Home | Blog | Software | Reviews and Features | Forum | Help | Donate | About us
topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • December 10, 2016, 10:09:09 PM
  • Proudly celebrating 10 years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: Probably the single most obvious reason why DRM doesn't (and can't) work  (Read 1556 times)

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,768
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
I'm one of those people who does not condone digital piracy. Period. But by the same token, I'm smart enough to realize that attempting to "combat" it through digital rights management schemes is never going to work. Not because of technical reasons (even if that technology has so far proven itself to be ineffective at best even when not flat out broken) so much as it is for social reasons.

And because of that, the questionable claims made by frustrated digital property producers as to the calculated magnitude of their financial losses becomes all the more specious. Most of these claims seem to state (without any proof) that every copy obtained illegally directly translates to the actual loss of a sale. This is a presumption which neatly ignores the fact that many of the people who do pirate something would never buy a licensed copy - even if they had the money to do so.

But that doesn't stop companies from making projections based on that presumption. Usually it goes something like this: Well...if you take a given number of copies pirated times our MSRP, then our losses due to piracy are...

There are a couple of problems with this methodology. Lets ask a few questions:

Q: How do you know how many copies were actually "pirated?"

A: Well...if you look at the number of torrents in a given month... (translation: We pulled a number out of our ass)

Q: How do you know everybody who pirated a copy would have actually bought it had they not been able to download it for free?

A: We just know. (translation: We're so full of ourselves that we've come to believe everybody wants to own our products. So piss off!))

Q: Why do you always calculate the alleged loss using your obviously inflated MSRP?

A: Hey! That's what we charge for it on our website. And it's a fair price! If Amazon wants to cut it's own throat, who are we to tell them how to run their business? (translation: Umm...next question please?)

Q: Do you actually sell many copies on you website that way? I mean, y'know...at full list price?

A: I'm sorry. Our sales figures are proprietary information. (translation: And you can expect your ISP to get served with a DMCA takedown notice the minute your article mentioning any of this appears!)

And so it goes. It's mostly accounting projections done using questionable assumptions and methods. And as somebody with a degree in accounting, all I can say is FUBAR! I'd love to see them attempt to convince the IRS they should be allowed to claim losses on their taxes using this same logic. You'll need something much better than a hunch plus some grade school math to convince those guys you experienced a business loss that merits your being able to take a deduction for it. The IRS is a stickler for actual and provable when claiming an expense for tax purposes. :mrgreen:

But I'm talking as a businessman with an accounting background. What would a software game developer have to say about all this voodoo? Read on.

bluebaby_super-meat-boy-comic-cover-2-5.png

Super Meat Boy game developer Tommy Refenes has put his tuppence in on the topic and produced one of the best articles on what the real problem is with attempting to combat digital piracy with DRM. His conclusion: You can't prevent the loss of sales when there are no real 'lost' sales to begin with.

Some highlights:

Quote
Apathy and refunds are more dangerous than Piracy.

I think I can safely say that Super Meat Boy has been pirated at least 200,000 times. We are closing in on 2 million sales and assuming a 10% piracy to sales ratio does not seem unreasonable. As a forward thinking developer who exists in the present, I realize and accept that a pirated copy of a digital game does not equate to money being taken out of my pocket. Team Meat shows no loss in our year end totals due to piracy and neither should any other developer.

For the sake of argument, some of those people that did pirate Super Meat Boy could have bought the game if piracy didn’t exist but there is no actual way to calculate that lost revenue. It is impossible to know with certainty the intentions of people. With the SimCity fiasco and several companies trying to find new ways to combat piracy and stating piracy has negatively affected their bottom line I wonder if they’ve taken the time to accurately try to determine what their losses are due to piracy.

Quote
All loss in a retail setting is calculable because items to be sold are physical objects that come from manufacturers that have to be placed on shelves by employees. You have a chain of inventory numbers, money spent and labor spent that goes from the consumer all the way to the manufacturer. A stolen, broken, or lost item is an item that you cannot sell. In the retail world your stock is worth money.

In the digital world, you don’t have a set inventory. Your game is infinitely replicable at a negligible or zero cost (the cost bandwidth off your own site or nothing if you’re on a portal like Steam, eShop, etc). Digital inventory has no value. Your company isn’t worth an infinite amount because you have infinite copies of your game. As such, calculating worth and loss based on infinite inventory is impossible. If you have infinite stock, and someone steals one unit from that stock, you still have infinite stock. If you have infinite stock and someone steals 1 trillion units from that stock , you still have infinite stock. There is no loss of stock when you have an infinite amount.

Quote
Consumer confidence plays a very important role in how customers spend money. I think its safe to say that EA and Maxis do not have a lot of consumer confidence at this point. I think its also safe to say that the next EA/Maxis game is going to be a tough sell to people who experienced or were turned away by talk of frustration regarding SimCity.

