Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site June 18, 2013, 03:22:47 AM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.

You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
Your Support Funds this Site: View the Supporter Yearbook.
   
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
+  DonationCoder.com Forum
|-+  Special User Sections
| |-+  DC Website Help and Extras
| | |-+  Site/Forum Features
| | | |-+  General Review Discussion
| | | | |-+  Years on awards?
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Years on awards?  (Read 6356 times)
mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 31,089



plarker mouser see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« on: April 25, 2005, 04:54:26 AM »
should we put the current Year on the award images? ie not simply "Best Text Editor" but "Best Text Editor - 2005" etc.
in anticipation that the choices may change over time.
Logged
tenseiken
Columnist
***
Posts: 136


View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2005, 10:27:13 AM »
Probably not a bad idea.  You never know when something better will show up.
Logged
-John
Jibz
Developer
***
Posts: 717



Cold Warrior

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2005, 10:44:23 AM »
Sounds like a good idea to me thumbs up.
Logged
"A problem, properly stated, is a problem on it's way to being solved" -Buckminster Fuller
"Multithreading is just one damn thing after, before, or simultaneous with another" -Andrei Alexandrescu


[ may-june 2013 ad experiment; click here to learn more about donationcoder.com ]

Sentinel
Columnist
***
Posts: 130


Generally confused

View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2005, 11:12:26 AM »

Definitely!  It gives the software companies something to strive for year after year, if nothing else.  Wink
Logged
Designated "proofreading free" zone.
zridling
Friend of the Site
Charter Member
***
Posts: 3,280


Linux captive

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2005, 09:31:14 PM »
I like the idea of a "year" award, but allow DCC the right to re-view the class when new versions are released. Some apps can quickly leapfrog others between versions. Also, there's been a terrible trend going around where one version is great; and the next just blows, followed by a version that fixes the previous bomb.
Logged
- zaine (on Google+)
mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 31,089



plarker mouser see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2005, 09:40:45 PM »
hehehe.

yeah, the thing is, year isnt ideal, since its not really a natural way of specifying the lifespan of the review, but it seems like there could be a serious problem if a year later we award best XXXX to some new program, and 2 companies now have the indentical award for identical category...

the alternative would be like

put an edition number on it.

like

Best In Class
Phase 1

vs.
Best In Class
Phase 2

to indicate that phase 2 is a more recent award than phase 1.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.035s | Server load: 0.2 ]