ATTENTION: You are viewing a page formatted for mobile devices; to view the full web page, click HERE.

Main Area and Open Discussion > General Software Discussion

Vista 64-bit - Service Pack 1 Arrived!

(1/3) > >>

Beth UK:
Out of the blue it arrived 45 minutes ago - Vista Service Pack 1, via windows automatic update. Entire installation process took ... well... 45 minutes.

I didn't think SP1 was due until early-mid March via automatic updates? Still, it's here! Have to say I was dreading it's arrival a little bit due to some of the pre-warnings about driver conflicts etc and past experiences with Windows Service Packs returning many settings to their default 'factory' settings. But, no, as far as I can tell the Service Pack has left things as they were - right down to my daily warning that "User Account Control is switched off"  :-\

There we go! I have to say again that while I continue to run XP on certain systems my experience with Vista 64 continues to be warm and loving!! For me it just works, despite my fiddling and tweaking.  :up:

Renegade:
While I haven't updated to SP1 yet, I'm finding Vista very nice. I do hate the copy stuff, but whatever. There are worse things in life.

Does SP1 fix that nasty copy delay thing?

f0dder:
SP1 is supposed to change explorer's copying algorithm quite a bit - and give much better SMB/CIFS performance when talking to other SP1 (and server2008?) computers... but SMB is still going to suck speedwise for older OSes, Microsoft probably won't make SMBv2 upgrades for those OSes.

nontroppo:
Mark of Sysinternals fame writes about the copy engine improvements here (link temporarily down when I tried though):

http://blogs.technet.com/sysinternals/archive/2008/02/05/updates-autoruns-v9-10-sigcheck-v1-50-mark-s-new-blog-post-and-webcast.aspx

nontroppo:
For the millisecond fetishists, ZDNet have benchmarked Vista RTM and SP1:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1367

Conclusions: Vista RTM was faster in all tests than SP1.

The same writer also tested the file-copy engine in Vista SP1 and XP SP2:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=5

XP is faster than Vista in almost all tests. So whatever improvements are in the Vista SP1 copy engine, though a probable improvement over RTM, they are still overall slower than XP.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version