ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room

Wikileaks - Julian Assange Granted Asylum by Ecuador

<< < (11/12) > >>

Renegade:
Disclaimer 2. I'm Australian, not USA-an. And I hate the way USA culture has swamped Australian culture. (If I had the power I'd ban ALL tv and USA movies from being shown here) So I'm not a rusted on pro or anti USA person
-tsaint (August 21, 2012, 05:15 PM)
--- End quote ---


Hehe! Yes, here in Australia we can certainly hear the trumpeting of the American elephant off in the jungle. But try sleeping beside the elephant! Oh, poor Canada~! :P


Whatever, to me it seems a bit like mob hysteria with all sorts of wild, fanciful claims springing up. Most of them based on half truths or rumour or someone is reported as having said instead of actual facts. With our favourite govt to hate being the witch.
-tsaint (August 21, 2012, 05:15 PM)
--- End quote ---


Make no mistake. I am not a bigot. I hate them all equally. Well, maybe not equally... but all of them anyways~! :P ;D

tomos:
Whatever, to me it seems a bit like mob hysteria with all sorts of wild, fanciful claims springing up. Most of them based on half truths or rumour or someone is reported as having said instead of actual facts. With our favourite govt to hate being the witch.-tsaint (August 21, 2012, 05:15 PM)
--- End quote ---

I agree with this. I believe that the alternative media's approach only undermines their position. They rant to the converted, and dont seem really interested in the truth which is often hidden in the details.
A problem with that is, that it allows people looking from the outside to write them off as a bunch of quacks, and to think/claim that there's no big problem. In that sense, that type of media approach contributes to the problems, rather than exposing them.

I am quick myself to take people and their sources to task for flaws and weaknesses. I find the usual black/white approach to these kind of things a weakness - on both sides.

I'll repeat: I'm no fan of Wikileaks, and I'm no fan of Assange.

And I'll finish by saying that your comparision with a your local footbal team is weak, to say the least. I'll leave it at that, cause if you believe your position, who am I to say it's wrong.

zridling:
@tsaint: "Would like a reference to where the USA govt has called for his assassination as you allege though."
Obama has not "ruled it out." Also, Senator Diane Feinstein, Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703989004575653280626335258.html  and,
http://www.salon.com/2012/07/24/dianne_feinsteins_espionage/
________________________________________________________________________
As for the NDAA, recall your Bush years and "signing statements." Obama uses them, too. Congress can pass anything, but the executive branch usually "interprets" the laws to their perversions. Politically, I'm all over the place, but probably more a socialist than anything else. Obama has already flat-out refused to turn over documents Congress subpoenaed regarding the "Fast and Furious" guns in and out of Mexico operation. And when Congress doesn't give a president what they want, there's always the Executive Order. This article details the NDAA better than I can here:

Why I’m Suing Barack Obama by Chris Hedges
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/why_im_suing_barack_obama_20120116/
_______________________________________________
Putting people in jail in the US is a for-profit business; google UNICOR.gov and CCA.com

Renegade:
Putting people in jail in the US is a for-profit business; google UNICOR.gov and CCA.com
-zridling (August 22, 2012, 05:00 AM)
--- End quote ---

Pee-laugh warning... ;)

Gotta love these taglines:





Partnership corrections? Oh, god, please! We're life changing? BWAHAHAHA~!

barney:
Putting people in jail in the US is a for-profit business; google UNICOR.gov and CCA.com
-zridling (August 22, 2012, 05:00 AM)
--- End quote ---

Pee-laugh warning... ;)

Gotta love these taglines:
 (see attachment in previous post) (see attachment in previous post)
Partnership corrections? Oh, god, please! We're life changing? BWAHAHAHA~!
-Renegade (August 22, 2012, 06:03 AM)
--- End quote ---

Well, yeah ... but those statements stand, although [probably  :-\] not with the intent of the originators.  How do you define Partnership Correction ... fifteen (15) years at Attica or Folsom?  And that would definitely be life changing, doncha thimk  :-\ :P :P?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version