|
3751
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
|
on: July 31, 2007, 08:38:53 PM
|
Before You Ask Before asking a technical question by e-mail. or in a newsgroup, or on a website chat board, do the following: 1. Try to find an answer by searching the archives of the forum you plan to post to. 2. Try to find an answer by searching the Web. 3. Try to find an answer by reading the manual. 4. Try to find an answer by reading a FAQ. 5. Try to find an answer by inspection or experimentation. 6. Try to find an answer by asking a skilled friend. 7. If you're a programmer, try to find an answer by reading the source code. How do I do that?
|
|
|
|
|
3753
|
News and Reviews / Official Announcements / Re: ZillaRank: An improved search for smf forum
|
on: July 29, 2007, 07:43:06 AM
|
Mouser: the real power of this feature is that you can now select this from the quick search dropdown box for the topic you are currently browsing, or from *within* the results page. It's very much appreciated. For me, the new work by Wordzilla turns all of the interesting material on Donation Coder into a really useful database. Also, since Wordzilla is just an anagram of Dollar Wiz, it's helpful to know how much to donate 
|
|
|
|
|
3760
|
DonationCoder.com Software / DcUpdater / Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DcUpdater - 1.15.01 - July 11, 2007
|
on: July 14, 2007, 12:58:21 AM
|
Mouser, here's a small thing to consider. Using DC Updater (1.16.01) with my system heavily burdened by other online tasks: - DC Updater found several updates, including itself.
- It takes a long time to grab the updates (due to other system activity here).
- DC Updater updates itself first, creating the need to restart other update downloads.
Should Updater hold off on updating itself until its tasks are finished?
|
|
|
|
|
3765
|
DonationCoder.com Software / DcUpdater / Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DcUpdater - 1.12.05 - JUN 30, 2007
|
on: July 11, 2007, 11:22:39 AM
|
im about to release an improved update checker and i will modify drag+drop to handle this case -- basically it expects you to drop a folder or .dcupdate file, and i assume you are dropping the exe? im just going to make the updater drop the parent folder, which is the best thing to do i think.
I tried both ways, the exe and, when that didn't work, just the folder. I'll wait for the next iteration, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
3766
|
DonationCoder.com Software / DcUpdater / Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - DcUpdater - 1.12.05 - JUN 30, 2007
|
on: July 11, 2007, 03:01:02 AM
|
there are 2 places the updater gets info about programs it can update:
* The custom list in the "Extra Update Files" tab * The directory C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\DonationCoder\DcUpdater\RedirectFiles If I drag and drop, say FARR, onto the updater, the path appears nicely in the 'extra update files' tab-window but FARR doesn't appear on the updates tab, nor is it checked for updates. I don't have an entry for FARR in DcUpdater\RedirectFiles. What have I missed?
|
|
|
|
|
3767
|
DonationCoder.com Software / SMF Forum Mods / Re: DC SMF Search Mod - an improvement search for smf forum (codename Zillarank)
|
on: July 10, 2007, 09:40:13 PM
|
A reply i posted which addresses some of the "why" issues that cranioscopical suggested i tackle... and My concerns in this case are not about paying for stuff - i'm just objecting to what i perceive as an inappropriate attitude and approach from smf management, which i fear may be a sign of them moving in wrong direction in terms of management and maintenance. A lot of heat's been generated by a rude and ungrateful response from SMF. 'Un-words' abound for such behaviour, without a doubt; unintelligent, uncouth, uncooperative, unimaginative... Even so, Are you sure that, had you first sought a written permission it would not have been granted? And are you sure that nobody in the SMF hierarchy is both senior enough to waive the requirement and intelligent enough to see the advantage in what you offer? Anyway, many thanks -- again -- to you and Wordzilla for the very significant inprovements to the search function here. Boy, what a difference!
|
|
|
|
|
3768
|
DonationCoder.com Software / SMF Forum Mods / Re: DC SMF Search Mod - an improvement search for smf forum (codename Zillarank)
|
on: July 10, 2007, 12:12:55 PM
|
I understand you are just doing your job but I'd really like the smf coders to take a reconsider if this is the approach they want to take with these things, it's just the wrong attitude in my opinion. We included a mod, and then the patched version of one file. It's just silly to object to that. For people like me who do not use package mods and modify the files themselves, stopping people from including a modified file is insane. I understand your frustration and often share such feelings when dealing with some of my clients. (In my time I've rendered considerably more pithy responses than these.) Even so, "wrong attitude", "silly", and "insane" are probably not the best-chosen terms to gain co-operation. Also, instead of pointing out what you want, try headlining the benefits to them. Nobody likes to be told they're wrong, especially not those who are! It makes little-thinkers intransigent.
|
|
|
|
|
3769
|
DonationCoder.com Software / SMF Forum Mods / Re: DC SMF Search Mod - an improvement search for smf forum (codename Zillarank)
|
on: July 10, 2007, 11:46:35 AM
|
instead of a thank you we got someone an official smf person complaining that due to a tiny technicality we were violating their license and we should correct it within a few days or face legal action... left me with a really bad taste in my mouth. Small-minded people abound who are concerned with the letter of the law and not its spirit. I can well understand (and share) the initial flare of...annoyance. Aggravating though such people may be, it would be a pity to deny the larger community of SMF users the chance to benefit from the good work that's just been completed here. Might it be worth trying to make contact with someone at SMF who does enjoy a modicum of common sense, in order to see if a sensible distribution can be negotiated and 'sanctioned'? Don't take your ball and go home, that puts you in their league. Count to ten and try again?
|
|
|
|
|