As a result of piracy developers feel their hand is forced to implement measures to stop piracy. Often, these efforts to combat piracy only result in frustration for paying customers. I challenge a developer to show evidence that accurately shows implementation of DRM is a return on investment and that losses due to piracy can be calculated. I do not believe this is possible.

The reality is the fight against piracy equates to spending time and money combating a loss that cannot be quantified. Everyone needs to accept that piracy cannot be stopped and loss prevention is not a concept that can be applied to the digital world. Developers should focus on their paying customers and stop wasting time and money on non-paying customers. Respect your customers and they may in turn respect your efforts enough to purchase your game instead of pirating it.

Great article. Read the rest of it here.

(With a tip of the hat to TechDirt :-*  for posting a link to Mr. Refenes' blog post.  :Thmbsup:)
« Last Edit: March 21, 2013, 05:02:36 PM by 40hz »

xtabber

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
There is in fact a good case to be made that piracy can actually increase sales. 

A recent study by the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, a think tank that is part of the European Commission (can one get more establishment than that?), finds exactly that in the case of online music.

Also, Tim O'Reilly claims that removing DRM from their ebooks greatly increased sales.

Of course, this only works if what you are selling is something that people actually want to own.

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,768
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Also, Tim O'Reilly claims that removing DRM from their ebooks greatly increased sales.

I'd be very interested is seeing how they established that correlation. Is there a link to any of that?

xtabber

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
I remember reading an interview with Tim O'Reilly in which he made that claim, but I don't recall when or where it was.

But according to David Pogue, the NYTimes tech columnist, O'Reilly actually did a test with one of his titles and found that while removing DRM did increase piracy, it also increased sales of the book. 

In any case, there is no doubt that O'Reilly's anti-DRM policy has really paid off for them.  In the last year, they have picked up the distribution for ebooks from Microsoft Press and Wiley's Wrox and Dummies lines, among others.


40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,768
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
In any case, there is no doubt that O'Reilly's anti-DRM policy has really paid off for them.

Well it certainly has in my case. I don't willingly buy any media with DRM on it. And I have often declined to get e-books from some sources because of it. (That is also the main reason why I still have so much 'paper' in my tech library.) On the other hand I currently own at least a couple dozen O'Reilly e-titles. And I generally make it a point to always get the new editions whenever they come out (even if I don't really need them) precisely for that reason.

Desired behaviors need to be rewarded if we want them to continue, right? ;) 8)

Tinman57

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2006
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,702
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
  I've posted in the past that there has been many times where I couldn't even run the software that I bought and paid for because of the DRM.  I had to go to hacker sites to get the DRM-free copies.  What I found out from this is there is some software that is 60% or more DRM.  I bought a game on CD that wouldn't work.  There was almost no space left on the CD, but the downloaded DRM-free game was only about 5 mb total.  Some of these games weren't worth the time to install, crappy gameplay/graphics/etc.
  It got to the point where I was first downloading the hacked software to see if I liked it or not, then buying the legal copy and continued playing the hacked version for compatibility with my computer.

  There's been a few times where I've bought music CD's only to find one or two songs max were good, and the rest of the songs were pure crap.  I started downloading the illegal copies to see how many good songs it had before ordering/buying the CD.  Of course now we can order music by the song on the internet with samples that makes it much easier.

xtabber

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 574
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
You probably know the benefits of having an account with O'Reilly, but others may not.

Among them, the ability to add the ebook version of any of their titles you own in hard copy for an additional $4.99, and notification of updates to any of their titles you have registered with them.  Updates (e.g., from new printings) are free and new editions are typically 40%-50% off. Also, most of their titles are provided in epub, mobi and pdf format for a single purchase, so you can read them on any devices you own without jumping through hoops.

That said, I don't know that this model would work for the kind of books that people read once and discard, like popular fiction titles.

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,768
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
That said, I don't know that this model would work for the kind of books that people read once and discard, like popular fiction titles.

My GF is a big reader. She does the exact opposite. ;D She bought herself a Nook about a year ago and has been quite happy with it. She tends to read things on her Nook first. Then, if she really likes the title, she'll buy a paper copy. Which unfortunately is the exact thing the big booksellers seem to want her to stop doing.

« Last Edit: March 21, 2013, 04:58:59 PM by 40hz »

Stephen66515

  • Animated Giffer in Chief
  • Honorary Member
  • Joined in 2010
  • **
  • Posts: 3,131
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
As somebody who does pirate, and then purchases the content if it is something I want to use in the long-term...Adding DRM means I will simply continue using the pirated version...mainly cause if you add DRM, you're a dick...but mostly because it's easier.

Also...if you add "Always-Online DRM" to your shit...I would have never bought your product anyway.