topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 25, 2024, 3:07 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: How IBM started grading its developers' productivity  (Read 2515 times)

IainB

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 7,540
  • @Slartibartfarst
    • View Profile
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
How IBM started grading its developers' productivity
« on: November 09, 2011, 03:16 AM »
I wonder what DC forum members might make of this.
To me it looks like it is either a regression to the archaic methods of Taylorism, or - more likely - a marketing puff for something called the Cast development platform.
How IBM started grading its developers' productivity

Renegade

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,288
  • Tell me something you don't know...
    • View Profile
    • Renegade Minds
    • Donate to Member
Re: How IBM started grading its developers' productivity
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2011, 06:40 AM »
Not sure. It sounds all rosy, but then again, roses have thorns too...
Slow Down Music - Where I commit thought crimes...

Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. - John Diefenbaker

IainB

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • Posts: 7,540
  • @Slartibartfarst
    • View Profile
    • Read more about this member.
    • Donate to Member
Re: How IBM started grading its developers' productivity
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2011, 11:07 PM »
This what you get when you carry Taylorism to its logical perfection in the "motivational" feedback of employee productivity:
Steve Lopez: Disneyland workers answer to 'electronic whip'

I suspect that this may be what is implied by the use of the term "motivation", in the IBM/Cast article.

Yep, let's go back to what was already an obsolete school of thought by the 1930s.
« Last Edit: November 13, 2011, 11:12 PM by IainB »