Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site November 20, 2014, 02:50:04 PM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.


You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
The N.A.N.Y. Challenge 2010! Download 24 custom programs!
   
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
Pages: Prev 1 [2]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Moving up to ESET NOD32 v5  (Read 8267 times)
Stoic Joker
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 5,391



View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #25 on: November 18, 2011, 06:34:05 PM »

Why exactly does a printer driver demand access to the internet?

They don't; but it's a network printer ... and as usual the firewall doesn't make that kind of distinction. Wink
Logged
Tuxman
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,497


OMG not him again!

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #26 on: November 18, 2011, 06:44:48 PM »

Firewalls do, "firewalls" don't. Phrasing is important here! smiley
These "suits" are just like the "Windows Firewall": Not very sophisticated packet filtering, but no firewall functionality at all.
Logged

I bet when Cheetahs race and one of them cheats, the other one goes "Man, you're such a Cheetah!" and they laugh & eat a zebra or whatever.
- @VeryGrumpyCat
Stoic Joker
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 5,391



View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #27 on: November 19, 2011, 09:50:25 AM »

Firewalls do, "firewalls" don't. Phrasing is important here! smiley
These "suits" are just like the "Windows Firewall": Not very sophisticated packet filtering, but no firewall functionality at all.

Perhapps, but the functionality available in a high-end, full zoot commercial firewall isn't necessary for an end user. Sure if you have publically hosted services that get thousands of hits an hour the full on SPI/Traffic shaping/etc., etc. shenanigans are all necessary & good. But that's not the case with a typical end user.

Most sheeple just need something to sit at the edge of their machine that will say no to (basically all) incoming connection requests, because they don't want to waste time typing/remembering anything more complicated than their dogs name for a password. And the Windows firewall does this just fine (end of need).

Outbound "filtering"? ...I've never seen giving end users choices end well. They either shoot themselves in the foot blocking something necessary, or get eaten alive by something that's trying to get out. The object is to prevent hostile code from getting on the box in the first place. And one of the simplest (processor time free) methods of doing that is to use DNS filtering ...(like OpenDNS).. Which is done at the network border, and does a suprisingly good job of keeping folks away from those infected banner farm servers.

Best way to avoid getting killed in battle, is to avoid battles.  cheesy
Logged
Cloq
Charter Member
***
Posts: 250

View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #28 on: November 19, 2011, 11:36:35 AM »

I quite like interactive "Personal Firewalls". I don't like applications "phoning home" without my knowledge or consent.

I am too dumb to comprehend half the EULA's that are out there assuming they even mention that the application/installer is going be sending/receiving information/updates behind the scenes.

It's amazing that amount "crap" that various applications pre-install (think auto update programs for instance) that I would have never realized (thereby wouldn't have known to remove/delete those extra apps) without an interactive "personal firewall".

Currently I am using Eset's ESS 5 and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware Pro. They both seem to play and behave well together.

ESS seems to be weak in removing and detecting malware (realtime) and for that Malwarebytes takes over.
« Last Edit: November 19, 2011, 11:41:46 AM by Cloq » Logged
Tuxman
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,497


OMG not him again!

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #29 on: November 19, 2011, 12:19:07 PM »

It's amazing that amount "crap" that various applications pre-install (think auto update programs for instance) that I would have never realized (thereby wouldn't have known to remove/delete those extra apps) without an interactive "personal firewall".
Might sound a bit harsh, but: Use your brain. A "personal firewall" is not meant to replace your own thinking. If you don't know what an application actually installs, use snapshots of your system. If you don't want to, I can't see your actual problem with that.

Oh: ESS is not made for malware detection, it features a virus scanner, not a "potentially unwanted software" scanner. smiley
Logged

I bet when Cheetahs race and one of them cheats, the other one goes "Man, you're such a Cheetah!" and they laugh & eat a zebra or whatever.
- @VeryGrumpyCat
Cloq
Charter Member
***
Posts: 250

View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #30 on: November 19, 2011, 01:42:16 PM »

It's amazing that amount "crap" that various applications pre-install (think auto update programs for instance) that I would have never realized (thereby wouldn't have known to remove/delete those extra apps) without an interactive "personal firewall".
Might sound a bit harsh, but: Use your brain. A "personal firewall" is not meant to replace your own thinking. If you don't know what an application actually installs, use snapshots of your system. If you don't want to, I can't see your actual problem with that.

Oh: ESS is not made for malware detection, it features a virus scanner, not a "potentially unwanted software" scanner. smiley

I am not sure how your average user is suppose to know the mind of an author/programmer that is devious in hiding unwanted processes/applications on startup/installation.

What seems to a common trend now is for installations to tack on various toolbars and spyware apps. Even a few of the trusted applications that I use, the newer versions now bundle junk with it, so you have to babysit the damn install and uncheck the junk.

An interactive personal firewall is useful as a first line of defense, it can alert the user that some app wanting out.

ESS like many other antivirus (started off as) programs are now trying to throw in the kitchen sink with their program so they try to be a jack of all trades in that area but are not always successful in every field.
Logged
Tuxman
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,497


OMG not him again!

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #31 on: November 19, 2011, 01:44:30 PM »

Quote
I am not sure how your average user is suppose to know the mind of an author/programmer that is devious in hiding unwanted processes/applications on startup/installation.

Don't install software you do not trust. Simple as that.

Quote
An interactive personal firewall is useful as a first line of defense, it can alert the user that some app wanting out.

That's why malicious software seldomly says "hi, I'm malicious-software.exe".
Logged

I bet when Cheetahs race and one of them cheats, the other one goes "Man, you're such a Cheetah!" and they laugh & eat a zebra or whatever.
- @VeryGrumpyCat
J-Mac
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 2,885


see users location on a map View Profile Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #32 on: November 19, 2011, 02:46:56 PM »

Yeah Tux, but most here at DC are pretty savvy about software/adware/malware, etc. and still get burned every once in a while. Think of the poor newbies who don’t have many clues at all regarding safe software! Like many members' Moms for example. If someone isn't watching over all their installations, they are pretty much SOL!

Jim
Logged

"I am getting so tired of slitting the throats of people who say that I am a violent psychopath."
Tuxman
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,497


OMG not him again!

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #33 on: November 19, 2011, 02:53:25 PM »

Mistakes are made to learn from them. Wink
Logged

I bet when Cheetahs race and one of them cheats, the other one goes "Man, you're such a Cheetah!" and they laugh & eat a zebra or whatever.
- @VeryGrumpyCat
Stoic Joker
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 5,391



View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #34 on: November 19, 2011, 04:09:35 PM »

That's why malicious software seldomly says "hi, I'm malicious-software.exe".


Hm... (Let's Experiment) Hi, I'm Malicious Software: * Malice.exe (10.5 KB - downloaded 40 times.)
Logged
Tuxman
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,497


OMG not him again!

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #35 on: November 19, 2011, 04:36:06 PM »

I will not click it, suspicious file is suspicious. cheesy
Logged

I bet when Cheetahs race and one of them cheats, the other one goes "Man, you're such a Cheetah!" and they laugh & eat a zebra or whatever.
- @VeryGrumpyCat
Pages: Prev 1 [2]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.03s | Server load: 0.03 ]