I tend not to use my text editor for most messages that I write with a browser. Mostly what I write in Firefox are forum posts, responses to blogs, etc. I don't tend to need macros, etc. for that. I'm usually content with whatever input mechanism the forum or blog provides, which often includes things I can't do with my favorite text editor, UltraEdit, such as use colors, bold, etc.
Originally, I think (maybe Channing will correct this) TEA was expected to be used for exactly that. I use Notetab Pro as my editor, and have macros (what it calls the clipbook) to help posting the code into DC. I grant I can't see the effect as one could in e.g. BBCEdit, but I know it's there. When I want to put in a URL, for example, it will pop up a little form asking for the URL itself and then the text, which makes it easy. I'm sure you could do the same with UltraEdit...So I guess what I'm saying is that for me, the Lazarus add-on provides the one thing I really need: backup in case my message goes poof.
That's very valuable, but TEA does it as well. As all its temporary files go into a single directory, I periodically archive them up, though that's probably an excess of zeal.Text Editor Anywhere - Edit Text Anywhere with Your Favorite Editor






Logged



the same day I tried it out, but didn't check out the rest of the web site.