Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion
Collectorz.com Book Collector 6
Darwin:
Trust me, Darwin, I know. This was just a kind of thought experiment ;)
-TucknDar (December 11, 2008, 03:07 PM)
--- End quote ---
Yeah... I had meant to note in my posting above that I'm sure you know all this - you've been fairly active on their forum and likely know this better than I!
FWIW - I think it's a grand idea :Thmbsup:
Darwin:
Tuckndar - 40hz and I posted within moments of each other and his post got relegated to the end of the previous page. If you missed it, have a read as it's more pertinent than mine, above :-[
TucknDar:
They do this, actually. If I'm understanding it right, when a user searches ISBN through BoC, if it isn't found in Collectorz database it'll look for it in other sources. I found a book in the Norwegian national library this way. Also, when a user has searched this way (like I have), the result will be available in the database when the next user searches for the same ISBN. So, I suppose that's some user input that is used after all...
-TucknDar (December 11, 2008, 02:36 PM)
--- End quote ---
Just out of curiosity - is there any good technical reasons why anybody would want to do it that way? What is the advantage to shoehorning all that data, and all those queries, through a keyhole. I'm not challenging their right to do it, since I'm not a customer, but I just don't get what the advantage would be. -40hz (December 11, 2008, 03:08 PM)
--- End quote ---
I don't know if there's any good reason to do it that way. To me it's obvious that the previous way of being able to select search sources is way better, but at the very least this "solution" is better than not providing the "background" search. I'll certainly do more testing to see if there's any point in using Book Collector 6 (I have lifetime license, so upgrade costs aren't an issue).
Like you, I'm "just" a customer.
Carol Haynes:
I think there is a reason - as the user base grew I bet sources like Amazon were not happy with all customers accessing their data directly. By going through a single portal it will only face one request per item because the data will then be stored in the Collectorz database for future searches.
I'd guess the reason for the change is that either the search sites were charging and Collectorz wants to cut down on costs, some of the search sites have told Collectorz to cease and desist in the old way of doing things or maybe they are moving over to a subscription model.
What is the bet that in a year or two the software will be free and the data base will be an annual subscription? It will get around the loophole for customers with lifetime updates because they will be able to argue that you have lifetime updates to the software but the database is now on a subscription which I am sure is still niggling under the surface (and why there is no mechanism for lifetime licensees other than to request a new key every time there is an upgrade).
TucknDar:
I'd guess the reason for the change is that either the search sites were charging and Collectorz wants to cut down on costs, some of the search sites have told Collectorz to cease and desist in the old way of doing things ...-Carol Haynes (December 12, 2008, 04:57 AM)
--- End quote ---
Actually, if that is the real reason, I'd expect Collectorz to say so. I think it would save them a lot of trouble with angry users, since it would be a valid reason to change the software, and hard to argue against for the users. And as far as I understand they do have some sort of deal in place with Amazon at least, which is why there'll be a link to Amazon from the entries in your database (not absolutely sure, though, but I read an Alwin post that way).
What is the bet that in a year or two the software will be free and the data base will be an annual subscription? It will get around the loophole for customers with lifetime updates because they will be able to argue that you have lifetime updates to the software but the database is now on a subscription which I am sure is still niggling under the surface (and why there is no mechanism for lifetime licensees other than to request a new key every time there is an upgrade).-Carol Haynes (December 12, 2008, 04:57 AM)
--- End quote ---
Surely, they would never... :-\
Even if that happens, 5.x will still work as long as someone (big IF...) maintains the perl scripts for IMDB, DVD Empire, Amazon, etc. I think one problem that could arise from this move and even the possibility of the future subscription model is that those contributing to the database might start to think twice about contributiong if they felt they did voluntary work so someone else would profit. I sure hope that's not in their plans, though, after all it's their great software that has got them this far 8)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version