topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday April 18, 2024, 7:22 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - worstje [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: prev1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23next
51
General Software Discussion / Re: Log CPU and memory usage
« on: June 18, 2013, 10:57 PM »
I'm going out on a limb and ask you why this is important to have. The amount of Virtual Memory allocated by a process doesn't represent the amount of 'physically' takes up in your RAM, so while high numbers may show you there is a bad memory leak or greedy memory usage in a program, it won't mean anything with regards to 'improving' your computers performance. It's like profiling a cars performance by blindly gauging its speed and fuel left in the tank, not keeping in mind whether you are inside a city, stopped at a traffic light, or whether you may have a caravan hooked up.

Most likely, you have a specific issue, causing bad performance in a certain situation and you want to know what causes it. In general, the Sysinternals programs have a lot of diagnostic tools that can help you with this kind of issue. Download the whole suite, and unzip them somewhere of your liking (mine go into C:\Programs\Sysinternals); they're a pretty useful bunch all around. The majority you'll (almost) never use, some you'll end up using daily.

Autoruns won't help your situation too much, but it basically msconfig on steroids. Most places where programs can hook into your computer and slow it down is listed inside of it, and you can either disable or delete items to try and improve your computers performance.

Process Explorer is a replacement for Task Manager. Just get it. Seriously. GET IT. It's the powertool of process management, showing you so much ******* shit about all of your proceses that 99% of the time you'll find a very strong clue, if not direct cause, to what is causing your computer to slow down. If you keep it running in the tray, you can pop it up at any time and see the processes recent behaviour with regards to CPU, Memory and I/O. It's very easy to see which processes keep hammering your computer every few seconds, for example. The first thing I do after I reinstall Windows is to replace Task Manager with this program; it is really THAT useful.

Process Monitor is basically a logger such as the one you are looking for. However, it is also the most cumbersome to use. Why? Because it logs ****** everything. A program accessing a single value inside the Registry tends to cause multiple log entries, for example. It tracks all processes. Having it running for five seconds can easily give you 10,000 lines of diagnostic information. On a good note, it has a very powerful filtering system, so after you are done capturing it (or before you start), you can just hide everything you don't want logged. This tends to not focus on memory or cpu, but rather on actions performed. If a process stalls, you can easily spot it because the timestamps will show a gap, and Process Monitor more than likely shows what the program was doing right before or after that. All around though, this thing is like a needle in a haystack, and requies a fair bit of effort, especially if you lack experience with it.

RamMap is a kind of Process Explorer, focusing only on the memory usage at a specific point in time. Much of the simple information is stuff Process Explorer also offers, but the views in this are far better for comparing the behaviour in which its memory is used.

VMMap basically dissects a running process, showing you exactly what 'health' it was in at a certain point in time. It's basically RamMap, except it is focused on one process as opposed to being focused on your entire machines memory situation. It isn't very useful for an end-user, although it can sometimes give clues towards certain behaviour. Basically, it shows you how much memory it uses and what kind of purpose and traits it holds. For experienced users, it can be useful for spotting malware or securty holes in software.

In general, the last two or even three one are not something you want or need to use. Sometimes really extreme numbers can totally tell you what is wrong: a driver reserving tons of memory and preventing applications from using it, programs polling the registry every second, thousands of ever-increasing handles being consumed by processes: stuff like that which is otherwise hard to diagnose can become really visible with these tools.

52
You may want to try running Process Monitor as an Administrator on one of the affected boxes, and then reproduce the issue. (Of course, that is assuming that the Event Log doesn't have a more helpful message than you have already shared with us.)

