Messages

51

Screenshot Captor / Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - ScreenshotCaptor - 2.37.01 - OCT 7, 2007

« on: October 19, 2007, 05:45 PM »

Sorry - forgot to attach the Firefox message, which might help someone else.

-deepkent (October 19, 2007, 04:55 PM)

On the off chance that you haven't deleted it yet, it's on your L: drive just waiting to be run from Windows (Explorer or the command line if you're one of those hard-core typing junkies).   You were just in a hurry and didn't finish reading the dialog. Firefox has security built in to keep you from running programs directly from it by accident -- if you click the "launch application" button it'll do it. Or just browse to the location it's showing and you'll be all set.

The same issue would appear no matter what executable (EXE file) you download; it's probably not a problem when you download zip files and others but it's still better to manage files outside of your browser.

52

Screenshot Captor / Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - ScreenshotCaptor - 2.37.01 - OCT 7, 2007

« on: October 19, 2007, 02:25 PM »

Yeah well that's your problem then

-mouser (October 19, 2007, 02:15 PM)

Careful -- that could easily be taken as "that's your problem then" rather than "that's your problem then". 

Mouser: No, the file is 118kb.

-deepkent (October 19, 2007, 02:01 PM)

Try clearing your browser cache. IE can be stubborn about using cached material even after it's been updated online. (Also it happily keeps partially-downloaded files. It just dumps 'em wherever you said to put 'em with the full name of the intended file and no indication there was a problem. Firefox is a little smarter about that stuff.)

If that doesn't do it you'll have to look at firewall/antivirus/proxy settings and so on.

53

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: October 10, 2007, 02:52 PM »

I'd hate to see it grow into something that will itself need taming tho.

-Grorgy (October 10, 2007, 02:38 PM)

Heh! Very good point. 

54

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: October 10, 2007, 10:32 AM »

It's definitely rare to ask for something "disturbing". Heh!

I love the graph idea. If that's too complicated, even a way to export stats to Excel or something would be really kewl.

55

Screenshot Captor / Re: LATEST VERSION INFO THREAD - ScreenshotCaptor - 2.37.01 - OCT 7, 2007

« on: October 07, 2007, 01:15 PM »

Thank you sir!

56

General Software Discussion / Re: 64-Bit Software

« on: September 30, 2007, 01:51 PM »

I did try WS-FTP (32-bit) alongside SmartFTP (64-bit) and have to say that SmartFTP was so much faster - in real and tangible ways.

-Beth UK (September 26, 2007, 06:43 PM)

I'm not very familiar with WS-FTP, but I know the SmartFTP developer spends a lot of time tweaking it. I get the impression he spends time pretty much every day fine-tuning some aspect of it or adding something new. It may not be the 64-bit nature of SmartFTP that's showing up but the constant care and pruning it gets.

57

Living Room / Re: The impotence of proof reading

« on: September 22, 2007, 06:06 PM »

It's actually much better to read it than hear/see it -- it's easier to catch the subtleties. Click the "more info" link at the top right, in the gray area describing the video.

58

DcUpdater / Re: Automatic license application and full catalog

« on: September 21, 2007, 12:37 PM »

I'd like if it would download a full description (pad) of all programs once

-tabletguy (August 10, 2007, 04:15 AM)

That's a great idea -- it's actually why I came to the website today.   Wouldn't it be cool to just have a clickable link in the line for each program to be updated that was user editable? That way you could keep the current DC discussion thread linked with the program's version history. I'm always interested in "what's new" before deciding whether to update.

Or, maybe there's a way to auto-update the link when the developer opens a new thread?

59

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: August 08, 2007, 07:36 AM »

Frankly, I just want WMP to play all of my music files, so I can do without the (not so) Real concept.

-Curt (August 08, 2007, 02:06 AM)

I hear ya there! Definitely a hassle to have to use a half-dozen players for a variety of boutique formats.

BTW, Armando, thanks for the link to BES -- looks worth checking out!

60

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: August 07, 2007, 09:01 PM »

How does one tell 60 (or 300) apps they are of less importance? Should I mark all of them "Force below normal"?

