|
2
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: CyberNetNews - Still alive?
|
on: February 16, 2013, 03:40:55 PM
|
Hey guys! We really appreciate all of your concern! Ashley and I are actually doing great, it's just that our focus has shifted over to her new site where I've been doing development work (in addition to my full time job) while she cooks and tests new recipes. We've been so focused on her site the last few months that we forgot to even post a status update on CyberNet letting everyone know what's going on. We finally got one up today though: http://cybernetnews.com/cybernet-status-update/Personally as a geek/developer I'd rather be doing the programming rather than the writing, and so having her write the posts/recipes while I do the development has been working out extremely. Not to mention the fact that I make out like a bandit when it comes to eating great food! 
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
DonationCoder.com Software / Find And Run Robot / Navigating network locations
|
on: September 23, 2008, 04:09:47 PM
|
|
Hey mouser! Find and Run Robot is really saving me some time at work, and I was wondering whether it would be possible to navigate UNC paths (a.k.a. \\computername\share\blah) with autocompletion? I'm sure it might not be as responsive as local paths, but it would still be nice to have. Or FARR should at least be able to recognize UNC paths, and then open them in Windows Explorer when the Enter key is pressed.
Just throwing an idea out there. Thanks again for making such a fabulous app!
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: CyberNet's birthday! And software giveaway!
|
on: December 05, 2007, 09:56:31 AM
|
|
We just wrapped up the contest and posted the winners. If any of you are interested in the SyncBackSE or Onlick apps from 2BrightSparks you should keep an eye out for a follow up post. The developers of that program said that they were impressed with the results, and are contemplating giving out more licenses for those who weren't selected.
And I'm not sure whether some of you noticed or not, but the giveaways were never restricted to just the first 10 commenters. We normally only gave away one of the licenses to a commenter in that interval to help reward those who check back frequently with our site.
Hopefully you enjoyed the selection of software as well. I handpicked all of the apps myself choosing only the programs that I knew our readers (and myself) would love. Everyone turned out to be happy with the results, so we might attempt to do stuff like this more often.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Special User Sections / General Review Discussion / Re: UltraEdit Review and Giveaway ($50 value)
|
on: October 16, 2007, 04:47:36 PM
|
I paid $62.95 back in May to upgrade to a lifetime license. This after being a UE user for close to ten years.
Looks like a straight lifetime license is $124.95.
Hey, wait! I just looked up the prices you mentioned and they are indeed right. The funny thing is that you can purchase the application for $49.95, and then buy the lifetime license for $62.95 = $112.90! You can save about $12 by not purchasing the lifetime license upfront. That's kinda funny. 
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Special User Sections / General Review Discussion / Re: UltraEdit Review and Giveaway ($50 value)
|
on: October 16, 2007, 04:43:09 PM
|
No, the lifetime licence is available, but it looks like you can only get it as an upgrade (I'm really not sure though). I bought a standard licence and then switched to the lifetime one after I realised that a couple of upgrades would cost more than the lifetime licence! Ahhh, I just saw the upgrade option and assumed that they no longer offered the lifetime license. I think I'll be picking one of those up in a few days. And a question I get asked ALL the time is whether I get a free license for software reviews like this. Nope, I normally don't. Any paid software that I review I've normally purchased myself. In the case of UltraEdit I was still in the trial mode.
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Special User Sections / General Review Discussion / Re: UltraEdit Review and Giveaway ($50 value)
|
on: October 16, 2007, 12:01:09 PM
|
Thanks for this, Ryan. I already have a lifetime licence so will let others more needy than myself post on your thread. I love ultraedit and use it primarily as a more powerful text editor (ie don't code with it or write html).
No problem, I didn't actually realize that they do lifetime licenses. Must have been a thing they did in the past?
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Have any web-based applications replaced desktop apps for you?
|
on: October 12, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
|
|
I definitely haven't grown fond of the online trend either mouser. Gmail is really the only online service that I use to store information, and aside from that there isn't much of my info online. The more things I have stored on my own computer the more control I have over them. If I had to access a document and a server was down I would definitely be frustrated, and that's not something I want to go through.
