Messages - qforce [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 • next
1
General Software Discussion / Re: What is the currently best Desktop Search software?
« on: May 12, 2009, 06:32 PM »
DocFetcher 1.0 released. Comments are very welcome.  :Thmbsup:

New features:
- MS Office 2007 support
- Daemon with low cpu usage that watches indexed folders, but runs independently of DocFetcher
- Creating temporary indexes by rightclicking on folders in the file manager
- Portable version can be moved around complete with documents and indexes (i.e. DocFetcher + indexes + documents). You can even burn it on a CD-ROM!

2
General Software Discussion / Re: What is the currently best Desktop Search software?
« on: February 11, 2009, 09:32 AM »
C:\Program Files\Aduna -> 90MB
C:\Documents and Settings\UserName\Application Data\Aduna\AutoFocus 5 -> 366MB(this is where index files are maintained/stored)

As for RAM, that depends heavily on the usage: the smarter you build the query the smaller the RAM used and also the number of files resulted from an interrogation: 38.000 files displayed(all .html from all my sources) increased the RAM usage with 60MB...can start with 30MB and use as much as 100+MB.

HTH
-aenache36 (February 11, 2009, 09:21 AM)
Their RAM requirements seem to be very similar to that of DocFetcher.
However, I really wonder why they need so much disk space (are you sure there's no hidden office suite in it? :)).

3
General Software Discussion / Re: What is the currently best Desktop Search software?
« on: February 11, 2009, 09:24 AM »
100 MB of disk space for the program itself? This looks more like an office suite with built-in desktop search, if you ask me...
And 128 MB RAM is already half of what my Eclipse IDE (a very hungry beast) usually needs.
-qforce (February 11, 2009, 07:21 AM)

We're coming at this from very different perspectives: I have a 320GB harddrive and 4GB of RAM. The effect of this being installed on my computer would be minimal - like a flea on an elephant  ;D Most computers purchased in the past three years have at least 512MB (and more like 1GB) of RAM factory installed and probably more than 80GB harddrive capacity, so...
-Darwin (February 11, 2009, 08:51 AM)
Well, I didn't mean to stop anybody from using this program. If you think you have enough system resources to run this thing in the background permanently, that's okay with me. All I said was that the hardware requirements seemed a bit much for a desktop search program (e.g. Google Desktop's setup file was something like 2 MB, if I remember correctly), and it's certainly too much for my laptop here, which has 1 GB of RAM, minus 40% of that for the OS and the web browser, and when I fire up my IDE or a virtual desktop (Windows XP running inside a Linux machine  8)), there's not much left for a desktop search program of that magnitude.

4
General Software Discussion / Re: What is the currently best Desktop Search software?
« on: February 11, 2009, 08:44 AM »
100 MB of disk space for the program itself? This looks more like an office suite with built-in desktop search, if you ask me...
-qforce (February 11, 2009, 07:21 AM)

Greetings.

That is the size of the index file and not the program itself. Autofocus.exe(ver. 5.0 for MSWin) has 44,6KB...
Regarding RAM, as much as I could see is that Java is the hungry beast...

Best regards.
-aenache36 (February 11, 2009, 07:48 AM)
The DocFetcher.exe is 41,5 KB, but that doesn't mean anything, it's just a launcher. You really have to add up everything that is installed on the machine, and according to the website of Autofocus this sums up to 100 MB.

And what do you mean by "100 MB for the index file"? Maybe I'm missing something here, but the way I see it, if a file isn't the result of indexing, then it's part of the base installation (i.e. the program), right?

5
General Software Discussion / Re: What is the currently best Desktop Search software?
« on: February 11, 2009, 07:21 AM »
It looked fairly interesting until I read the hardware requirements section...
-qforce (February 10, 2009, 10:51 AM)

Hardware requirements

    * CPU: the absolute minimum is a Pentium II at 400 MHz, a Pentium III at 1 GHz or better is recommended.
    * main memory: minimally 128 MB, 256 MB is recommended.
    * disk space requirements: 100 MB + 2 MB per 1000 scanned items.

They don't seem that bad to me...
-Darwin (February 10, 2009, 11:37 AM)

100 MB of disk space for the program itself? This looks more like an office suite with built-in desktop search, if you ask me...
And 128 MB RAM is already half of what my Eclipse IDE (a very hungry beast) usually needs.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 • next
Go to full version