|
78
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Wierd Chrome browser behaviour; or Have I not been paying attention?
|
on: June 21, 2012, 08:33:51 AM
|
Nothing unusual. Main Process: Chrome's main process handles the UI, tab management and so on. Usually there is only one process that does the work. Renderer Process(es): The renderer handles rendering the page. Roughly, each tab consume one, but some special case make tabs into a single one - same domain uses same renderer, and no more than 20 renderer - newly opened tabs will use existing renderer if exceeded. Renderer Process runs in a sandbox that can increase security by separating in sandboxes. When one renderer crashes, other tabs or the main process will not be affected, and users will be able to reload the page by refreshing. Plugin Process(es): As plugins should have higher permission than a webpage, and in order to keep Renderer Processes in the sandbox, plugins are separated. Also when one crashes, other plugins or tabs or the main process will not be affected. Extension Process(es): Similar to the others, separating extensions into processes is to keep them in sandbox... and a crashing extension will not let the whole browser down. There is a built-in task manager for Chrome. Press Shift+Esc or "right click on title bar -> Task Manager" to launch it. You can see clearly - and may end processes if one's not responding. Ending processes this way will keep those addresses on your browser, with a "sad tab" replacing it, as mentioned in "Renderer Processes." You may have a look at http://blog.chromium.org/...process-architecture.html or read the Google Chrome comics http://www.google.com/goo...lebooks/chrome/index.html or for more: http://dev.chromium.org/d...ulti-process-architecture
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Udacity - free online education for real
|
on: June 19, 2012, 11:49:01 PM
|
|
@TaoPhoenix: You simply have to differentiate between education and schooling. I have all of both I'll ever need, but use little of it in my work (mostly the research and some math skills). If the person knows the subject, I'd take them over anyone highly "schooled." Universities had their millennium, but I hope they're coming to an end as we know them. At my age today, if you offered me a bachelor's degree with significant debt against my own self-motivated ability to learn online without a dime of debt, I would not go to college.
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: From ZDnet writer - Final Thoughts on Windows 8: A Design Disaster
|
on: June 17, 2012, 07:34:07 PM
|
I will not downgrade to a tablet when I can have a desktop PC. I thought the same, too, and I used a laptop for travel. But tablets got good in a hurry and, of all people, I was surprised at how useful the device could be in the field. No, it won't ever replace a desktop, though you can dock one to a keyboard and mouse, you're still not (yet) using a robust OS with it. For now, it's mainly a device made for reading, browsing, content consumption. For me it is difficult to grasp why anyone wants one. So you can take it anywhere and (only) consume content? And pay monthly fees for that besides the fee you pay for your ISP connection (which data transfer speed trumps the speed of your mobile device)? And do the consuming in any position you like? All of the above sound (financially) unhealthy to me, it is not for nothing you have ergonomic chairs, desks, keyboards and the like. No monthly fees unless you want it connected all the time like a phone; your current ISP connection is shared via wifi; no extra cost at all. All you need is the wifi versions (of a particular tablet) that can connect using any wifi connection; 3G or 4G connectivity is what you'll pay extra for. For your home, all that takes is switching to a wireless router, for instance, and voila! you've got wifi. Also, a tablet allows me to spend even more time in the bathroom, ha! It's also great to have a few books downloaded for offline reading when I know I'm going to be waiting on someone, on a plane, in a doctor's office, etc. I can read, play games, compose email, but most of the time in those situations you won't have a wifi connection. Which is why you should use the different parts in your house for their intended purpose only. No electronics in the room where I sleep, for example. I know we (me and the missus) sleep better because of that. Same with the kitchen, you cook, eat and have dinner conversation about how the day went with wife and kids, an "electronic" recipe is not allowed there (after all, the kitchen is the area where most accidents happen and I don't see a good reason to introduce expensive gadgets to those odds). Oh, I can't disagree with this at all. Put that gadget down and talk!
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: From ZDnet writer - Final Thoughts on Windows 8: A Design Disaster
|
on: June 16, 2012, 10:49:42 PM
|
|
I hated the ribbon, but I didn't realize it breaks down when using a finger. If I could use a mouse on my tablet, I would simply because my finger gets tired of the repetition, especially in forums and social network sites. And no matter how fancy various Linux window environments get, I tend to set mine to a Win7 (classic) look, which allows me maximum efficiency (1-click is better than two). Conflating desktop-tablet-phone into one UI is an idea that should have been shot down the first time it was mentioned. Microsoft's track record of every other release being a disaster is on schedule with Win8, and ironically, it's going to drive more people into the hands of Apple's closeted cult.
[attach]
At least with a/n Android or Apple tablet, you not only have the "It's-a-cool-toy!" factor, but it's quite the useful toy, making you wonder how you might spend less time in front of a traditional desktop whenever you're not working.
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
Other Software / Developer's Corner / Re: Help me think of a small ipad app idea to code
|
on: June 15, 2012, 01:39:29 AM
|
|
Isn't this the worst problem with iOS -- that it can only update one thing at a time? Android/google can update everything constantly, from apps to widgets to schedules, email, calendar, alarms, etc.
If the RSS idea doesn't fly, how about a simple calculator that doesn't suck? Most calculator apps are designed for specific fields, such as finance or stats or trig. Or perhaps a better loan calculator, for when you buy a car or anything else? (Both have been done a thousand times over, but not with a simple UI and inputs.)
