Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site April 24, 2014, 12:13:06 PM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.


You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
Free DonationCoder.com Member Kit: Submit Request.
   
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Dictators in free and open source software?  (Read 4158 times)
mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 32,700



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« on: July 22, 2008, 02:42:13 PM »

I know this is controversial, but i tend to agree with the general premise that it's helpful to have one person (or two), who is for all intents and purposes in charge of making final decisions and riding herd over a project.

This short essay talks about why:

Quote
Some people seem to challenge the idea that most (if not all) free software projects need a benevolent dictator—that is, somebody who has the last say on every decision. They are quick to point out Linus Torvalds’ past “mistakes” (see the brackets): using BitKeeper to manage the kernel, not allowing “pluggable” schedulers in Linux, etc. As a software developer, I feel that a dictator is absolutely necessary in every free software project. Here is why.


ps. While i agree with most of the points I don't don't agree it has to be one person for life -- i see no reason not to rotate people in charge. And i think when a project has only a few core developers, a normal informal equal-responsibility situation is fine.  I think this need to have one designated person in charge really becomes useful mostly when the group starts getting bigger.  My experience is that some things will just never get done unless you have a designated person to crack the whip and make sure everything that needs to get done does in fact get done.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2008, 02:54:02 PM by mouser » Logged
epopuI
Charter Member
***
Posts: 18


View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2008, 04:15:53 PM »

Interesting and thought provoking - I tend to agree too - especially with the P.S.  thumbs up Thmbsup
Logged
lanux128
Global Moderator
*****
Posts: 6,049



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2008, 10:47:40 PM »

hmm.. i see an opening for the post of whip-handler at DC. tongue

but a good read nevertheless. smiley
Logged

mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 32,700



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2008, 01:31:45 AM »

Also, dictator is really a loaded word and sets the wrong tone for such things..
A more helpful term would be Project Manager.
Logged
mahesh2k
Supporting Member
**
Posts: 1,406



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2008, 09:51:52 AM »

Mark Shuttleworth behind ubuntu/canonical is good example of single leader but this is nt applicable always,every leader knows when/how to step out and let the new person in charge.

I agree with mouser,it's good to rotate people.
Logged
mikiem
Participant
*
Posts: 87

see users location on a map View Profile Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2008, 03:46:16 PM »

I've always found that using the term: "Benevolent" Dictator actually works rather well.  smiley

Seriously!  cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.031s | Server load: 0.02 ]