DonationCoder.com Software > Finished Programs
Concerned large number/size of copy actions too burdensome for ClipTrap
nkormanik:
I'm doing some "heavy lifting" copy action, expecting ClipTrap to handle it all in stride.
(Then I'm wanting ChoppingList to nicely divide it all up for me.)
But I'm getting not-so-good results. Some copies are getting skipped, or parts are getting lost in the shuffle.
Would it be possible to write-to-disk each copy action, so as to be extra careful that all copied stuff is safely getting saved?
If the whole huge set of copies is being held in memory, I fear that it's too much for ClipTrap to handle.
The added time of program response would be a small price to pay for extra assurance.
Please give me your opinion regarding these concerns.
Thanks, though, as always, for your excellent program.
Nicholas
skwire:
The clipboard can be a fickle beast. That being said, I never really designed ClipTrap to be a heavy-duty clipboard manager. I wrote it to fill a gap between having no clipboard manager and the heavy-duty ones. If it's missing captures, I'm not sure writing the data to disk is really going to help anything, you know? How much data are you copying at a time?
nkormanik:
The application I'm focusing on is MetaStock, a stock charting program. MetaStock has no ability to allow saving a chart data to disk. If you click on a graph line, however, you can then hit Ctrl-C, and this copies the data to the clipboard.
One can then paste into Excel, for example.
The data being copied would be a time-series of numbers, say Date, Price, Volume, etc. And extend over time, daily, from the present going back perhaps ten years. That's a whopper of data.
And I'm copying many such charts at once, having everything go to ClipTrap. Then having your ChoppingList divide it all up (by way of delimiter XXXXX).
Then I import these files as needed into Excel.
nkormanik:
By the way, in this particular use (long columns of time-line data being copied) in the options should I have 'word-wrap' on or off?
Not really sure.
skwire:
I'd think that word-wrap off would be less intensive but I don't have anything to back that up.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version