Main Area and Open Discussion > Living Room
Which is more important: the gadget, or the software and apps that runs it?
AndyM:
Since it's a synergistic relationship, my answer would have be a simple "yes." :)
-40hz (May 26, 2011, 06:15 AM)
--- End quote ---
mine too
Renegade:
^Software does a lot more than just beat Wetware. Those two have a full blown sadomasochistic relationship going. And we're talking the "lifestyle" variety here. :P
-40hz (May 26, 2011, 09:02 AM)
--- End quote ---
Do tell~! :P ;D
Stoic Joker:
^Software does a lot more than just beat Wetware. Those two have a full blown sadomasochistic relationship going. And we're talking the "lifestyle" variety here. :P
-40hz (May 26, 2011, 09:02 AM)
--- End quote ---
Do tell~! :P ;D
-Renegade (May 26, 2011, 09:44 AM)
--- End quote ---
Yeah! I want pictures ... i think... :-\
Stoic Joker:
Alright (damn you guys - now I'm stuck trying to figure this out.) If I understand this correctly:
When HardWare encounters WetWare, it ends up being SoftWare in less than an hour.
Right?
Edvard:
...
I simply see good hardware as a prerequisite. That doesn't diminish the value of the hardware, because without it you're screwed. But what I'm really interested in is getting things done, and the software is the primary enabler.
-Renegade (May 26, 2011, 05:29 AM)
--- End quote ---
I agree with you 100%, I was just saying if I go shopping for a gadget, I'm going to be looking at the slickest hardware first, which won't guarantee great software, but less hardware constraints make for a better software environment.
"Build it and they will come"
Alright (damn you guys - now I'm stuck trying to figure this out.) If I understand this correctly:
When HardWare encounters WetWare, it ends up being SoftWare in less than an hour.
Right?
-Stoic Joker (May 26, 2011, 11:48 AM)
--- End quote ---
*facepalm*
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version