I would change my mind.  I tend to be too skeptical of new things.  Which reminds me, Mouser I do like the new format on here.  :)

wraith808:
I have never tried Twitter.  As soon as I heard about the max chars it sounded like a bunch of bumper sticker arguments were inevitable.  Not even sound bites, but sound bits.  Maybe if I had a reason to use it I would change my mind.  I tend to be too skeptical of new things.  Which reminds me, Mouser I do like the new format on here.  :)

-MilesAhead (October 02, 2015, 12:47 PM)
--- End quote ---

What it is supposed to be for is little bits of information that are not worthy of a standard blog format or article on a site.  Standard articles have a certain format that they use in order to increase surface area- if you want to say that Harrison Ford fell on the set of the new Star Wars movie, if you reported it on CNN.com or EW.com, you'd have a lot of fluff and filler.  In a micro blogging format, you just tweet the relevant headline.  Or you can tweet individual comments that are concise and to the point.

They first bastardized that with links to the full article- so as to redirect traffic to their sites.  Then they started with multiple tweets, or images.  And twitter became this site where people just spewed things, with no real difference from other sites- other than the hypothetical 140 character limit.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version