Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion
Google+ Extensions thread
JavaJones:
Why are they weird? They're widely confirmed.
Maybe FF9 will close the gap...
http://www.dragonflame.org/2011/09/19/mozilla-firefox-9-alpha-browser-test/
http://www.favbrowser.com/firefox-9-the-duke-of-javascript-performance/
- Oshyan
Tuxman:
It's Fx, not FF ("Fire Fox"?!). And: Confirmed? By whom? Studies? Want counter-studies?
Armando:
Counter-studies would be nice. :)
In any case, considering the current state of affair, it makes more sense to hypothesise that Chrome has a slightly better performance overall. Conversely, it's probably not that legitimate to unitarily affirm that chrome is not faster than Firefox.
But this isn't the subject of this thread.
I tried a few Google+ extensions and... well, let's say the best is probably yet to be seen.
Tuxman:
It all depends on the actual website, I presume. The more Javascript is used, the better Firefox performs than Chrome. (And these days, almost everything is Javascript. Dumbass web "designers".)
zridling:
As of today, everyone can sign up for G+, no invitations required:
http://google.com/+
More here:
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/09/google-92-93-94-95-96-97-98-99-100.html
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version