Latest posts of: f0dder - DonationCoder.com
Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site July 05, 2015, 10:05:46 AM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.


You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
Free DonationCoder.com Member Kit: Submit Request.
   
  Forum Home Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
      View this member's profile 
      donate to someone Donate to this member 
Pages: Prev 1 ... 310 311 312 313 314 [315] 316 317 318 319 320 ... 352 Next
7851  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: [FBSL] LZO compressor (GPL is viral and evil, kthx) on: October 01, 2006, 11:46:47 AM
Section 0 of the GPL, with my emphasis:
Quote
The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law: that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it, either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another
language.

Section 2b of the GPL, again with my emphasis:
Quote
b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third parties under the terms of this License.

And the viral nature of the GPL is cemented with this clause:
Quote
These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

You might also want to check out the GPL faq, I'll quote a pretty relevant part of it right here:
Quote
Q: If a library is released under the GPL (not the LGPL), does that mean that any program which uses it has to be under the GPL?
A: Yes, because the program as it is actually run includes the library.
7852  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: [FBSL] LZO compressor on: October 01, 2006, 11:26:58 AM
So, you've got a special non-GPL license for LZO? smiley
7853  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: [FBSL] LZO compressor on: October 01, 2006, 09:29:35 AM
I'd like a copy of the FBSL source code, please.
7854  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: Tiny 'Touch' 32 bits program in C (3 kb) on: October 01, 2006, 09:10:24 AM
Yay for people who don't care about standards. Professional? *cough*
7855  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Buying New PC. Suggestions? on: October 01, 2006, 09:08:10 AM
Make sure the computer has pci-e and not AGP! It's getting harder by the day to find AGP video cards.
7856  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: HD noise distracting on: September 30, 2006, 05:35:04 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory says that the write cycle is probably around 1million for normal flash, and I would think/hope these drives are a bit better than that.
 
7857  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Game: Funny Farm on: September 30, 2006, 02:05:18 AM
7858  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: HD noise distracting on: September 30, 2006, 01:59:35 AM
Much less noise, much faster speed (fragmentation basically becomes irrelevant), less heat, less power consumption, no chance of mechanical failures. I wouldn't mind one of those for my primary drive (windows + apps + source/documents + a few games), then move everything else to a NAS or DAS(?).
7859  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: HD noise distracting on: September 29, 2006, 07:56:55 PM
Which newer solid-state disks are those and what are the access times and transfer rates? Wink
Haven't seen any benchmarks, but this is the one I was thinking about. I also think somebody mentioned it here at DC not too long ago. Well, there's an italian article that I butchered up with babelfish, as far as I can tell we're speaking 50MB/s xfer rates, and insanely low access/seek time. And a pricetag of $950 >_<
7860  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: Tiny 'Touch' 32 bits program in C (3 kb) on: September 29, 2006, 07:50:12 PM
Now you got the sources, you can do it smiley
Personally I prefer telling 1 that is equal to True when successfull and 0 that is equal to 'False' when failed... It's just another point of view!
Not if you ever have to deal with makefiles or the like.
(emphasis is mine).
7861  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: Tiny 'Touch' 32 bits program in C (3 kb) on: September 29, 2006, 04:50:38 PM
You really should return '0' since that's the standard returncode for success...
7862  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: The $39 Experiment on: September 29, 2006, 04:48:28 AM
Heh, nice cheesy

EDIT: he certainly did put a bit of effort into it - I couldn't be arsed writing that many silly praises just to get a few free treats of that kind. But funny nonetheless.