53
I totally didn't make it. Starting ~30 hours before the deadline really is a little bit too late. :P The stuff I have right now is more of a Proof of Concept than a proper NANY submission, so I'm afraid it'll stay hidden. I'm sorry to have gotten your hopes up a little bit back in IRC, mouser. :D

I might do a late normal release later this year. Or in one month from now. Whenever it's ready. NAMY. (New Apps for the Mid Year); I'm totally starting a new cooler party. :Thmbsup:

54
Awesome, good to know. I'm just making sure there's no shady business going on as seems to have become a bit of a recurring trend surrounding lifetime licenses. :)

Also, apologies for not reading back and checking the topic. I'm kinda tired at present. xD

55
Warning, pessimist at work!

What kind of track record does this company have regarding 'lifetime licenses'? Is the license for all versions of the suite, forever? Or just version X?

How about 'we stop putting out updates for old versions of the software; upgrade (with $$$) if you want more of your free updates' and so forth?

Throughout the years, I've started seeing 'lifetime licenses' as an early indicator of a new 'replacement' product version coming out that won't be covered by said license.

56
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / N.A.N.Y. 2013 Idea
« on: December 02, 2012, 03:57 AM »
So I'm lacking the time to do the project I was hoping to work on for NANY 2013 (good thing I didn't pledge), but I have some half-finished scripts lying around that may be NANY worthy-ish if I can figure out packaging, library licenses and the sort. But I've got no clue if anyone has a use for it, hence this post here.

Do you video-edit using Sony Vegas but end up with source material it cannot read because it happens to have the form of a MKV container? Does the situation tend to end up in you finding a 'video converting tool' that transcodes and basically behaves like a lengthy full render cycle (= 'a lossy to lossier copy' with all the loss of detail that may have happened as a result)? Would you prefer to work directly off of the original material without any loss in image or sound quality?

Simply put, I am a detail-oriented ass, and if I can at all avoid re-encoding, I will avoid said re-encoding: that is how this script came to be. What my script does is basically use opensource tools to remux the file you give it to process into a more manageable format, which is basically like pouring the contents of a coffee mug into a tea cup. The end result is the same drink, except now you fit in with the local tea addicts. :)

  • The script will never transcode; transcoding isn't only messy business but it is difficult too. There's better tools for that than what I can create, and if you want to seriously video edit hopefully quality is your number 1 concern. So it works, or it fails.
  • It only deals with one video stream and one audio stream at present. If necessary, I can look into viability of transferring all audio streams over; I simply haven't needed that functionality.
  • Soft subtitles (ones that are not a part of the video itself) are not remuxed; I ran into some problems with this and didn't need it anyway.
  • If at all possible, the script outputs a MP4 container. In some cases though, this is not possible, and it outputs an AVI instead.
  • There's a good chance your files may be remuxable, but my script fails at it. There's a lot of nuances to video material, and I only made it work with the stuff I've come across thus far. If I end up releasing this, I'll do my best to try and support the remuxing of other formats as well.

I don't think there'll be any interest in this, but just in the off case there is... let me know. :)

57
Living Room / Re: Hello Strangers.
« on: November 22, 2012, 08:32 PM »
Regardless, we all wish you the best. Both of you please take the time to mourn, and more-so time to appreciate what you still have together. 8)

58
General Software Discussion / Re: Two classes of membership here?
« on: November 18, 2012, 02:25 AM »
Equally, mouser is not really as reasonable as many of us are depicting him with our words. This is typical behaviour for forum admins:

can't say I get the warmest feeling from the posts you have made recently

It's a common boss admin power statement and mouser's not above this.

...

It doesn't mean mouser should never use these words nor was he wrong/I'm morally against him stating these words. It's just the bare reality, we're not a 100% rational forum community.

...

(Bolding courtesey of me, so I can keep PaulKeith's words in context rather than focus on one snippet that serves my point. Snipping the rest though; it's too long a post! ;D)

So, PaulKeith, after reading that I am somewhat puzzled. On one hand, you are against mouser speaking out with his thoughts and impressions, which imo are as valid as anyone elses, simply because he is an admin and is easily misunderstood as him throwing his 'weight' around. On the other hand, you praise him for speaking along with all of us, in-depth and taking the time to involve himself as opposed to a more hands-off style of moderating and administering a forum. There is no perfect solution for something like this, and I don't think there ever will be either.

