Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion
Software Creators Create Their Own Problems (Vimeo)
Renegade:
wraith808, you are right of course :)
Also there are different kind of documentation used or demanded in software development; some of those are useless IMHO, so I applaud "the agile method" for trying to dispose of them.
-housetier (March 21, 2011, 05:22 AM)
--- End quote ---
Assuming they can get away with it. ;D
One of the biggest criticisms of FOSS development is its general lack of comprehensive documentation. :-\
-40hz (March 21, 2011, 06:08 PM)
--- End quote ---
There's FOSS with documentation?!?! :o
40hz:
wraith808, you are right of course :)
Also there are different kind of documentation used or demanded in software development; some of those are useless IMHO, so I applaud "the agile method" for trying to dispose of them.
-housetier (March 21, 2011, 05:22 AM)
--- End quote ---
Assuming they can get away with it. ;D
One of the biggest criticisms of FOSS development is its general lack of comprehensive documentation. :-\
-40hz (March 21, 2011, 06:08 PM)
--- End quote ---
There's FOSS with documentation?!?! :o
-Renegade (March 22, 2011, 03:34 AM)
--- End quote ---
Yeah. But it's usually considered a glitch when that happens. :P
Renegade:
There's FOSS with documentation?!?! :o
-Renegade (March 22, 2011, 03:34 AM)
--- End quote ---
Yeah. But it's usually considered a glitch when that happens. :P
-40hz (March 22, 2011, 03:53 AM)
--- End quote ---
Hmmm... Just thinking... I've heard of people packaging up FOSS (GPL) then selling it. According to what I know about the GPL, content isn't GPL, so documentation wouldn't be GPL'd.
Just a random thought.
housetier:
I think the GPL applies to a WORK, whatever that is.
And if the GPL doesn't apply, in most countries copyright law will apply which usually grants even less rights than GPL would.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version