Very nice 'first look' review of openSUSE 11.1 (Linux) -
Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site July 31, 2015, 04:29:14 PM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?

Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.

You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
The N.A.N.Y. Challenge 2011! Download 30+ custom programs!
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Very nice 'first look' review of openSUSE 11.1 (Linux)  (Read 3929 times)
Friend of the Site
Charter Member
Posts: 3,292

Linux captive

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« on: December 22, 2008, 06:43:21 AM »

The latest round of Linux distros (versions) are just about complete, and DistroWatch has a 'first look' review of openSUSE 11.1 in its weekly news section.

I've been working with openSUSE all weekend and I was impressed with every part of it. All the software I could ever want in available. openSUSE is most popular on the continent. Like Fedora 10, I'm happy to see that openSUSE took chances and got it right. (Wake up Canonical, you're falling behind fast!) Even Novell's flavor of OpenOffice 3 is far better than their 2.4 version. Being Microsoft-free, I don't need their built-in proprietary formats. openSUSE's stability and noticeable improvement on speed are welcome, and being able to encrypt your HD during installation is a nice touch. My ATI 4850 radeonHD drivers were installed at setup.

However, here are the caveats: (1) Fedora 10 seems to have done a better job with KDE 4, if for no other reason, more of the desktop's features are available; (2) Fonts were terrible on my 1900x1200 display, but that was easily corrected; (3) Customizing software package installation at setup was tedious, and like the partition view, did not give you a single view of what you were installing; (4) Loved the partition screen, but there really should be a simpler version. You either had to go with their auto-selected choices (which were not previewed), or pick what looked like an expert mode. I was left confused, but somehow I got it right.

As the author states, you really won't go wrong with 11.1, and it's a solid major version you can sit on for as long as you want.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2008, 12:15:50 AM by zridling » Logged

- zaine (on Google+)
Coding Snacks Author
Charter Honorary Member
Posts: 2,762

View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2009, 01:57:05 PM »

Fonts were terrible on my 1900x1200 display, but that was easily corrected

Were the fonts too small on such resolution or was this the hack-X-to-96-dpi workaround everybody bugged about last year?
I've often figured that if I got tired of Ubuntu I'd move to Suse, but so far I haven't been annoyed that badly. Nice to see a good review of it.

All children left unattended will be given a mocha and a puppy.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register | About Us Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.029s | Server load: 0.48 ]

Share on Facebook
submit to reddit