I myself have not read any of the other relevant topics, so I do not know who this 'clean' is on his normal account, nor do I need or want to know. However, from what I have seen, the negativity in this thread has not come from mouser or the moderators, but rather from the tone set at the beginning where all kinds of bad things are implied and suggested, thus basically putting mouser in a position where he either bows his head in apology, or slams down the hammer of the law and is called the not-so-benevolent dictator. (The apology happened, for those too lazy to read back.)

Or in other words: in my eyes, the way this topic started blocked off any kind of civilized discussion, pushing it towards the extremes of either defending or attacking, apologizing or punishing. Likewise, there are those who should have tried to avoid the 'protect mouser' mindset that PaulKeith referred to; it just reinforces the appearance of an established order that keeps newer members out. Neither 'side' contributed to having a discussion we can be proud of to have on this board. To summarize: politics season is over, and we can go back to normal now. :tellme:

We are all civilized people. Let's respect one another as fellow people, and discuss matters like equals. Because that is where our strength, both as humans as well as the Donationcoder community, lies. If we can't do that, haven't we failed the purpose of this forum? (In which case I wish that there'd be some hope left for humanity as a whole still... :))

59
General Software Discussion / Re: Add just missing fields to MP3s
« on: November 16, 2012, 05:44 AM »
I usually use mp3tag. Supports pretty much every file (mp3, flac, ogg, etc) and gives a handy editing interface that you can fully customize, even with custom tags. You can also automate tag extraction from or insertion into the filenames.  It's free and better than the large majority of free taggers.

I am not sure how you mean missing fields in this case, but for example, if I have an album in a directory, and only some have an artist set, then I can just click the drop down and it will let you pick from all the other files selected and apply that tag to all the selected files.

60
Personally, I'm not a fan of the Pro version. I once troubleshooted a friend who had it, and it ended up that the Protection module did some really derpy stuff, blocking websites it deemed bad loong after I had turned it off. The symptoms were of sites timing out, which usually point towards a network cabling or routing issue, but the problem was obviously more complicated given the specificify of things that were accessible and others that weren't.  (The kicker: I'm talking Google and similarly big sites.)

It took me a long time to figure out MBAM was causing it too, but eventually the troubleshooters super advanced diagnostics log thankfully pointed me towards some MBAM drivers that were running in a net-filtering context. (This after it repeatedly told me nothing was wrong, all seemed fine, etc.) Eventually, the trick that did it was rebooting the enire machine after disabling the protection module. Never ever did the interface ever give me a list of things that it was actively blocking, either.

After you deal with a 'bug' like that once, you simply don't care to get burned again. So I go with the free On-Demand-Scan for all my needs, and that's good enough, both for my PC and for keeping my stress down. xD

61
General Software Discussion / Re: Two classes of membership here?
« on: November 13, 2012, 11:59 AM »
So, I'm about as frequent a visitor and poster as one can get with the attention span of a kitte--- oooh, it's a ball of yarn! :)

Anyhow. My two cents as a long time, but pretty irregular participater, are as follows: this is a wonderful place, and to me it has that feel of that pub you drop in on every so often that you know most people by face, but that I simply don't get further than their first name with. They throw rounds of beer, I consume, and occasionally I throw a round for them. Could I do more, 'leech' less? Probably; but we all participate in a way we are comfortable in.

Fights are something that rarely happen here. I think the biggest thing that has happened surrounded the entire Circledock fiasco a few years back, and that was mostly due to members protecting eachothers rights and server costs getting a bit on the high side, so the maintainer of that simply went his own way. It wasn't pretty, but it was civil regardless.

Now, as for you.. I obviously know very little about you. You've got five posts, but I'll guess that this is a temporary account. However, everything you write has me grasping for straws. How can you not know the mouserer? Half the free-but-donations-are-very-welcome software on here is his work, amongst which are fan favorites like Desktop Coral, FARR, Screenshot Captor and more. He has his own forum section, posts daily, and probably has his grubby paws on every topic that pops up.

