|
2
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
|
on: May 06, 2013, 12:50:13 AM
|
And that's why I said it seems your problem is Activision (publisher) vs. Steam (distribution platform). I got that, but I doubt the publishers could force an update through somebody elses platform. Pretty sure that's where Steam becomes culpable (remember, steam isn't in this for love). CoD hasn't really been a single-player game for a long time. They make their money because people play online. And so, day zero, the game is already outdated. That's a problem for physical sales. understood, but online or offline is irrelevant here because ALL physical sales are in the same boat. Who in their right mind would buy a product that won't work at all unless you spend 2 or 3 (or more) times your original purchase price with another provider before it will work (hmmmm, me apparently  )
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
|
on: May 05, 2013, 09:34:40 PM
|
Seems a shame that the nation that developed the Web infrastructure cannot seem to provide access to all its residents. But the software publishers are selling a product that is separate to internet. They assume that not only does everyone have access, but that it's gigabit access with unlimited downloads. I can understand online registration, but the rest of it is pretty presumptious, if not descriminatory.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
|
on: May 05, 2013, 05:56:18 PM
|
BTW, the 35GB install seems excessive - it only takes up 14.2GB on both my XP and Win7 machines. That was the disk space requirement stated by the installer. I thought it was excessive too - it was quite a 'What the?' moment when I was doing the install. Which third world country is the one you live in? For comparison purposes (and I really don't intend to brag, it's not good enough for that) even the most remote village in Turkey has reasonable (4-8 Mbit) dsl connections available, with unlimited data costing 30-40 dollars a month. If you agree to a data cap of 6GB per month you get to pay no more than 15$.
Australia. Not a third world country by any means, but a big country with a small population and lot's of 'empty' space. We live too far from the exhange to get DSL, and will never get access to cable, so our only options are dialup or wireless (or satellite...). Dialup is, well, abysmal, and wireless is sometimes not much better (it's recently been below Kb speed). But that's not the point. And as far as I see it it is a Steam problem. This my PC, Steam is a portal. If I want to buy or download something from Steam, I'll do so, and if I don't, I won't. My choice... As it stands, Steam presumes, and I get no say (I've already checked don't automatically update this product). Worse, there's nothing to indicate what it actually is that's being downloaded, ie it says game X is being 'updated', but there's no detail or description, nor is there anything to indicate how many such 'updates' might be required. Software patching is an accepted practice, but removing all options, including personal choice, is a bit extreme (I wonder what Renegade would say about that  )
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Steam, and customer satisfaction
|
on: May 03, 2013, 01:26:06 AM
|
Apologies to all 'cos I know this has been done before, but I really need to vent <RANT> As a gamer I'm a relative newcomer to the world of Steam, and I have to say I'm not seeing the value. Actually, it probably is an excellent model in many ways, but in others, well it's less than stellar I have, over the last couple of months purchased physical copies of several games (call me old fashioned, but I prefer to get something tangible when I hand over my cash), but for the most part I am unable to play them because steam won't let me!! Latest installment is CoD MW3. I couldn't even install it without a steam connection (hang on, didn't i just pay good money for this?). I live in a rural area so even connecting to Steam can be a trial. It eventually installed fine (EGAD!! requires 35G of disk space!!) but when I went to play, steam said, hang on, there's an update (WTF? I just paid for this and now you're telling me I can only play on your terms?). The update was only (!!) a few hundred Mb, so I let it update. Great, says I, now lets play. Oh wait says steam, theres another update, and its 14Gb!!!Are they serious? I mean I already paid for the game. What if I don't need, want or care to apply the updates? Don't I have some say here? I accept that there are going to be bugs (there always are) but most of the time they affect online and/or multiplayer usage. I play almost exclusively single player, and I never play online, so it's pretty rare for those sort of issues to be of any concern to me whatsoever. Why do I have to apply a 'patch' for something that's unlikely to change my experience in any way. In fact, by insisting on applying the update that's exactly what's happened. Then there's the issue of size (yes, size does matter). As I said, I accept that there are going to be bugs, but if you have to 'patch' 14Gb then you should be refunding peoples money 'cos there's something seriously wrong. Either that or you're peddling some serious bloatware (in which case you should ashamed of yourself, and you should refund peoples money). It's worthwhile noting that 14Gb is equivalent to 14 months of my data allocation. I could run over I suppose, but I'd to have to sell a kidney to cover the excess usage charges just to find out whether I can play the game, or that there are more 'updates'. I suppose I could invest in an additional data pack, but a 2 year contract makes this a pretty damn expensive game, and it would still take a few months to download it all. I've even searched for alternative sources for the updates, but no, it appears you can only get them through steam. Now I don't have an issue with Steam per se, as I said, in many ways it's an excellent model, but wouldn't we be far better served with something more like windows update where all updates are not only 'optional', but you can also see both what they are and how bloated big they are. and remember I said this is the latest installment? I can't even go back and play some of the other games I have installed because Steam has decided they all need patching as well, despite the fact that I've set ALL my games not to update automatically. Way to go guys... Anyone else have a complaint about steam? I'm sure I can't be the only one  whoa! form a queue people! </RANT>
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Seeking Little App w/Specific Actions
|
on: March 15, 2013, 01:52:12 AM
|
Well, most of my apps I have "assigned" to a specific monitor. When I install a new app, it takes me some time before I can decide which monitor it belongs to. Two things: all video is on the left. Web browser or anything I'm reading goes on the riight. so apps could be assigned to one of 2 lists (left or right) and they could be positioned accordingly. Anything else would float pending allocation Not sure what you meant by "all other movements are effectively random".
Two big things are high on my list. One is which monitor should an app appear, and of course some have to be tossed back and forth.
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: I am so very very sick of copyright issues.
|
on: March 13, 2013, 10:19:08 PM
|
I think a lot of this IP protectionism is indicative of a loss of confidence on the part of many. The only people that try (in my experience) to wring every last nickel out of everything they come up with are the people who fear their creativity is a finite resource. That they only have so much originality in them - and once it's gone, it's gone.
not quite, seems most of it is generated by people that have no creativity (accounting doesn't count) and are banking (literally) on wringing everything they can out of someone elses efforts, ie most any of the media vendors, publishers, the families and/or estates of long dead creators...
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Seriously 'funny' idea - what if DRM was applied to physical objects?
|
on: March 04, 2013, 06:36:03 PM
|
Um, this chair is a fire hazard.
Notice the smoke?
Yeah, that nichrome is getting too hot while melting the wax, the chair could ignite the flammable wax and cause a far more serious problem than just a DRM'd chair.
Are you trying to say that people that buy the chair are just looking to get burned? clearly if you get to that stage you must be a pirate, so this is justified of course the flow on from this is that all chairs that don't catch fire are a)infringing on their patent, and b)clearly the work of pirates. Either way, legal action will have to be taken to bring the culprits to heel
|
|
|
|
|