topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday March 19, 2024, 2:28 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Author Topic: ExtremeTech website closing  (Read 4492 times)

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
ExtremeTech website closing
« on: June 22, 2009, 11:07 AM »
           t179889273_48436_3.gif
et_logo.gif

Sad news for many of us.

Ziff Davis will be closing the ExtremeTech website this Friday, June 26th.

http://www.extremete...,2845,2349080,00.asp

The Last Column

ExtremeTech will be folding up its tent this Friday, June 26th. The current staff: writers Jason Cross and Joel Durham, producers Jeremy Atkinson and Mike Nguyen, our enthusiastic forum moderator, Jim Lynch, plus your truly, will be leaving Ziff-Davis.

So far, no specific reason has been given, although Ziff Davis has been doing various other closings and consolidations as part of an overall corporate reorganization for the last two years.

Related Link:

http://www.reuters.c...US284011642920090622



« Last Edit: June 22, 2009, 11:16 AM by 40hz »

bgd77

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 203
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: ExtremeTech website closing
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2009, 01:33 AM »
This is sad news, indeed.  :(

Will the articles that were published until now still be available?

bob99

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2008
  • **
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 345
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: ExtremeTech website closing
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2009, 11:23 AM »
Just into the beginning of their #177 podcast (about 45 seconds in) they say everything will be maintained as an archive but no new content after the end of the week.

Innuendo

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 2,266
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: ExtremeTech website closing
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2009, 08:57 AM »
ExtremeTech never impressed me. A lot of their articles seemed to be more along the puff piece variety or suffered from vagueness or errors. However, this move has more to do with the way publishing is done these days rather than the web site itself.

Ziff-Davis is a lumbering dinosaur of days past while the faster, much more agile journalists and web sites that are smaller, but able to respond much more quickly to changing needs have been nibbling like raptors on the heels of this brontosaurus (and others of its ilk) for a long time.

40hz

  • Supporting Member
  • Joined in 2007
  • **
  • Posts: 11,857
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: ExtremeTech website closing
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2009, 12:04 PM »
Ziff-Davis is a lumbering dinosaur of days past while the faster, much more agile journalists and web sites that are smaller, but able to respond much more quickly to changing needs have been nibbling like raptors on the heels of this brontosaurus (and others of its ilk) for a long time.

True up to a point. ExtremTech was a much better website a few years ago than it's been these last two. But I hadn't noticed very many errors in the actual columns. Most of what I saw that was wrong was contributed by readers, or in an occasional 'guest' article. Unfortunately, ExtremeTech didn't do as much as it probably should have to distinguish between the two. Especially in its RSS feed where everything seemed to be lumped together.

As far as the puff pieces are concerned, I think that's a lot more due to the nature of the industry, than any laziness on the part of ET. Much of the computer and information news world has been floating on little more than puff and rumors (and a whole lotta patent litigation!) ever since the dot.com bubble burst at the end of the 90s. Seems we're in an era of refinement and progressive (albeit lesser) innovation, rather than a time of major breakthroughs. Which should come as no surprise, because let's face it folks, the creation of the Web is going to be an extremely tough act to follow.

Small change makes for small news - and sometimes no news at all. But that won't stop the crows from proclaiming that each little blip on the radar is soon to become The Next Big Thing that will change the world forever...yadda-yadda-yadda.

This results in the unfortunate tendency on the part of the 'new press' to indulge in hyperbole as it responds to the changing needs of its readers by: "nibbling like raptors on the heels of this brontosaurus (and others of its ilk)..." ;)

So why this change in tech reporting and commentary?

I think it's because a very significant percentage of the current readership grew up with the rise of the Internet. And this new self-proclaimed 'elite' has come to believe that the most rapid and far reaching burst of technical innovation in human history is more the rule, rather than the exception, to how technological advancement usually takes place.

Thus, a new journalism is born.

Much like the old brontosauruses they criticize, these sleek new raptors try to please their readers who want fast, new, and ultra-cool things to talk about. Nothing wrong with that. It's called marketing, although I'd guess there are those out there who would prefer to call it something like pimping, in order to give it that edgy new-journalist sound.

Unfortunately, a lot of these more 'agile' journalists don't always bother to vet their information before they commit to their blog. There is a definite trend towards pursuing the latest 'scoop' rather than getting the facts straight.

The new "current wisdom" for technical reportage seems to  be: Get something (anything) out before anybody else does - and issue a 'clarification' if it turns out that what you reported was wrong.  

And when there's little to report, there's always the old standby of slagging somebody - or something. A bit of adroit name-calling will always serve to generate enough faux-controversy until something better comes up.

And why not toss out any pretense of civility while you're at it? Especially if you're writing in a venue where a vulgar cheap shot will earn you reader points for being clever.

Besides, XYZ sucks- an epic POS!!! WTF? reads ever so much better than
XYZ doesn't work as advertised. don't you think? ;D

I dunno...for all their faults and problems, I still think we're losing something as each of the old publishers quits the stage. Time will tell.

Just my :two:

 :)



« Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 12:32 PM by 40hz »

Innuendo

  • Charter Member
  • Joined in 2005
  • ***
  • default avatar
  • Posts: 2,266
    • View Profile
    • Donate to Member
Re: ExtremeTech website closing
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2009, 12:50 PM »
Yes, I have to agree with you for the most part about the trends in tech journalism. At least we are getting away from the business model that print media (magazines) has engaged in for a long time, i.e.e Known security app publisher buys fourteen full-page ads in a magazine and just by a wild coincidence that known publisher's security suite won the product shoot-out in the same issue.