|
Author |
Topic: Dated reviews (Read 1811 times)
|
|
deefrawley
|
 |
« on: September 15, 2010, 04:31:57 AM » |
|
It may be time to cull the reviews as some are badly dated. For example I went to check out what the good folks here thought was the best image manager. I was wondering why ACDSee got the nod then I saw the review was from 2005! That is old to the point of being misleading. Time to update or archive.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nudone
|
|
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2010, 05:37:41 AM » |
|
Good point. I did the review with ACDSee in it and I can't say the information is that useful now. Well, maybe as just an introduction to Photo/Image Management programs it might be slightly helpful - but only as a starting point before looking elsewhere.
Unfortunately, time constrainsts don't really allow for updating the review with the latest software; so the word "Archive" probably ought to be displayed very prominently on those review pages.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wraith808
|
|
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2010, 06:55:22 AM » |
|
Or just a note in the review section that they *are* dated. Maybe make it more prevalent in the template also rather than just the posting date?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
mouser
|
|
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2010, 11:08:21 PM » |
|
It's true that we need to revamp the review section, it's long overdue, i'm just determined to come up with a proper solution before trying to revive it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
