|
13
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Gadget Fridays
|
on: November 17, 2012, 06:40:47 AM
|
|
As Renegade said, boiling is boiling - doesn't make one iota of difference whether stovestop or electric. Many electric kettles also have specific temperature controls, besides the obvious one of switching off when reaching boiling point. The "plastic" problem can be of concern, I can understand that. I've been boiling water in them for 40 years but as you rightly mentioned, electric metal kettles are available.
My point really (which I didn't mention) was that many people in the US do not know that electric kettles for home use are even available. I posted this gadget comment, as evidence of that fact came up in conversation again just yesterday. Ten years or so ago, it was unusual to find more than one (if you were even that fortunate) in common discount stores.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Does the browser Opera suck?
|
on: November 16, 2012, 09:51:52 PM
|
Certainly a few more than I normally keep open. This was/is Opera 12.11 RC1 1100 tabsData for you - Opera's just loaded a 1100 tab session (wide variety of tabs) with no issues at all. Memory nice and stable as expected at 8GB which isn't unreasonable for this size session, processor amazingly low at < 30% consistent during load, no anomalies in Opera:cpu (ECMA 5-6%; all others close to zero), Opera:Memdebug shows interesting but probably sensible figures (below**).
Quite a lot of NSL tabs but equally a lot of tabs opening without NSL so it's not universal. I'll update this aspect later, as well as watching for memory leaks (none obvious so far).
Opera is also COMPLETELY RESPONSIVE UNDER THIS HIGH LOAD, no slowdown at all. Might as well be using 20 tabs for all it shows. I need that for heavy duty work - Opera's always had raw speed and response, but has consistently been plagued by stability problems.
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Remember to make full drive image backups
|
on: October 14, 2012, 08:17:30 PM
|
Beside Acronis TrueImage's problems a while ago, is there another one you had in mind?
Acronis was a case in point. But we're talking about relying on the integrity of a single multi-gigabyte file. I suspect many 100s of gigabytes for many people. Not something I want to trust fully. I don't know how many of these tools are able to handle damaged clusters in an image file on a backup drive. Extracting individual files from an image sounds like a good way to risk damaging the integrity of the image.
This was answered by Carol, but your question surprised me seeing that extraction is referring to just reading data from an image file. Nevertheless, as long as you have your personal data backed up using any competent backup/sync tool, you can recover. Unless your machine is old, you can't buy a restoration disk from the vendor to put the OS back and you don't know how to get around that.
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Remember to make full drive image backups
|
on: October 14, 2012, 02:46:53 PM
|
Partition level back tools are somewhat unreliable - even if they offer file level recovery from their image backups. I'd add a 3rd level of backup. Use a folder synchronization tool to backup your important data folders to separate external drives or machines with shared folders. Make sure you do a one way sync - targeting the remote folders. That way, if you accidentally delete something, the deletion is not sync'd to the remote folders and you can reverse the direction of the folder sync to restore what was deleted. Or to delete from the remote folders what you intentionally deleted on the primary. Folder level synchronization is also very quick comparatively. There are free options for this as well as paid options. If this (conceptually) is difficulty for you to do, get a copy of Fab's AutoBackup 3 (EUR 4.90 or $6.50 ). Fabs "knows" about most of the default folders on all recent Windows releases and will backup your important stuff. You can also add separate folders to the backups. If you restore, it knows how to put everything back in the correct place even if you restore from backups made on an XP machine to a Windows 7 or 8 machine etc. Fab's backups are "full" backups, i.e. all your data files each time, so this takes a while. But if you start running of space on your target drive, you can delete the older backups. Fab's Autobackup tools
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: 2.5 GB for Opera - It's Not Running~! =D
|
on: September 01, 2012, 11:54:19 AM
|
Renegade, not sure what Opera release you're running, but a very recent fix removed the plugin process. Memory problem might be related. Most likely though, it's just some buggy plug in - which might be why the plug in process did not shut down. 12-02-snapshot-with-stability-fixIn Opera 12 we introduced out of process plugins to try to reduce the number of times plugins take Opera down. We now see that some Windows users are from time to time experiencing Opera freezing on pages with plug-in content. The issue has been investigated and we found the best short term solution to get Opera at a quality level we are comfortable with is to temporarily remove out of process plugins until we have a proper fix. 12.02 is now officially out though. Opera desktop team blogIt is a pity that opera:cpu does not include more data. We need an opera:tabs !!
|
|
|
|
|