Finally, for as far censorship goes, I've seen it happen only once. And that was because the subject was simply getting too heated, and it left lingering attitudes of resentment that shone through in other discussions, leaving a fair number of users uneasy frequenting.

I don't know what got you in such a corner where DonationCoder seems like such a boogeyman, and I truly hope it isn't warranted. From what I have seen, it isn't, but I am not you and cannot say if you are overreacting, or whether you have a very valid point. :)

I hope mouser & litter will be able to put your fears to rest. :)

62
The problem with 'lifetime licenses' is that really all licenses for software that you buy are eternal. It isn't like a cloud service where you pay monthly or yearly. You buy that version and you have by definition a lifetime liense (as opposed to a time-limited trial).

So in this case, that company, while technically correct, is morally wrong. If you advertise with a lifetime license for a product that by the default definition is already a lifetime product, it is implied that you get free upgrades to future versions. Sure, nobody expects a Personal to upgrade into a Professional, buy 8->9? Or for example a Professional->Enterprise because stuff got slightly rebranded during an upgrade? Although I could understand 10->11 maybe not being covered anymore if a user has been able to get good use for several years from the lifetime license.

Don't be cheap, Audials. You wanted positive press and advertised with a lifetime license. Now back it up, or prepare to see it backfire belatedly. It isn't like this is a lifetime supply of a material product like cola, and there's companies that still keep their promises to deliver those 20 years after the fact.

63
Usually, a good way is to simply approach a company that offers a streaming service and ask for their help. A single event, ~100 people viewing.. it's chump change compared to some good publicity about helping a charity like that.

Mind you, you will still need a webmaster and other infrastructure to actually make a technical platform your event is based of off. Think of things like: donating online, somewhat professional looking video-editing, a big enough (and stable) pipe of internet connectivity capable of supporting your video stream, etc.

64
While I think games and such have a right to not be free, the fact it is the most gigantic market out there at present. If they continue to be locked to Windows and Mac, you'll have a monopoly. Today, we at least have the luck of installing what we want on our Linux and Macs, but in the future the giants want it all to go through their stores.

The sooner that Linux becomes at least a casual-to-frequent gamer platform, the better it is for the entire market, regardless of the closed status of the games themselves. Microsoft understood it very well once upon a time: an OS is useful without apps. And the more of a users needs can be catered to, the more successful the OS will be.

65
I personally think Microsoft is making a gigantic mistake. The majority of workplaces need real computers, and not tablets. Or rather, they need keyboard and mouse; a tablet is simply too cumbersome to type with, and a touch screen keeps getting dirty, smudgy and is generally hostile to anything that's not a cleanroom.

Tablets may be nice for consumers to read books, view train/bus information or play leisure games. Smartphones are useful for people who need to communicate small things on location (mail men for example). But the bulk still happens on machines that are optimized for receiving input. Tablets are too awkward. Phones are even worse.

If this continues, I see Ubuntu or another Linux platform really taking off in the upcoming years. The big players are shafting the users that need to stuff get done, and once people switch to Linux, they can stay there indefinitely. Microsoft especially is an idiot; they get so many Windows licenses that make them tons of $$$, simply because people need them to do their work. Once people switch to OSS, they'll start losing that, and I can already hear the complaints coming.

Each device needs to be optimized for its own purpose and the input it receives. Don't put stupid tablet UI on a desktop; big screens are for consuming a lot of information quickly, and mice are heavily dependant on the infinite zones that are the corners and edges of the screen (which are now fucked with slide out menus). MS had to learn that lesson once upon a time with the Start button, but apparently they've forgotten it as they are now making the 'Close Window' cross a pain to hit.

If they want to make the interfaces look similar, so everything feels familiar and known to users, that is fine. Traffic authorities do the same thing with traffic lights, sign colours and fonts and all that stuff. But you don't seem them throwing round-abouts on every highway exit because having the same sort of roundabout everywhere makes stuff simpler for drivers.

