ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Special User Sections > N.A.N.Y. 2011

Major feature instead of new up for NANY?

(1/6) > >>

phitsc:
I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to extend NANY to allow major feature updates of an existing application instead of it having to be a new one. The reason being that a major feature could require just as much time as a new app but could potentially be more useful to users than if I just come up with something tiny. I'd have no problem to let someone like mouser or Perry judge if a suggested feature qualifies for NANY or not.

Maybe we'd have to find a new definition for NANY though ;)

mouser:
i wonder if the solution to this might be to have a mid-year event celebrating the UPDATING of our apps?

phitsc:
i wonder if the solution to this might be to have a mid-year event celebrating the UPDATING of our apps?
-mouser (January 24, 2011, 02:23 AM)
--- End quote ---

And if I then want to bring something new mid-year? ;)

mouser:
some people are hard to please!  >:( :D

Renegade:
Hahahaha~!

...Quarterly suits me better...

:P

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version