I do, however, use Flickr as a backup source for all 6,000 of my photos. They are among the most important data that I have, and it would truly be disappointing to lose those. Because of Flickr Pro's unlimited storage/quality/bandwidth I felt compelled to upload all of my photos there. That's one service that I really believe you get the most bang for your buck.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: What are your top 10 Tech/Software Blogs?
|
on: October 12, 2007, 04:59:57 PM
|
Thanks for the compliments Nosh! I wish I could post here more often, but we are definitely pretty strapped for time. We've never really posted what our schedules are like for working on the site, but here's a quick run down: Note: All times mentioned are in central time- Ashley and I are both working by 7AM each weekday, and are done around 7PM
- The first two hours of our day is typically spend finding what we consider to be the best news, and for that we go through close to 500 different feeds. In a days time we normally look through 10,000 to 20,000 feed items. It's really disappointing when we go through all of the feed items and don't find a single thing that interests us, which happens more than you would believe.
- We normally keep up on the news feeds throughout the day checking them periodically. In all we probably spend about 3 to 4 hours everday just going through feed items.
- We are normally done writing articles for the site by 3PM, and then...
- on Mondays we do some general maintenance to the site that typically takes a few hours. - on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays we knock out the CyberNotes articles for the next week. Yep, these are all written at least one week in advance. - on Friday we write extra articles that are posted on the weekends. We try not to write on the weekends so that we are able to get a break from the site.
- Our day kind of ends around 7PM, and that's when we normally eat dinner, watch a little TV, and such. Around 9PM or 10PM we will go around replying to the people who have left comments on our site and our forum, and that's normally when we stop at other sites as well. About an hour is spent doing this.
So we are definitely busy, but we're having a good time trying to build up the site. Hope I didn't bore anyone with this post, but I thought some of you might find it interesting as to what actually goes on in a day's time for a fulltime blogger. It's not quite the cakewalk that some people make it out to be. 
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: New interesting features for Firefox 3
|
on: September 12, 2007, 09:25:45 PM
|
Moar features! They've just post a mockup of the long awaited "Places" functionality in the Mozilla wiki. Here you have the boring details, for those who don't want to see the mockup  , and here the actual mockup, for those wishing to skip the useless jabbering of the wiki (hey, if you're not a Firefox developer, you shouldn't be seeing this  ). Looks pretty cool, although it strikes a strong resemblance of certain Microsoft application... Don't get me wrong...I love Mozilla. But part of their problem is that their interface mockup designer, Alex Faaborg, is overly talented and often gets people too excited about what may come in Firefox. In the end I don't think the stuff looks quite as good as what he initially designed.
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Switcher2: Expose Clone (Window Arranger) for Windows
|
on: September 06, 2007, 10:40:06 PM
|
PS obviously, the Live Preview option significantly increases Reflex Vision's RAM usage, but only when you're actually invoking it. It's VM usage is pretty steady at about 22 MB.
Yeah, the consistent polling of the windows is an intensive process in XP. Everytime there is a change in the contents Reflex has to redo the screenshot used to display it. Vista is different in that it manages your windows in a layered system where each window is assigned its own layer. This allows applications to efficiently grab the the current state of the window. No real arguments from me, Dirhael. They seem to have made it more stable and I haven't encountered anything that it won't show, but ultimately I simply don't care that much about being able to view my open apps like this. The default alt-tab coupled with the taskbar is all that I need.
That's how I was until I used the latest version of Switcher. I set it up to replace Alt-Tab, and it's nice because it shows wonderfully oversized previews of the windows. And thanks to the powerful keyboard shortcut editor I can make it behave exactly like Alt-Tab.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Switcher2: Expose Clone (Window Arranger) for Windows
|
on: September 04, 2007, 10:15:07 PM
|
|
Some of you are saying that there are similar apps for XP, but the Aero on Vista makes a huge difference on these. Often times I pull up the Expose view in Switcher just to see the progress on a file transfer, or to check on many things without actually switching over to the app itself. I never actually realized how useful the Aero interface could be until I really focused on using it...and that's when I realized its more than just eye candy.
And no, I'm not a Microsoft Fanboy. I use multiple distros of Linux on a daily basis, but in my opinion Microsoft did a much better job on Vista than everyone makes it out to be. Or I could just be lucky that I haven't had any problems *knocks on wood*
|
|
|
|
|