Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site October 31, 2014, 03:32:27 AM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.


You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
View the new Member Awards and Badges page.
   
  Forum Home Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
      View this member's profile 
      donate to someone Donate to this member 
Pages: Prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 350 Next
26  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: SSD's - How They Work Plus Tips on: May 14, 2013, 12:45:15 PM
I stopped reading the article at
Quote
With hard drives, the faster the spindle speed, the faster the drive. The amount of cache also comes into play, but by and large, a 10,000-rpm drive is faster than a 7200-rpm drive, which is in turn faster than 5400-rpm and 4800-rpm drives. That’s an easy and intuitive metric for comparison shopping.

..if they get something as simple as that wrong, I don't want to waste my time reading the rest.
27  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Folder protection on: May 13, 2013, 11:54:56 AM
tslim: supporting >4gig memory on 32bit XP is, at best, a terrible hack, and it's not something SoftPerfect even attempts. Move to a 64bit OS smiley
28  DonationCoder.com Software / Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Conflict with LibreOffice/OpenOffice on: May 13, 2013, 11:53:36 AM
I was able to resuscitate OpenOffice,
Don't bother next time. Just go with Libre and allow 'Open' to be put out of its misery once and for all. tongue
Oh, I'm using Libre these days (and think it's pretty much as shitty as Open, but even though it doesn't run as well as old MSOffice versions, at least it's gratis). It's just that I was able to resuscitate OOo, not Libre. And only once or twice, anyway.
29  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Where Is Windows 8.1? on: May 13, 2013, 11:50:03 AM
I'm leaving the exploring of what is at this link to you bold, dashing adventurers here.  Caveat emptor (Let the buyer(downloader) beware!)
Ahem, what's the legal status of that leaked ISO?
30  DonationCoder.com Software / Clipboard Help+Spell / Re: Conflict with LibreOffice/OpenOffice on: May 08, 2013, 02:40:47 PM
For what it's worth: this also happens to me with ClipX, and has happened in both OpenOffice and LibreOffice. I've only had it happen in calc, and I haven't found out how to reproduce it - happens rarely enough that I haven't bothered /actively/ trying to reproduce, and it happens under different conditions (both when dealing with text-only cells as well as formula cells).

Once, I was able to resuscitate OpenOffice, but that was blind luck and I haven't been able to repeat that - involved the window system menu (upper left corner), and attempting a bunch of restore/maximize/move operations. Also, FWIW, ClipX seems to keep on trucking when OOo/LO locks up.
31  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Adobe drops the gauntlet - going forward it's cloud - or nothing. on: May 08, 2013, 10:37:52 AM
How long do you think before someone produces copies with the activation and online check code stripped out or the activation period updated to 1000 years?
That will work for now... but I expect them to begin moving more and more computations to the cloud within long. Just like there's big players trying to push internet-streamed gaming... it's a big wet dream not only to stop piracy, but perpetually berapereave sheepcustomers of cash on a monthly basis.
32  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Adobe drops the gauntlet - going forward it's cloud - or nothing. on: May 07, 2013, 12:45:04 AM
This is how it begins...
33  DonationCoder.com Software / Post New Requests Here / Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists on: May 07, 2013, 12:43:31 AM
Just for the record, I don't believe you have malicious intents - a tool like this really wouldn't make much sense for malicious use. It would of course limit your system's resilience against malware quite a bit.

And while I don't believe there's any malicious intent, I still think it's misguided, though. But that's probably because I never really run into really vexing permission problems. I can think of perhaps three occasions over the last few years...

1) dealing with NTFS USB drive with user accounts made on another machine (and obviously in a non-domain setup).
2) doing some serious customization of Windows install images - removing and adding drivers.
3) fixing up a running Windows because I had messed up the install image too much.

Apart from that, I can't really recall any permission related problems. But I'm the kind of guy that really doesn't mind UAC popups, anyway.
34  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: New PC double-take on: May 07, 2013, 12:37:49 AM
The semi-official story was that
...I wonder if the EU settlement and the N editions of Windows doesn't have something to do with it? tongue
35  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: New PC double-take on: May 06, 2013, 11:58:36 AM
Not much need to elaborate. Windows 8 dropped the ability to play such media out of the box. Saved themselves a whole $2 license fee per copy of Windows by taking that capability out.
Probably a bit more than $2 - anti-competitive lawsuits are costly.

Who uses Windows Media Player anyway, when there's MPC-HC and VLC? smiley

The free VLC media player running under Win8 still works for most optical media disks (except encrypted Blue-Ray) although I wonder how much longer that will remain true. Microsoft is an avid supporter of DRM and patents and all things IP. If somebody in the industry seriously squawks about VLC, you can expect Microsoft will do something to prevent apps like that from working under Win8.
I kinda doubt they have the balls to do that, especially since there's already nice and cheap alternatives that make using pirated content so much easier than attempting to be honest and struggling with getting DRM'ed crap playing.
36  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Your weekend cheer: Russian dashcams capture human kindness on: May 03, 2013, 05:04:57 PM
Your weekend cheer: Russian dashcams capture human kindness
More of that, please.