Form and function, not fluffy and frustrating. Thx.

(Sorry, I needed to get this off my chest.)

66
I didn't even know Skype served ads in its call windows. I guess I'm on an old version that I won't be upgrading any time soon!

67
Without Javascript, there is no changing the page/DOM and all that smart logic stuff. However, if they're just going to go the 'process on server' route, then it shouldn't be necessary anymore.

Sounds like shitty changes for the purpose of either ad-revenue, data-mining, or worse... gross incompetency.

68
Win8 is just the latest take on the Active Desktop concept that Microsoft introduced after they missed the internet boat with regards to their Microsoft Network. AOL had something going in those days in the way of being the access portal of the internet (and still has some vestiges remain of that), and Microsoft wanted it. So IE, and that crazy channels feature, it all became a part of Windows. In the EU, they got their arses wiped because they cut out the competition.

Now they're doing it again. I truly hope the EU is on the ball with this one, and won't spend 5+ years coming up with an ineffective 'N' solution. It needs to be a hard 'keep the PC free for consumers; they own the thing!'

Alas. It's dark skies on that horizon.

69
General Software Discussion / Re: Does the browser Opera suck?
« on: October 14, 2012, 08:23 PM »
Opera is pretty decent; I call it my main browser. Compared to the horrible snail that is IE (opening a tab simply takes waay too long, nevermind all the other jerky shit) and the update disaster / incompatibility train that is Firefox, I'm more than happy with this one. I use Chrome on my old laptop, but only because I don't care too much about my privacy with that one; I simply don't trust Chrome (or its 'clean' alternatives) with my daily browsing.

70
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Pledge: Track My Stuff!
« on: October 12, 2012, 02:27 AM »
I personally think TaoPhoenix has a pretty useful insight, and it is one I've subnconsciously followed for all of my apps as well. Many apps that are created are something that is easily done in Excel or Access, and as a consequence, they also tend to be apps that have been created a hundred times before in slightly different formats. In only a minority of the cases, these apps actually do something different enough to warrant existing; in the rest of the cases, the Coding Snack guideline of looking for something existing rather than making something new would seem to be a useful one to follow.

But hey, let people contribute what they want! If they have fun with it, and someone else has a use for it.. then that's all that's needed, right?

71
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: And so it begins.. NANY 2013
« on: October 11, 2012, 07:11 PM »
Is there an English-Mouser rosetta stone yet?!    :o

I don't know; I'm most definitely not writing one. Mouser would probably ban me because I'd make it start with the input "Hello, Donationcoder!"  :D

72
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: NANY 2013 Pledge: Track My Stuff!
« on: October 11, 2012, 05:37 PM »
Suuuuuuure. That's what I tell myself, too.

(Good luck. You'll need it! ;D)

73
N.A.N.Y. 2013 / Re: And so it begins.. NANY 2013
« on: October 11, 2012, 05:27 PM »
Almost time? Pffft. That's mouserese for 'Oh, I'm right on time.' after certain people remind him there's nothing on the forums about it yet...  ;D

74
General Software Discussion / Re: Difficulties with JottiQ & Virus Total
« on: September 11, 2012, 01:35 AM »
So, I only see this one now by accident because it recently got kicked up... but for as far JottiQ is concerned, I can't explain why the OP got the errors he got. Perhaps Jotti was having issues, or perhaps there is an interfering entity between his computer and Jotti.

One other thing that could have interfered is a virus on the computer itself. For example, many rootkits, viruses or other malware will (try to) block Jotti and VirusTotal. Likewise, I would not be surprised if they were really anal and tried to block hashes of themselves from being transmitted, but that should be very unlikely given the fact that JottiQ uses HTTPS for its communication with Jotti.

Simply put... there are lots of possible reasons that stuff can't work like that.

75
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows Firewall (&co) headaches
« on: September 11, 2012, 01:22 AM »
I'm glad you guys find it useful. I hope you won't need it, but if you do, I'll be glad I posted it! :-)

Pages: prev1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23next