-Curt (August 07, 2007, 05:25 PM)

That's the beauty of Process Tamer -- it reduces those below normal that demand more than their fair share of CPU time, whether 5 or 5000.

Don't forget that you can adjust the amount of CPU usage that triggers the priority reduction, so it could actually work out to be the equivalent of "Force below normal" for all but the foreground app when set that way.

I'm glad a very high priority works for you, though -- hopefully RealPlayer 11 will be optimized before it goes "final". 

61

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: August 07, 2007, 04:14 PM »

For some reason the new RealPlayer 11 Beta will not play all steady when forced to the normal "High" (13), but will do hiccups and apparently needs a little more power reserved, say 16

-Curt (August 07, 2007, 12:57 PM)

Is that safe? I realize I don't know your specific situation, but in general it would seem better to reduce the priority of less-important apps. Any priority above 8-13 starts to run the risk of impacting critical system processes.

62

DcUpdater / Re: DcUpdater - Coming Soon - Teaser Screenshot

« on: June 22, 2007, 12:08 PM »

regarding proxy: i use an open source cross-platform library called "libcurl" to do the downloading, it has it's own proxy settings.

-mouser (June 22, 2007, 10:55 AM)

Ah! Gotcha.

However, as wordzilla pointed out to me, this could cause a huge amount of bandwidth since pad files are so big

True -- XML is a fairly bulky format. But then again, so is HTML.

63

DcUpdater / Re: DcUpdater - Coming Soon - Teaser Screenshot

« on: June 22, 2007, 10:12 AM »

more screenshots:

-mouser (June 19, 2007, 03:33 PM)

I'm curious -- why use your own proprietary proxy setup when Windows has a central config via IE?

Also, Justice mentioned that you might be superceding his updater with this program. If so, I posted a recommendation about the file format to parse for updates so it could be used universally.

64

Post New Requests Here / Re: Software AutoUpdater -- Experimental Software Autoupdating

« on: June 22, 2007, 08:54 AM »

We don't want to reinvent the software download wheel.

I didn't know if there was too much competition between the different software download sites to organise some sort of standardised format?

-Perry Mowbray (May 21, 2007, 10:17 PM)

Exactly -- it's already been established for years in XML format. It grew out of the old BBS "VENDINFO.DIZ" files, designated the Portable Application Description (PAD). Here's the homepage with specs, examples and links to support utilities: http://www.asp-shareware.org/pad/

65

Post New Requests Here / Re: DONE: a self-scrolling, BPM adjustable html/notepad/text file gizmo

« on: June 03, 2007, 12:58 PM »

gotta problem with us pagans dude?

-pinkjimiphoton (June 03, 2007, 07:27 AM)

Not me!   But...

lol...remember, in his time, JESUS was a pagan and a heretic...

Mebbe a matter of interpretation -- but I don't think he's ever been accused of being a pagan.    He was only a heretic to The Establishment -- basically Big Religion of the day, because they'd twisted Bible concepts so they pretty much could make more money offa the faithful and look better than everybody else in the community.

so tread lightly, friend, there are many possibilities...

Still a valid statement IMO. 

We now return to our regularly scheduled programme, already in progress... 

66

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: May 25, 2007, 10:18 PM »

Sounds good! No rush -- just getting a "whether" report. 

67

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: May 25, 2007, 09:19 PM »

... I thought I'd start a new thread and collect some of the outstanding feature requests and bug reports so i make sure not to miss them.

-mouser (April 11, 2007, 01:42 PM)

So, what's news? Hadn't heard from you for a couple of months. Do any of the suggestions sound workable

 

68

General Software Discussion / Re: Don't call it "the tray"!

« on: April 24, 2007, 09:56 PM »

hehe.. google has proved that it is a corporate business after all.. so much for "do no evil"..

-lanux128 (April 24, 2007, 09:23 PM)

I'm starting to wonder if it's even possible to run a huge business and still put out a good product over the long haul. Still, ya gotta admit, protecting their investment in the company name is one of those necessary evils. Imagine how long it took some creative people to come up with the name Kleenex, and now it's about as generic as can be...

