ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room

Please help Archive Team save Friendfeed's content

<< < (4/5) > >>

app103:
For anyone interested, you can watch the rescue in real-time, here: http://tracker.archiveteam.org/friendfeed/

Deozaan:
For anyone interested, you can watch the rescue in real-time, here: http://tracker.archiveteam.org/friendfeed/
-app103 (April 07, 2015, 03:15 PM)
--- End quote ---

No wonder I can't do anything! Kenshin is doing like a bajillion items per minute! I just keep getting messages saying things like:

"Tracker rate limiting is active. We don't want to overload the site we're archiving, so we've limited the number of downloads per minute. Retrying after 300 seconds..."

Impressive!

P.S. The first two items I did took over 10 hours each. Everything else has gone much faster. I guess I just got a couple of accounts who posted a bajillion things on their friendfeeds.

Deozaan:
Holy carp. It's virtually finished!

There are no more items on the to-do list. And there are only about 1,500 items checked out that are awaiting finalization. I suspect if they time out, Kenshin will nab them up very quickly and take care of it. Kenshin did over 70% of the total archiving!

I guess I can shut my Warrior down. There's nothing left for me to do.

:Thmbsup:

f0dder:
it's worth noting that VirtualBox will not work if you have a modified version of uxtheme.dll (which has to be modified if you want to use non-windows themes for the OS).
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13767-tomos (April 07, 2015, 04:21 AM)
--- End quote ---
Damn, that's arrogant!

wraith808:
it's worth noting that VirtualBox will not work if you have a modified version of uxtheme.dll (which has to be modified if you want to use non-windows themes for the OS).
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13767-tomos (April 07, 2015, 04:21 AM)
--- End quote ---
Damn, that's arrogant!
-f0dder (April 08, 2015, 03:26 AM)
--- End quote ---

That was my first thought, also- though I'd assume it would be possible to fork it and remove that check.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version