Tiny glimpse of hope.
37  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Finally! A private, non-cloud file-sharing service on: May 03, 2013, 04:51:25 PM
Curt: it's because you haven't dealt with well-seeded torrents - and, perhaps, because you haven't had proper port-forwarding (which shouldn't matter with well-seeded stuff, but will hurt you badly with scarce and/or pirated stuff).

The protocol itself has several advantages to http/ftp... first, it's distributed - so you can saturate N links instead of 1. It has chunk-sized error detection and correction - with HTTP and FTP, you wont detect corruption unless you do an md5sum after downloading, and it's corrupt you'll have to regrab everything. With torrents, everything is broken into chunks (size can vary, but iirc chunksize is usually around 512kb).

Also, both HTTP and FTP *sucks* for small files - you need a new request for each file. For FTP it's really bad, for HTTP at least pipelining and keepalive mitigates stuff a bit... for torrents, you just keep on streaming (in a way that's not optimal for grabbing individual small files, but extremely superior for grabbing a wad of stuff).

Legitimate stuff has often sucked on torrents, though - a few years ago, I could grab linux ISOs a lot faster through HTTP than their torrent services - I guess they simply didn't hook up the entire http server bandwidth to their torrent protocol, which is pretty damn silly... after getting ~100kb/s (from random peers) for a few minutes, I'd cancel the download and hammer their HTTP servers directly at 4MB/s.
38  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Office 2013 drops cleartype, fonts a disaster. Any way to fix it? on: May 01, 2013, 04:36:55 PM
Btw, if you spend any time on linux (ubuntu), you may have realized the freetype rendering is superior to cleartype anyway.
That surprises me a bit - at least a while ago, FreeType didn't include sophisticated TTF hinting because of patents... but perhaps they've been able to work around that, or by using another font format, or something?

I've never been much of a fan of font anti-aliasing anyway, neither on Windows, Linux nor OS X - looks too smudgy for me, both on CRTs and TFTs.
39  Special User Sections / Site/Forum Features / Re: Google ad test on: May 01, 2013, 01:26:10 PM
Interesting idea to add the warning stuff - the ads served are definitely distasteful.
40  Other Software / Found Deals and Discounts / Re: BestCrypt Container Encryption - 50% OFF at BDJ on: April 28, 2013, 04:29:34 PM
BestCrypt is (or at least used to be, haven't checked it in ages) a decent product.

But with TrueCrypt around, I honestly don't see the raison d'être for BC.
41  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Goodbye OpenOffice, Hello LibreOffice on: April 28, 2013, 04:19:05 PM
My problem with LibreOffice is how resource intensive it is (and OpenOffice before it).
Open with a 3-sheet spreadsheet open, LibreOffice is using 128k of memory on my openSUSE Linux machine. I don't know what it would do on a Windows machine, which I assume you're using?
I seriously doubt you're looking at the correct memory stats. It's around 31 megs for LibreOffice calc on my Mint install, just-launched with three empty sheets.

Besides, it's not just about memory usage, the suite is a major CPU pig. It's slightly sluggish even on my i7-3770 with 16 gigs of ram - but try using it on a pmmx-200 with 64 megabytes. Office2000 on that hardware flies.
42  DonationCoder.com Software / Post New Requests Here / Re: Patch to Disable ACL access-control-lists on: April 24, 2013, 08:07:06 AM
Presuming we're talking Windows ACLs: why on earth would you want something like that on a live system?

For the legitimate scenarios I can think of, you'd be better of with an exFAT partition or booting to Linux to salvage data...
43  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: Binary Patching for "Similar" Large Files on: April 24, 2013, 07:53:15 AM
So the -B option is buffer size, given in bytes? Then it sorta makes sense.

I wonder why they moved away from mmap.
44  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: What to do with an SSD after it fails on: April 24, 2013, 07:44:25 AM
I've got no idea whether a "controller swap would work" - it depends on where the drive's mapping tables are stored, and a lot of SSDs these days (at least claim to) have AES encryption - where's the encryption key stored? And finally, on top of that, I've got a feeling that the prints aren't built in a modular way that makes any kind of swapping possible unless you've got lab-grade equipment.

Just a few minutes, let me open up my failed Intel X25-E and grab a couple of snaps for y'all.

EDIT: here - does that look like something you can fix yourself?

[attachthumb=1][attachthumb=2]
45  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Finally! A private, non-cloud file-sharing service on: April 23, 2013, 05:07:34 PM
This would be cool if one could somehow use an intermediary FTP server, to serve as the "middleman".

