Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room
NBA vetoes a trade: exposes the protection in place for large corporations
Renegade:
Easier said than done for most people.-Renegade (December 13, 2011, 10:13 PM)
--- End quote ---
This may be another thing that is lost without context. These players are rich.
-Paul Keith (December 13, 2011, 11:32 PM)
--- End quote ---
Ooops. I thought the comment was referring to regular people.
Paul Keith:
Easier said than done for most people.-Renegade (December 13, 2011, 10:13 PM)
--- End quote ---
This may be another thing that is lost without context. These players are rich.
-Paul Keith (December 13, 2011, 11:32 PM)
--- End quote ---
Ooops. I thought the comment was referring to regular people.
-Renegade (December 13, 2011, 11:56 PM)
--- End quote ---
To be fair, I was also aiming it at regular people who live in a free market society but since the free market is hijacked/considered a delusion by some, it really depends on which particular scenario wraith meant since my reply was in reply to his reply.
At the same time, this topic is about Chris Paul so yeah, I wasn't really referring to regular people at least not primarily.
Paul Keith:
Here's another quote to show how different the two situations are:
His mom has been sick since he was fighting in PRIDE, and it is not the first time he uses her condition as a way to excuse something (back then it cuased his poor performances), so now, suddendly when he is asked for a random test, his mom's condition worsens again?
Also the blood samples he submitted were taken in private so... picture me skeptic!
--- End quote ---
So basically one is an alleged steroid scandal involving taking advantage of a sickly mother.
The other is basically a trade problem with Chris Paul.
Guess which one involves more regular people. Guess which one motivates more rich people to bypass the rule.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version