However, the "prostitute to politics" section in the science part is missing.
Well, besides that("prostitute to politics"), there is probably a lot more that you could
add to both models to represent them as they might appear in operation today, but the diagrams could become a little busy.
After their disgraceful breach of their own code of scientific ethics against making pronouncements and apparently advocating taking science on trust/authority rather than proof
, I am no longer entirely sure which model version the Royal Society subscribe to.
However, I would think that anybody could be forgiven for presuming that it might be a foregone conclusion (QED) that the Science model is categorically not
what is taught/understood in
calamatology at the UEA in the UK or at Penn State U in the US - though I hear they do offer a damned good Master's course in Astrology.