|
1
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: SSD's - How They Work Plus Tips
|
on: May 14, 2013, 03:59:05 AM
|
|
I have 5 tips to add:
1. Move the tmp folder to a hard disk. You shouldn't use your valuable write cycles for temporary files.
2. Move (if you must have one) the page file to a hard disk. I have 4 gigs of ram on my win7, I sometimes get the insufficient memory notification when firefox leaks too profusely and I try to play world of tanks at the same time. With 8 gigs you wouldn't see even that one. So page files are mostly redundant if your specific needs (using photoshop to prepare 10m x 24m banner prints etc.) don't dictate it, get rid of the page file. But if you must have, move it to a hard disk.
3. Move firefox (or ie, or chrome, whatever) cache to a hard disk. Yes this will make it somewhat slower, but your SSD's write cycles would be spared. If the speed penalty is too much, disable on-disk caching completely. On-memory caching will probably do (it does for me).
4. If you use a mail client such as outlook, thunderbird, bat, eudora etc., move the mail storage to a hard disk. Yes, it will degrade performance, especially when you need to search among thousands of mails, but it will help the longevity of the SSD.
5. If you have a busy database running on your computer (you may not even be aware of it. For instance I use Trados, a computer assisted translation tool, and it runs on top of a database.) you may consider moving it to a hard disk. The performance hit will be immense (depending on your usage pattern) though. I don't use this trick personally. I would not want to waste 10-20 minutes a day just to extend the life of a $80 SSD drive by 10%. But if you can bear the performance hit, you can extend the life of the drive.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Internet Sales Tax Passed
|
on: May 08, 2013, 01:39:28 AM
|
|
But online stores do not have to pay for fancy store designs, store rent, franchise fees, and salaries of as many staff as brick and mortar thingies have to employ.
I'm curious what will be the next argument of those who are feeling the brunt of obsolescence.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Steam, and customer satisfaction
|
on: May 03, 2013, 03:42:40 AM
|
|
I feel your pain and agree that it is not fair to make you download further (and ridiculously huge) stuff to let you play the game you bought.
But I need to ask one thing:
Which third world country is the one you live in? For comparison purposes (and I really don't intend to brag, it's not good enough for that) even the most remote village in Turkey has reasonable (4-8 Mbit) dsl connections available, with unlimited data costing 30-40 dollars a month. If you agree to a data cap of 6GB per month you get to pay no more than 15$.
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Office 2013 drops cleartype, fonts a disaster. Any way to fix it?
|
on: April 25, 2013, 08:29:45 AM
|
Any way to fix it?
Apparently none. You have basically two options: a) Fall back to 2010 (2003 I'd prefer, but not everyone is as old fashioned as me) and wait for microsoft to get its act together. Win 8.1 is supposed to fix some of the absurdities of 8, so can office 2015 help with idiocities of 2013. Yet MS may not return from the stupid track it is decidedly embarked upon, so this option may not work. b) Get on the libreoffice bandwagon, and try to hold your temper when it does not open .doc files accurately. Recent 4.0.x version is much better than 3.x thingies, so you probably won't come across such horror scenarios though. I'm going to use 2003 for a year or so, and when I finally upgrade this machine circa 2008, I'll move on to libreoffice.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Worst Javascript/other intrusions?
|
on: April 19, 2013, 03:46:12 PM
|
If you're going to block javascript, use noscript or don't bother. And it's really not that much bother once you get into the habit. You can't really call ghostery an "adblockplus" spinoff, they do quite different (and complimentary) things. The next step is RefControl+RequestPolicy... this does add a fair amount of management overhead for first-time visits to new sites, but IMHO it's worth it... you'll end up blocking a crapload of stuff that even ABP+Ghostery+NoScript misses. You'll also want to turn RC+RP off temporarily if you're shopping, because it's way too much bother once credit-card handling stuff is involved... but it's really nice armor for your everyday surfing  And wear a condom at all times you surf the web. A radiation suit would also be useful. And have 3 bodyguards close by, as well as a secret service evacuation protocol. Are you serious or are you just being sarcastic?
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Worst Javascript/other intrusions?
|
on: April 19, 2013, 12:44:18 PM
|
|
Just put a yesscript button on firefox's toolbar. Right click on the toolbar, go to customize, find yesscript's button, it looks like this:[attach]
Drag it and drop on Firefox toolbar. When you feel the need to use it, just click on the button while the naughty page is open. The button will now turn to brown. Reload the page (f5) and voila.
It won't forget which sites you blacklisted, so it's very handy. If you need to delist a site, just click on the button while it's brown. It will be removed from the blacklist again, and the button will return to its original color.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Worst Javascript/other intrusions?
|
on: April 19, 2013, 12:27:51 PM
|
|
I usually use it to block search assistance offered by google (don't guess me when I type words into a search box, I know what I'm looking for), or similar useless javascript junk. It's efficient, does the job well, and doesn't break the web by default as noscript effectively does.
I really don't understand why people see this as an "all or none" business. Noscript is like an a-bomb, too powerful to be of any practical use. Yesscript is more of a taser gun. You can actually use one if you need it.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Google Reader gone
|
on: March 26, 2013, 07:42:34 AM
|
Digg have plans:
Down with the cloud, and down with any cloud-based plans. I have 40 years to live [at the outside], and I believe I can make do with my desktop based paradigm for that period. Dad was able to find a typewriter repairman 3 years ago, I am sure I can find spare parts for my computer in 2050.
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: Google Reader gone
|
on: March 14, 2013, 12:57:13 PM
|
Thanks for the suggestions. After some consideration I decided to go with bamboo, a firefox add-on. I will not use another cloud service if I can help it, and separate desktop applications did not look very handy, as I usually jump to a site after seeing a headline on the RSS feed aggregator. So a firefox add-on seems like the best solution. Yes, I'm aware of the advantages of cloud solutions. For example if I don't run firefox for a week or two (i.e. vacation in the mountains) I'll miss some feeds. And I won't be able to check feeds from another computer/phone etc. But I'll have to live with the former, and I don't do the latter anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Google Reader gone
|
on: March 14, 2013, 08:23:14 AM
|
Google Reader's gone the way of dodo. Google willfully axed functionality (sharing etc.) from Reader to boost google+, a product no one demanded, and now it's axing Reader completely on the grounds of falling usage. Way to go Google. You really inspire confidence in all your users. Any desktop RSS aggregator recommendations? I certainly will not invest time and effort in another cloud junk. Experience, after all, is learning a lot of things you shouldn't do again.
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / Living Room / Re: "Half of our users block ads. Now what?"
|
on: March 10, 2013, 08:21:26 AM
|
|
There are ads, and there are irritations. Anything that moves on a web page (other than videos which I specifically press play on) is a source of distraction and/or irritation. So I block them all without any conscience suffering.
Blocking just the animated/irritating stuff is more work then I intend to put up with, so I use universal ad filters such as fanboy's list or easy list. If non-intrusive ads are collateral damage, so be it.
|
|
|
|
|