|
26
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: IE8 on the loose!
|
on: March 25, 2009, 07:11:05 AM
|
Dirhael - would you be willing to post a screen shot of how bad FeedDemon looks with northmay.com blocked? I’m quite happy where I am but if, in future, I decide to update it would be nice to have some control over what the GUI looks like...
Absolutely, here's a screenshot for you  [attachthumb=1] Right now I am OK with 2.7. Google Reader doesn't do anything at all for me, so I won't miss that integration in 2.8.
Thanks!
Jim
I don't use Google Reader all that much either, but it's fantastic for reading feeds on mobile browsers seeing as it can also adapt linked pages for viewing on such devices.
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: IE8 on the loose!
|
on: March 24, 2009, 09:51:59 PM
|
....I am still on FeeDemon 2.7.0.0 (last version without Ads).
Me too - and there I'll stay!! After paying for another year and then having it go free, I am not also gonna get their damn ads!!  Jim  Block northmay.com and the ads will go the way of the Dodo bird. Well, you will be left with a dark empty space where they used to be so it may not be the best solution for everyone, but it works for me* * I really want to be able to use the upcoming 2.8 release which likely will have the ability to sync with Google Reader.
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: wanted: alternative to FastStone Image Viewer
|
on: March 17, 2009, 09:42:48 PM
|
You could have a look at one of my favourite freeware image viewers, ArtSee. It does everything you've listed although the move functionality isn't exactly what you're asking for. It does have it, it's just not quite as fast and easy as a single key-press (if you on the other hand want to copy the file to a favourite location or the desktop instead of moving then you get away with a single keypress). Everything else though, it does *really* well. It got keyboard shortcuts for just about everything, it's fast and comes with just about every feature I can think anyone could want in a image viewer, and it does all this in under 200 KB (it's a standalone executable). Here's a copy/paste of the feature list from the website: Slideshow (slideshow, timer) Sort (forward/reverse/random, name/created/modified/accessed) Layer (normal, fullscreen, wallpaper, stay on top, blend, opacity) Loop (loop, pause, exit, reshuffle) Navigate (next & previous w/gears, first, last, current) Scroll (mouse, arrow keys w/ gears, autoscroll) Folder (browse, current, refresh, subfolders, hidden folders, peek, autorefresh) Find (find/filter/exclude, find next, bookmark, goto mark, goto) Formats (bmp, emf, gif, ico, jpg, png, tif) Favorites (send shortcut, send to desktop, send copy, copy to desktop, view favorites/desktop/target, folder) Wrap (resize window to wrap around each image) Crop (remove borders and unused background) Squeeze (scale down to fit window/desktop) Shrink (scale down to fit one side) Stretch (scale up to window/desktop) Zoom (in, out, 100%, 1% gear, zoom lock, zoom step, zoom/scale quality) Rotate (rotate, rotate left, rotate lock, aspect filter, flip horizontal) Layout (centered, corners, roaming) Collage (fixed-size roaming images) Transitions (select effects, overlap/wipe) Window (caption, status, taskbar/tray, decor, white, center/roam, corral, draggable, 5 presets, show/hide, single instance) Fullscreen (caption, cursor, centered/roaming image) Wallpaper (center, tile, stretch, clear, restore) Shell (view, explore, open with, copy file, move/rename, save as, copy image, copy view, paste, recycle) Shell++ (archive, view with, explore with, Blackbox) Settings (save, save now, bookmark on exit) Drag and Drop (folders/files/shortcuts, Shift appends) Menu pins (keep menus open while adjusting options) F1 menu at corner/cursor Command line options Tray icon controls and mouse wheel support Can be run as a screensaver Can be run as a wallpaper changer Needs no installation Saves settings file in program folder Unicode enabled
Screenshot:  (As everything is operated using keyboard shortcuts or the right-click menu, the above image probably doesn't tell you much) Here's a larger screenshot with the menu open
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Quicktime only available with iTunes
|
on: March 15, 2009, 04:23:20 PM
|
The page is back to normal, so everyone can "enjoy" QuickTime without the burden of iTunes  Thankfully, we may be able to ditch the entire thing once Win7 comes along as it now has native support for the MOV container (the trailers from apple.com I've tested with in build 7057 all worked just fine without any 3rd party codecs installed)  I smell a lawsuit! I hope not, because I loathe all things QuickTime on Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Quicktime only available with iTunes
|
on: March 15, 2009, 04:17:51 PM
|
The page is back to normal, so everyone can "enjoy" QuickTime without the burden of iTunes  Thankfully, we may be able to ditch the entire thing once Win7 comes along as it now has native support for the MOV container (the trailers from apple.com I've tested with in build 7057 all worked just fine without any 3rd party codecs installed)  Don't know what this'll mean for web content expecting the QT plugin though...