Whoops, wandering way offtopic. How about a Kleenex dispenser in the Notification Area? 

69

General Software Discussion / Re: Don't call it "the tray"!

« on: April 23, 2007, 08:54 AM »

He already addresses systray.exe in TFA...

-f0dder (April 23, 2007, 07:52 AM)

Sort of. He says "I think the reason people started calling it the "system tray" is that on Win95 there was a program called "systray.exe" that displayed some icons in the notification area". Win95? This is 12 years later and it's still there. I guess that his making it sound like it was only around over a decade ago was what prompted me to ignore that part of his post.

Still, on rereading it, it sounds like he's saying that systray.exe only displays certain specific system status icons, and isn't a manager module (separate from Windows Explorer) for that area of the taskbar. If that's the case, I'll fall back to agreeing with most of the other folks here: language is about communication, and "system tray" is a more comfortable way to describe the specific Windows feature than "notification area". In my opinion, "notification area" is a technical description, not a name. However, I'd be willing to call it "status bar" or something else (not already in use) that's similarly casual and descriptive.

(As for that part of the taskbar, I sure hope somebody's redesigned it in Vista, because it's a very poorly designed, highly unreliaable UI in XP!)

70

General Software Discussion / Re: Don't call it "the tray"!

« on: April 22, 2007, 11:38 PM »

It's a shame to see that somebody writing on MSDN could be so out of touch. Maybe he could check the listing of files on just about every Windows machine on the planet, with minor variations: C:\WINDOWS\system32\systray.exe

71

ProcessTamer / Re: Process Tamer Update Coming -- Express your feature requests here!

« on: April 22, 2007, 07:54 PM »

This is one of my favorite background programs! It really does help make Windows more usable. 

The ideas I like best out of what people have thought of so far:

• Temporarily allow a busy task -- Select a currently-throttled process and allow it to continue freely until the process ends (or PT ends), without creating a permanent rule.

-CWuestefeld (April 12, 2007, 11:16 AM)

2] Adjusted priority_range:  https://www.donation...dex.php?topic=8154.0
 ...
 4] The ability to adjust the triggers per process.

-shmate (April 17, 2007, 06:24 PM)

A tip of the hat to these three, which I think combine to round out an important overall concept: more fine-grained control over individual processes.

I also like the idea of a list of recently tamed apps and the start/end times for their taming. Besides system diagnostics or troubleshooting benefits, it also helps one affirm that the Tamer settings are working well overall. Maybe the stats could even be exported in a CSV format or something similar for the die-hard number crunchers out there -- heck, you could even do a daily/weekly/etc. graph if you could export the relevant info.

Notice that I'm not asking for a built-in graphing capability, which would be quite the project in itself. Maybe next version. 

72

Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MyLife Organized (Time Management To-Do list maker)

« on: April 15, 2007, 07:59 PM »

To avoid redundancy, I'm posting this link to another thread here on DC. It contains a brief info update on MyLife Organized. By putting the link here, the info will hopefully reach those that are monitoring this thread but not the one I updated.

73

Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: MyLifeOrganized - a journey in search of the perfect GTD software

« on: April 15, 2007, 07:58 PM »

To avoid redundancy, I'm posting this link to another thread here on DC. It contains a brief info update on MyLife Organized. By putting the link here, the info will hopefully reach those that are monitoring this thread but not the one I updated.

74

Post New Requests Here / Re: DONE: a self-scrolling, BPM adjustable html/notepad/text file gizmo

« on: April 11, 2007, 11:30 PM »

maybe i'll just do a small one with some suggestions implemented from here

-Gothi[c] (April 11, 2007, 10:06 PM)

Methinks I can safely say that it'll be thoroughly tested. 

75

Post New Requests Here / Re: a self-scrolling, BPM adjustable html/notepad/text file gizmo

« on: March 24, 2007, 09:12 AM »

Thanks for the trouble of  signing up to respond btw!

-Gothi[c] (March 24, 2007, 02:35 AM)

Yes, definitely -- thanks for the trouble.