Oh, and if people start doing this on a larger scale, it won't continue working for long.
7863  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Lectures from Professor Who is Out of It - HA! on: September 29, 2006, 04:34:57 AM
Haha, great cheesy

Too bad that's only part of it, I assume? I WANT MORE! Kiss
7864  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Spank the Monkey: today's flash game on: September 29, 2006, 02:44:30 AM
"Hi!"
"Uh, hi boss..."
"So, watcha doing?"
"Spankin' the monkey".
7865  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: HD noise distracting on: September 29, 2006, 02:13:12 AM
Christ, 2x4GB iRAM in stripe. Bastards. I'd prefer one of the newer solid-state disks, though.
7866  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: How to add/delete files of an installer? on: September 29, 2006, 02:00:26 AM
Thanks for the replies. I posted the same Q on InstallShield's forums and here's the reply I got:

http://community.installs...m/showthread.php?t=163002.
Christ, what a roundabout way of doing things smiley
7867  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Surveillance equipment has never looked so ..... scary! on: September 29, 2006, 01:59:01 AM
The problem with DarkCreek, as was noted when slashdot posted about it a while ago, is that it's just an image and some text. No URLs to shops or more thorough descriptions. Might as well be a mock-up.
7868  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Buying New PC. Suggestions? on: September 29, 2006, 01:56:38 AM
Yup, we need some usage specs.

If it's just for a bit of word processing and internet usage, just about anything will do. Personally I'd go for a core2 duo and at least 512 megs of ram, graphics card depending on needs (but definitely PCI-E, although onboard with possibility of PCI-E expansion is an okay option too if you don't know if you'll be doing games).
7869  DonationCoder.com Software / Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Why do unzip apps have to be so complicated? on: September 29, 2006, 01:51:24 AM
jsmallberry: WinRAR is popular because it's been around for a while, it has a good compression/speed ratio, it isn't very expensive (not everybody's a freeloader tongue), and it has very good commandline support ans OS features (saves NTFS alternate streams and security info) - plus unrar is free & has source code available.

You should be able to use the free unrar for your purposes.
7870  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Lectures from Professor Who is Out of It - HA! on: September 28, 2006, 05:20:13 PM
Keep us posted smiley
7871  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: FairUse4WM : Strippingng DRM (digital rights management) from windows media on: September 28, 2006, 04:54:46 PM
The program is pretty interesting - instead of trying to work on the files, break the encryption, etc... it hooks the player. FairUse hooks it right after the decryption of a chunk of audio date, which can then be written out to file instead of just playing it.

This is probably a lot easier than doing reverse engineering of (I guess) heavily obfuscated code dealing with the file, and it should be easy enough for the Reverse Engineer to use a tool like bindiff to "catch the patch" when the protection is updated.

Only downside is, of course, that decryption is a bit slow. Just say no to DRM'ed media in the first place, and say no to CDs that violate the standard - even if you have a nice drive capable of ripping it.
7872  News and Reviews / Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Registry Cleaning Software on: September 28, 2006, 09:56:56 AM
Quote
Even removing some obsolete entires without defragmenting will speed up your system.
I've never seen an effect of doing that, and it doesn't surprise me. Windows uses a binary search when looking up keys, which means that even to look up a key in 4.2billion keys it needs to look at maximally 32 keys.

Of course deleting some keys means a little less disk use, but the gains there are very small.

Quote
Applications will sometime wait for nonexistant service links to respond before timing out.
THAT kind of problems can be substantial though smiley

7873  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: What IRC client do you use? on: September 28, 2006, 09:50:18 AM
I don't follow the jump from X11/Xorg to win32 and back.
That probably was a bit confusing smiley

I just meant that everytime I've tried X under linux, with or without accelerated drivers, etc, window resize has always been very laggy. One little game had 100% CPU usage when resizing (and not just "artificial usage", it really bogged the system down), other applications have "controls that lag into place".

XChat brings that lag to win32...
7874  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: What IRC client do you use? on: September 28, 2006, 09:02:33 AM
I'm not, I just want something that works smiley. Laggy window resize is very typical of anything on X11 (XF86 and XOrg anyway), but XChat is particularly bad, at least on windows.

One should take the source and make a native win32 port of xchat...
I wonder how easy that'd be...
7875  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: What IRC client do you use? on: September 28, 2006, 03:09:43 AM
I find XChat to have extremely lagging redraw on resize, which is enough that I just can't stand using it.

No matter which client I've tried, I always end up back with mIRC, even though it's somewhat of a pig. But it works, and it's comfortable smiley
Pages: Prev 1 ... 310 311 312 313 314 [315] 316 317 318 319 320 ... 352 Next
DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.078s | Server load: 0.1 ]


Share on Facebook
submit to reddit