So it would be USER>FTP>USER<FTP<USER

You would get the benefits of private file sharing, with the added bonus of HTTP download speeds xD
Ummm... wat? O_o

The torrent protocol is superior to both HTTP and FTP in quite a lot of ways, including resume-ability and encryption (neither HTTPS, FTPS (foo! please die!) nor SFTP would work very well for peer-to-peer scenarios) and speed. And I can't see why having such a middle man would fix the residential upload bandwidth issue anyway? You'd still need to push your data there?
46  Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: Binary Patching for "Similar" Large Files on: April 23, 2013, 04:17:23 PM
that is a pretty magic B option.
Yeah, that does look pretty incomprehensible O_o
47  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Java 8 Delayed on: April 22, 2013, 03:09:46 PM
I saw that but I sorta ignored it ... "how bad can the security be?!"
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad cheesy

Plus I am as much of one to upgrade to new crispy version numbers, so at least they seem to be going a bit old school and not releasing "Java 8" on the heels of "Java 7.7, 7.8, 7.9". Or something. (Whatever little they can get away with!)
"Java 8" is actually "Java 1.8" smiley - iirc they started this weirdness with (what whould have been) Java 1.5. Mean people might say they should've added a zero-dot prefix instead, but hey smiley

Sad to see it's being postponed - Java7 was a major letdown, with not very much interesting stuff added - I miss lambdas. It would indeed be foolish of them to ship Java8 without lambda support.
48  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Google forbids resale or lending of Glass on: April 22, 2013, 01:34:28 PM
I can understand - and accept - if this is for the first batch of Glasses, which to me seemed to be meant mostly for developers. Early access to nifty hardware often comes with some pretty draconian NDAs, just look at console development kits, for instance.

But if that stuff is in the general terms for all Glass devices to come? Whoa ohmy ohmy ohmy
49  Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Worst Javascript/other intrusions? on: April 22, 2013, 01:27:04 PM
Are you serious or are you just being sarcastic?
Being serious.

Hmm. Let's start with the clarifications. AdBlock Edge is a spinoff of AdBlock Plus. Somewhere in there was an argument that AdBlock would in fact allow "nice ads" through.
Yup, by default ABP allows some google adwords or whatever, but there's a config option to block entirely. Can't say I don't understand the developer, and I believe it has caused perhaps a bit too much fuzz - I can certainly live with that option and its default... OTOH, perhaps things would've been worse if there hadn't been all that fuzz.

Ghostery then I agree is different, and reports-then-shutdowns misc ad trackers. Sure whatever that company is gets some data, but I haven't tried to find an OSS replacement for Ghostery yet.
I don't believe it sends data unless you enable the "GhostRank" feedback thingy? But yes, the company behind is related to the ad business, so there's reason to be wary - still, unless somebody finds out it sneaks data back home without consent, it's a pretty decent addon smiley

So THEN, we get to Javascript. Problem is, the few times I tried to totally nuke it, some page would come along on a 1-time shot I'd wish it would work. So NoScript was bad news. I kinda like Elemon's idea - Blacklist pages that are the worst offenders. ___ Site I posted above, but apparently Slate is pretty bad too.
Sure, backlisting  will take care of annoyances on sites - but IMHO that's not a very good reason to do JavaScript blocking. I use it to drastically reduce the risk of drive-by infections, you really do need whitelisting against that. And once you get into the habit, it really isn't that much bother - only need a bit of fiddling when you visit a new domain.

But hey, I also avoid Flash and Java in my main browser - if I need to watch flash, I temporarily fire up Chrome for that specific URL. I only need Java for NemID, and that steaming pile of manure(*) is only allowed to run in a Linux VM.

(*): NemID, that is - while I despise applets with lots of bileful nerdrage, Java and the JVM itself are decent enough.
50  Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Gadget WEEKENDS on: April 19, 2013, 04:03:41 PM
So, back in... not sure exactly when, but early 2000s, pre-2003, I bought a used NAD 314 (originally purchased in 1996, the receipt says). It's been a trusty friend, and undergone repairs once - but I got tired of smacking it around to get all the speakers working.

So, Wednesday, I went out and bought this beauty:
[attachthumb=#]
A Cambridge Audio azur 651A. It's super nice to have decent audio again, without having to smack the amp around every few minutes - and tight bass and treble sections seem to have quite tighter response. I can't tell much of a difference when listening to Nick Cave, Depeche Mode or The Cure... but stuff like VNV Nation and Suicide Commando, or Metallica's "...and Justice For All"? Wow.

Not sure my neighbors appreciate it as much as I do, though.

Also, I kinda wanted an amp with TOSlink, but stereo amps sporting that had ridiculous pricetags, and generally wouldn't be able to downmix surround signals (though handling stereo at 24bit 96 or 192KHz). This amp has an USB input, connecting it to a computer makes it show up as a generic USB audio device, capable of 16bit@33/44.1/48KHz... good enough for me, especially at the pricetag. And it even works without a hitch on Linux, who would've thought?!

Next up: getting the NAD C521BEE fixed... all the smacking around of the NAD314 has gotten the laser desynced, so it doesn't play CDs anymore embarassed embarassed embarassed
Pages: Prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 350 Next
DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
[ Page time: 0.041s | Server load: 0.15 ]