Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site December 17, 2014, 03:30:19 PM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.


You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
Free DonationCoder.com Member Kit: Submit Request.
   
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: More speed through keyword abbreviation and auto completion?  (Read 4573 times)
Ampa
Charter Member
***
Posts: 589


I am cute ;)

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« on: September 03, 2009, 09:02:18 AM »

Have been learning a lot from the 30 more days of screencasts and had a thought or two...

1. the +sall keyword is actually quite long! (5 whole extra characters) Maybe there is a shorter alternative?
++ came to mind as it is short, simply uses the same key twice, and has nice incremental associations. But the + key is slightly off the beaten track for those of us whose touch typing is a little erratic. Tab is handily placed but probably breaks alsorts of GUI traditions, so is probably not the solution.

2. user defined keywords also tend to be long (so that they are memorable) so perhaps they could auto-complete?
I hit the + key and then start by typing "m" and FARR scans the list of keywords, finds "+music" so suggests it. I can then hit tab or enter to accept it - what ever the usual method of acceptance is with such things!

Thoughts?
Logged
Josh
Charter Honorary Member
***
Posts: 3,345



View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2009, 09:11:55 AM »

The ++ modifier is a great idea. That gets +1 vote from me
Logged

Strength in Knowledge
Nod5
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 749



View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2009, 09:22:47 AM »

Ampa: this autohotkey script lets you use ctrl+pagedown / ctrl+pageup to add/remove "+sall"
http://www.donationcoder....ic=6624.msg69271#msg69271
middle mouse button version by lanux128 here:
http://www.donationcoder....12899.msg108631#msg108631
Logged
skajfes
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 204


View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2009, 09:23:09 AM »

The ++ modifier is a great idea. That gets +1 vote from me
Except that the ++ modifier is used to pass arguments to the resuts...
Logged

It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
phitsc
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 1,023



see users location on a map View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2009, 09:34:57 AM »

I'd prefer a solution that does not change the FARR input box to switch between normal / extended result list like for example a keyboard shortcut. And use up/down to scroll through the results as was once suggested by justice.
Logged

skajfes
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 204


View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2009, 04:08:40 PM »

I'd prefer a solution that does not change the FARR input box to switch between normal / extended result list like for example a keyboard shortcut. And use up/down to scroll through the results as was once suggested by justice.
That was a great idea. I wonder what happened with that?
Logged

It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
Ampa
Charter Member
***
Posts: 589


I am cute ;)

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2009, 04:13:31 PM »

+1 for Justice's idea!

Anybody got any comments about the auto-completion of keywords suggestion?
Logged
Nod5
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 749



View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2009, 05:59:45 AM »

Ampa: I for one have no need for that. I just use short keywords/aliases instead. m for music, b for books and so on.

In Justice's thread Mouser considers adding one more result that when clicked expands to show all. If made, I hope it becomes optional. It wastes screen space since the number of matches is enough indication. If the list looks "full" then there's probably more results to be had through "+sall", if the lists is short then there isn't.

I have no problem with expanding when pressing "down" at the bottom of the list but the hotkey alternative is still much quicker, isn't it?
« Last Edit: September 04, 2009, 06:04:01 AM by Nod5 » Logged
mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 33,766



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2009, 08:33:26 AM »

i agree that we need a faster way to show all.
++ would have made the most sense until i made it be the way you specify commandline arguements Sad

maybe if we did it like this:
pgdn in result view will show all, and then subsequent presses will page through the multiple-pages of results?
Logged
phitsc
Honorary Member
**
Posts: 1,023



see users location on a map View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2009, 09:24:12 AM »

i agree that we need a faster way to show all.
++ would have made the most sense until i made it be the way you specify commandline arguements Sad

maybe if we did it like this:
pgdn in result view will show all, and then subsequent presses will page through the multiple-pages of results?
I just want to state again that I think it would be better to have a way to switch to extended result list that doesn't change the input box. Changing the input box triggers a re-search (I'm thinking plugins by the way).
Logged

nitrix-ud
Charter Member
***
Posts: 482

View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2009, 09:36:41 AM »

pgdn in result view will show all, and then subsequent presses will page through the multiple-pages of results?

that would be perfect
Logged
Ampa
Charter Member
***
Posts: 589


I am cute ;)

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2009, 10:43:03 AM »

PageDown sounds good to me - is quick, doesn't mean entering anything in the search box, and perhaps could be prompted in the status bar ("Press Page Down to see more results…")
Logged
Nod5
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 749



View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #12 on: September 04, 2009, 12:12:52 PM »

pgdn in result view will show all, and then subsequent presses will page through the multiple-pages of results?
pgdn already has a function in result view: it jumps to the last item. How about keeping that and show all only on pgdn/down while at the last item?

Also, Pgdn presently lacks a use in the inputbox. Why not then let pgdn in the inputbox trigger show all? That's one step, compared to two (down + pgdn) or three (down + pgdn + pgdn).
Logged
mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 33,766



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #13 on: September 04, 2009, 01:21:35 PM »

Quote
Why not then let pgdn in the inputbox trigger show all?

sorry -- that is what i meant.

and then as you say we can make down arrow and pgdown when on the last item and in the result area, do showall.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.038s | Server load: 0.16 ]