HOME | Blog | Software | Reviews and Features | Forum | Help | Donate
Click here to
donate and join now!
Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site March 27, 2015, 02:09:56 PM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?

Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.

You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
Check out and download the GOE 2007 Freeware Challenge productivity tools.
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
Pages: Prev 1 [2]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: the definitive minimal amount of programs for the greatest security?  (Read 17207 times)
First Author
Posts: 34,298

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #25 on: April 16, 2005, 02:17:14 AM »

yes, you're point is well taken, the "best" setup is going to depend on the person and the situation.

and for some categories this is more true than others.  You could probably make two classes of users, newbies vs. powerusers, and be able to do a pretty good job of recommending the best newbie setup vs. poweruse setup.  something to keep in mind when we do reviews.

although this thread started out asking "what is the definitive minimal amount of programs for good security", and i think a reasonable answer to this is 2, a resident firewall and antivitus program.  and maybe an on-demand antispyware on top of that if you tend to get infected by such things.  its easy to see how people could get overwhelmed with all the different kinds of protection apps, and so i think its a reasonable question.  i do think process guard is overkill for most users, in that its hard enough to use and likely to confuse people who are not really savvy about such things.
« Last Edit: April 16, 2005, 02:20:13 AM by mouser » Logged
Cody's Creator
Posts: 4,117

see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #26 on: April 16, 2005, 04:28:19 AM »

i'm glad to see someone talking so passionately on the subject  Scott - i suppose when i use language like 'definitive', 'minimal' and 'greatest' i deserve a bit of a slap around the face to bring me back to reality.

i'm sure you'll understand that i was only really interested in solutions to common systems used today. so things like win xp and 2k - just what your average user has at home (with a powerful enough machine to run current software).

i just wanted a least fuss solution - something i can recommend or install on a typical non techie users pc and then leave them to it. hopefully with the knowledge that the next time i visit them it won't simply be to fix their computer.

regards to anyone more clued up, well, they don't really need a 'definitive' answer as they will have discoverd their own preferences through experience or reliable information from elsewhere. a few opinions shouldn't go unwelcomed though, so as to cut through the fashions and unfound loyalties to a particular program that we can sometimes fall prey to.

the joy of being a wiser pc user is that you do have the freedom to play around with different security software, safe with the knowledge that pretty much whatever you end up using will do a sufficient job for your everyday use.

on a personal level, i'm not in the least bit worried about the security of my own machine. i have a firewal, anti-virus scanner and still haven't updated to service pack 2. big wow, i know.

maybe my original post should have been more along the lines of asking the question of what would be the best 'security practise'. this might lead to a more interesting and conclusive reply. (or am i just moving the goal posts?)

the method of backing up your hard drive (and doing it regularly) still seems the best solution to me. keeping a track of what each backup contains; what programs were installed and in what state. maintaining this kind of habit will then help in those rare occasions when even the most knowledgable user messes up his ultra secure system.

programs like 'goback' appeal more to me than any typical kind of security software but i still wouldn't use it because of the strain on the system it appeared to have when i tried it (i might have been imagining that though).

i admit whole heartedly prevention of something going wrong with your machine whether it be  infection or whatever is all in hope and can never be 100% fool proof. the ultimate prevention lies with the ability of the user so i guess i'm onto a loser when i ask what's the best security software to use when aimed at your average mom or dad.

i'd like to see the 'system restore' feature of win xp beefed up a bit (or goback improved). something akin to full system backup but on a realtime and regular basis with plenty of snapshots. i know acronis true image, et al, are almost there but as your documents aren't intelligently stored so that they don't get wiped out in the restore process it's not the perfect solution (yet).

to sum up, prevention would be very nice but a quick cure suits me if it's not too painful.

Pages: Prev 1 [2]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.052s | Server load: 0.03 ]