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: cannot play ripped music files
|
on: March 13, 2009, 06:20:58 AM
|
Curt, how on earth would winamp be able to play DRM-covered tracks that you don't have a license for?
Heh, I was wondering the same thing myself. --- I also just thought I'd mention that this problem did not happen by itself. See, WMP does have the possibility to add DRM to ripped files, but it is not enabled by default. You have to mark the relevant checkbox manually, and here's where you'll find it (screenshot shows the default settings): 
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Which MP3 tagger do you use?
|
on: January 28, 2009, 01:32:13 PM
|
I cannot imagine what MP3tag is doing to the files, when tagging them, that are changing the signal the file later is sending to the MP3Ext's bit-rate reader, but it is doing something. I'd be willing to bet that you have MP3Tag set to write ID3v2.4 (which I believe is the default) and MP3Ext only handles or prefers ID3v2.3 or earlier. But it's a bit of a wild guess since I've never used MP3Ext and don't know much about it. You could change that in MP3Tag and test it; the option is found at Tool -> Options -> Tags -> Mpeg. I do all my tagging within Foobar2000 and MP3Tag and they've both worked extremely well for me for many years. Yeah, I've used mp3tag for quite some time now and I've never had problems with the files after tagging them (well, except the id3v2.3 vs 2.4 issue with some players but that's hardly a fault of mp3tag). If you really do believe that whatever program you're using to tag files are altering the audio data itself, use foobar2000 with the offical Binary Comparator component to check the files (just create a copy of the files before tagging, then compare them with tagged copies).
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: windows 7 beta available for free Jan 9 (!)
|
on: January 15, 2009, 08:11:29 PM
|
I would (I have a 4G usb stick I can spare) but my box doesn't boot the usb. I've looked around for ways to make Grub boot the usb port and floppy-based usb booters, but nothing has worked so far.
You can only boot to a device your BIOS supports and identifies as bootable. AFAIK there isn't any way to get around that. In Win7, if your BIOS supports booting to your USB stick, the Mark Partition as Active option will be available: (see attachment in previous post)In this case, the 4Gb USB stick showing up as Disk 1 is not supported as a bootable device. (Bummer!  ) That's not always true, because I have at least two memory sticks that I can't set as active in Windows disk management yet I have absolutely no problems booting from them when I need to. Of course, the BIOS needs to allow you to select the device if you are to boot from it, but what Windows itself says does not really matter.
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: DeviantArt or WinCustomize Wallpaper Rotator
|
on: December 08, 2008, 06:37:47 AM
|
Thanks for posting this great utility, I really like it! In fact, it inspired me to rewrite the feed backend on my wallpaper site to MediaRSS so that it would be supported by it. If you want to use any of the image categories for your own desktop, you can find a link in my profile (added bonus effect of the rewrite: It made the Cooliris/Piclens FF extension work with the site as well) 
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Whats on your desktop?
|
on: November 09, 2008, 07:22:10 PM
|
W-O-W, where do we can get such gorgeous wallpaper? In the meantime, I'll clean my desktop, it's been more than a year since I posted a shot, so I got to be presentable at least  That one I got as part of my paid subscription to cgwallpapers.com. Great site, even if you have to pay for it (really, $10 USD for a year is perfectly acceptable to me  ).
