|
2
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: General brainstorming for Note-taking software
|
on: December 15, 2012, 01:49:28 PM
|
|
Hello,
I have tried a few of these, including Keynote, OneNote, TreeDBNotes, Rightnote, Cintanotes, Evernote, and Simplenote. My work primarily revolves around design and journalism. So, I have always felt the need for a software that would be a good mix of collecting abilities, hierarchical categorization, live search and lately 'anywhere access'. Am yet to find one that provides a good mix. Righnote and Simplenote is what I use now.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
News and Reviews / Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Image viewer speed benchmark
|
on: September 28, 2011, 02:24:57 PM
|
|
I find viewers that create a database a less than optimal solution. The vast majority of the quicker viewers create a cache or database file. While some of them have an option to turn off caching, display speeds take a hit.
The only one that doesn't cache is Irfanview.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: InfoQube & TreeSheets: Information managers of the future
|
on: August 31, 2011, 03:43:14 PM
|
PIMs have been one my fancied applications for at least 10 years now. Over the years I have moved from ECCO to KeyNote and then to Infoselect. I did also try Zoot for a while, and used to love its Zooter and auto-categorizing. Later I moved to a combination of OneNote and CintaNotes. Although I have never been quite happy with OneNote, I have not found a good replacement yet. CintaNotes is good for what it does. PIMs are probably one of those products that a lot of moderate and power users may use. In their variety, I find this class of applications very similar to ToDo List applications. There are a multitude of products out there, each with its own strengths and quirks. Every few months a lot of new products show up with a lot of promise but quickly languish for lack of development. Based on your posts and opinions, I tried out RighNote, and it definitely looks good. Every time I see a new review, I eagerly look up the application, but I almost always come down disappointed. A few features I look for are: - Auto categorizing of incoming content – Zoot was wonderful with this
- Search as you type (live search) – InfoSelect did a great job with search filtering
- Sync across multiple devices – have an online option.
- Quick and snappy, with a small footprint
I guess Aram (SuperboyAC) had these listed in his Notetaking Software roundup. Like many of you, a good PIM that works for me will remain a distant dream, quite like that Indian parable of a mongoose with half a golden coat.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Using a Desktop Search through the network
|
on: January 20, 2009, 01:52:46 PM
|
In our community-run library, we have about 20 computers connected through a LAN. Between them, we have upwards of 150,000 files stored on four computers. These files are of format .doc, .html, .pdf, .txt, .xls and .msg. We've been trying to come up with a search solution that will allow users (who are decently computer savvy) to search all the files, and them access them over the network. Is it possible to: - Run a freeware desktop search on the central server and access the search engine on the local LAN?
- Index network drives of four computers, and make them searchable?
We tried to implement this using Google Desktop with a web-server called DNKA ( http://dnka.com/). Unfortunately, the latest version of Google desktop that DNKA 0.49 supports is GDS 4.2006.0627; we need to use GDS 5, or later.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
DonationCoder.com Software / fSekrit / Search as you type (or incremental search) in fSekrit
|
on: August 16, 2008, 01:01:48 PM
|
For a while now, I've been looking for an encryption tool that allows me to store data in a text file, and provides reasonable security. This is because, on occasions, I've to share my desktop, and fSekrit fits the bill. But, one feature that I'd love to see is incremental search. As Jef Raskin so eloquently put it, "A search is either incremental or excremental."  Do you feel it is doable? I understand it may go against the keep it small and simple philosophy of fSekrit, but...
|
|
|
|
|