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Google Stabs You in the Back...
|
on: June 03, 2012, 05:17:18 PM
|
And here's today's reaction: Marketers React To News Of Google Shopping Changing To Paid Inclusion With Hope & Concernhttp://searchengineland.c...h-hope-and-concern-123294“ Replacing Google Product Search with PLA [Product Listing Ads] allows us the opportunity to compete against the large players in categories that we believe we provide a better assortment or experience in, and back off on the ones that we don’t through adjusting our bidding strategies.” I want a better world. A free world. A world where information isn't propaganda. Information needs to be unbiased, and money is the ultimate bias. I so agree. But much of the current world is based on extraction and destruction (of the environment, creative arts, wealth, jobs, the future, hope, etc.). Google has been slowly sliding towards the dark side. I stopped advertising with them simply because they suck (and yes -- I have been advertising with them for many years and spent many, many thousands of dollars with them). I would encourage others to do the same. Drop Google. I think this is true only if you think Google is the center of the universe. Facebook, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft will gladly offer their counterarguments. I hate their monopoly stuff and when their fanboys cover it up with some dumb defense. (ramaya.na movie is not accessible on any other browser than chrome.) So they're going to force people to use google laptops, google storage and now google browser only. I am sure apple and google fanboys will defend this with yet another excuse. I'm completely against any forced browser limits by anyone. But google doesn't make laptops. Hey, but "information wants to be free" until some country asks Google to censor their search for them!  <-- Corporations will do everything we let them do, but now that they own governments, it's too late. (The next ACTA, CISPA, SOPA will arrive sooner than you expect, trust me.)
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Fedora/Microsoft - Embrace, Extend, Assimiliate
|
on: June 02, 2012, 04:09:13 AM
|
|
Don't think that Microsoft didn't come up with this "option" -- mandate in their terms -- not to piss off everyone else, but notably to make it virtually impossible to convert a store-bought machine from Windows ever again. It reminds me again that Microsoft can't make an honest buck from innovation, so they're shutting themselves inside their own little ecosystem of horrors where, if you don't join them, they'll impose yet another "Microsoft tax" ($99) on you.
Most everything evil on this planet in this century has been implemented under the guise of "security." Keep fighting the bastards, I say.
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Is Linux just a hobby?
|
on: May 23, 2012, 02:13:03 PM
|
|
@Josh: Remember, too, that to this day, if I visit a large retailer to buy a computer, I'm also forced to buy a copy of Windows I'll never use. That's legal theft. And now Microsoft is rocketing toward the closed Apple model. Good luck with that in these times.
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Is Linux just a hobby?
|
on: May 22, 2012, 02:02:34 AM
|
I'll give this topic a crack. Thank you, dantheman, for the opportunity. ____________________________________________ I've spent some considerable time over the last week trying to get into Linux, especially with LinuxMint which seems to be the second best after Ubuntu. First, Mint is the fattest and heaviest of all the Linux distros. Bring lots of hardware and GPU power if you're going to run it. By "second best" I assume you mean second most popular. Linux popularity of any given Linux distro ebbs and flows. While Debian is quite fine, I contend that Ubuntu is about the worst introduction someone can have to Linux, especially if they think all of Ubuntu's problems are shared among other distros. I really like openSUSE and Fedora, but tend to use openSUSE at home simply because it's good, boring, and quite productive. [attach]This is also why I suggest you take your time with Linux. Immersion is best, but install it on a second machine if you have one and do similar tasks that you perform on your Windows system. If you're looking to switch full time to Linux, then fine. If you're merely dabbling for the fun of it, then you're always going to think Linux comes up short. Back in '05-'06, I spent almost a year playing with a few Linux distros because of my dissatisfaction with Vista and then the prospect of having to buy yet another Microsoft OS in Win7 that I didn't want. I knew what I wanted from my computer and what I could live without. Turns out, though, that I have a lot more software available right away with Linux than I ever did with Windows. From calculators to text editors to image editors and viewers to HTML editors, vast set of programming tools at hand, choice of file systems for my HDs, superior file management, stupid-easy installation and upgrades (online, network, DVD, CD, LiveCD), games - yes!, renamers, disc burning, and on and on -- all free. openSUSE not only gives me a help file built into the distro, but access to their community forums to get any question I have answered. In the end, using Linux is about choice. You get to choose: -- Your distro based on your personal preferences, your hardware, or any other need, productive or otherwise. -- Which desktop environment you like, even if you want it to perfectly mimic Win7 or OSX! -- Which software you use and how you'll use it, not a corporation designed to bleed your wallet. -- When and whether you upgrade your system. -- What to do with all the money you save on anti-virus software scams, extra hardware requirements, etc. If you do switch, go all-in. If not, enjoy Windows. Most of your time is likely spent in the browser anyway; how you get there is your choice. 
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / What will be your next computer?
|
on: May 18, 2012, 04:53:27 PM
|
[attach]Built my last desktop a couple of months ago and figure it will last until desktops no longer exist (or are outlawed by "The Corporation"). Given the many OS and platform choices available, and the steady trudge toward appliance computing, I won't be spending big money -- i.e., more than I can afford -- for components ever again. Bought an ASUS tablet (T201/android) like the one above earlier in the year and was pleasantly surprised at how useful the device really was. I figured I'd use it rarely, but its utility has been unexpected, especially in the workplace when traveling. The first 25 years of my computing life was spent performing productive tasks and downloading terabytes of movies, porn, music, most of which I couldn't find on those discs if I had a month to do so. Now I barely save anything; all I do is read, research, and various social communications.
|
|
|
|
|