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone uses MediaMonkey? I need your advices.
|
on: October 27, 2008, 09:26:58 AM
|
- very interesting solution, Dirhael!  But I can't help wondering what will happen if someone gets mad at OpenDNS and tries to block them. Will such an attack have any influence in my end of the line? Big THANK YOU for the file,  installing as we speak, ehh... as I am typing this :-) Edited: Should also mention that I cannot even reach the monkey via Thunderbird & Thunderbrowse! No problem at all, just happy to help out  As for the blocking...well, not really unless it's your ISP that does it [the blocking] (they won't). That said, if you're happy with your ISP's DNS servers and don't want or need the extra security provided by OpenDNS you could get by using another solutions if it's just a matter of a single domain or two that fails to resolve. This solution would be to edit your hosts file and add the IP and domain of the server you're trying to reach. The drawback of this is that if the website ever changes their IP you'll be right back where you started, but as a short-term solution it would work.
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Anyone uses MediaMonkey? I need your advices.
|
on: October 27, 2008, 07:50:16 AM
|
The mystery is growing. My supplier (YouSee.dk) told me that the monkey is working okay on their side, and we tried a number of solutions, we even resat my IP address. Nothing helped. I may give up - No media monkey for me!  Try using OpenDNS. Been using it for around a year now, and it's reliable and fast. Of course, that won't help you if you can't even ping the MM server (209.200.50.117). In that case, I've mirrored the latest build for you right here so that you'll at least be able to install and use it 
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: which Linux version for my laptop
|
on: October 22, 2008, 07:17:42 PM
|
Darwin - I also have yet to try xubuntu and I don't really see myself going for it. I do not have the need. People say it is snappier than the gnome desktop from ubuntu. However, I think my ultra customized rox-desktop is still superfast and functional...
If you want to try for yourself: "xubuntu-desktop" installs everything for the xubuntu version, "ubuntu-desktop" and "kubuntu-desktop" do the same for ubuntu and kubuntu resp. You can choose your desktop during logging in under "Session".
Davidtheo - I agree with Edvard: ubuntuforums is a very good place to start searching. It might be a little overwhelming at first, so just take your time :-)
If you ever choose to do that, make sure you're using aptitude instead of apt-get. If you don't, chances are *very* high that you won't be able to completely remove the full set of packages by just removing the *ubuntu-desktop one.
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Iobit smart defrag vs o&o defrag pro
|
on: October 11, 2008, 09:05:36 PM
|
The last freeware version from disktrix is what I use. the GUI is not one of the nicest...but I let it do its work at night when I go to sleep anyway. What I like from this one is that it first defrags files and moves them afterwards to the inner or outer part of the harddisk c.q. partition depending on the setting that you prefer. In my case the files I used most are put on the outer part, improving the access speed. Since I tried this one, I dropped all the others. Oh yeah...what I also like a lot from this is that it doesn't keep b.tching about lack of space on the harddisk/partition, while others start complaining that 10%-15% has to be free on the harddisk/partition before commencing or don't start at all before this 'requirement' is met.  [rant] What is that about anyway? (that there is a need to have free room is logical to me, but why put the percentage behind the number? To me the fact that 10 Gbyte of free space should be more than enough on a 500 Gbyte harddisk....but no, it has to be 50 Gbyte? What can be so big? [/rant] Most other of the good defraggers offers you the same option without having to use the silly GUI of UD. Also, I'm not touching anything from Disktrix after they tried to con people into paying for telling them that using NTFS compression could possibly improve disk access speeds. Really, unless their future products actually cures both cancer and HIV/AIDS I'm not using them even if I were paid to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Apple Patents the OS X Dock!!!
|
on: October 08, 2008, 05:38:51 PM
|
You're on fire, George! That was a fast response! You're right, though, I'm sure Apple's lawyers wouldn't even break a sweat drafting their arguments in a case like this. I have to say, though, that I can't really see what or how they are losing by having the dock replicated on other platforms. Next they'll be going after the Expose clones and the widget clones (not that they invented them but I'll bet they've got a patent application in). Of course, I'm getting ahead of myself again - they haven't done anything, yet and I hope they don't. I hope Apple doesn't go after the other dock apps but given Apple's attitude and sue-happy legal history, I'm almost sure they will  Software patents are evil. I hope you're wrong about Apple... if you are not, I think that going after small developers is petty. They already did this with Y'z Dock way back when. Oh crap! It's interesting that they actually were granted the patent when you consider the fact that Stardock have been making docks since 1994, years before Apple implemented their version.
|
|
|
|
|