|
4
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
|
on: November 12, 2012, 02:56:51 AM
|
Most mouse and keyboard sharing solutions, we are aware of, use the TCP network data protocol to transmit mouse cursor and keyboard input updates: TCP is packet-based. TCP packets have a pre-defined static size. TCP transmits packets only if they are fully packed (in the particular application, data updates have to match the defined TCP packet size in order to be dispatched immediately) or after a time-out. If your mouse/keyboard data update packet doesn't fill up a complete packet, TCP waits for the next packet to finish the pending packet or waits for the time-out to dispatch the data -> Laggy cursor. Possible solutions: 1. Reduce the TCP time-out parameter which will slow down your whole TCP transfer as small unfinished packets with a lot of packet overhead will entertain your wires. Too small values may stall your switch/router/network adapter. 2. Use a dedicated network connection between your computers to isolate mouse and keyboard data from other TCP traffic and experiment hours by tweaking the TCP packet size to matches the mouse/keyboard data update size. I actually don't know but hope for you, that Synergy uses data updates with static size to allow you matching with the TCP packet size. Otherwise you have to deal with a target that moves faster than a bullet. Good luck. For people, who have things to get done, other makers invested man-years to develop a custom protocol that is optimized to meet special requirements of mouse and keyboard sharing. Sometimes, pearls do not shine on the surface but under the hood. 
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
|
on: November 11, 2012, 11:38:27 AM
|
I'm sure software such as yours makes it very easy to post this sort of thing rapidly and efficiently I am glad, that you explore potential uses for our software. But to be honest, I haven't used PhraseExpress for my posting. It was a hand-made text and a boilerplate template manager doesn't help too much. PhraseExpress may just have corrected a few typos or expanded frequently used single words. However, the complete sentences are too specific to be saved as a text snippet. As you are so passionate about following our communicaton over the whole internets so closely, you may consider to subscribe to our Twitter account. Just in case you want to stay up-to-date.
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
|
on: November 11, 2012, 07:02:29 AM
|
Dear " Clean", We are happy, that your experience with our Text Expander "PhraseExpress" convinced you to use our latest software "ShareMouse" as well. Your continued loyalty over many years is appreciated very much.  Thank you for your compliments about our support offerings. We are getting hundreds of freeware user inquiries, ranging from requests to analyze users sophisticated networking environments, to fix enhanced automation scripts or even to develop those for them free-of-charge. We appreciate your understanding, that we unfortunately do not have the resources to provide unlimited free consulting services for our freeware offerings. Those are provided "as-is" on a complimentary basis. We actually do provide technical support for our freeware users for issues, which are helpful for the general userbase. The forum is used as a dynamic FAQ in this regard. We are sorry, if your particular requests have not been falling into this category, but again, you are using a complimentary offering and we appreciate, that you to take it as such. -- Your choice of alternatives is just fine. There are hammers and there are other hammers. Both are a tool. You probaby don't need to save text formatted text snippets or use a Mac to realize, that different tools are different (in many more ways). User requirements are different, too.
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Main Area and Open Discussion / General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
|
on: November 09, 2012, 04:58:00 PM
|
It's from Bartels, so please see any thread world-wide where some of Bartels' products is treated, Bartels himself quickly intervenes, and in a way you won't believe your eyes. Thank you, that you recognized our responsiveness and dedication to our software and users. I tried ShareMouse, got a problem with it, kindly requested their opinion about it, and never got a reply. We are running a public support forum and I couldn't find any unanswered inquiry. Could you please provide a link to your posting? I will make sure asap, that your inquiry will be answered. Furthermore, it's about 30 dollars plus VAT PER COMPUTER ShareMouse cost USD 24.95 per computer and I am happy to annouce, that GAOTD BdJ will run a $10 promotion very soon. Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Other Software / Found Deals and Discounts / Re: PhraseExpress Pro with 70% discount - Celebrate with Us!
|
on: November 08, 2011, 02:37:47 PM
|
setting paste method per application 1. Duplicate the phrase(s) which need application-dependent paste methods. 2. Apply the desired paste method via the #pastemethod macro function to one instance of the phrase. 3. Restrict that instance to the desired specific program(s). 4. Exclude the other instance of the same from the desired programs (as defined in 3.). Voila. This solution is not suitable for a larger number of phrases though. -- I kindly ask you to post future technical support questions to our support forums as I do not permanently monitor this forum and you will get faster response times when posting directly in our forum. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Other Software / Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Share your mouse and keyboard with multiple Mac or Windows computers
|
on: September 29, 2011, 04:53:17 AM
|
Could someone tell me if any of these programs works with 2 computers on different LANs? (same question as in my previous post)
I'd recommend to use a dedicated shared network connection for a Software KVM solution. ShareMouse (like other solutions) won't be able to hop across separated networks without quirky work-arounds. There may be good reasons why your network is separated (security?!) and you probably ask for trouble and performance loss if you try to link them. -- By the way, we are now working on drag & drop of multiple files between Mac and Windows PCs. We will perhaps be able to post a demo video later today. Can't wait to show it to you guys. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Other Software / Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Text Expander for Medical Transcription and general purpose
|
on: September 27, 2011, 04:57:04 PM
|
A sort of flow control will be in the next PhraseExpress version. -- Instaphrase will be based on our core technology but presented in a new user interface which we had in mind for a long time already. Instaphrase will be for those who like many buttons, ribbons and a colorful user interface. But you are right, that Ribbons are a love&hate issue. This is why we don't build them into PhraseExpress. Many users tell us not to change the user interface for good reasons. PhraseExpress aims to have the tidiest and cleanest user interface possible (if in Easy mode  ) to get the work done. We carefully balance the need of every button and every option before it makes it into the user interface. So we see little overlap in the userbase.
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Other Software / Announce Your Software/Service/Product / Re: Share your mouse and keyboard with multiple Mac or Windows computers
|
on: September 23, 2011, 02:29:12 AM
|
|
At first sight, ShareMouse seems to replicate the remote control feature of MaxiVista.
The core difference is, that in MaxiVista, the remote control mode is internally tied to virtual video drivers of the extended screen feature.
This difference leads to some significant benefits of ShareMouse, justifying a separate product.
* MaxiVista is Windows-only. ShareMouse supports Windows and Mac OSX.
* ShareMouse works bi-directional. MaxiVista is master-slave based.
* In MaxiVista remote control mode, the virtual video driver is always active in the background, preventing Aero. ShareMouse does not have a video driver and has no effects on Aero.
* MaxiVista is limited to 3 monitors. ShareMouse supports an unlimited number of monitors and computers.
* MaxiVista does not allow to position the monitors with slight shifts. ShareMouse provides any possible monitor positioning.
* ShareMouse will get many remote control related special features that we won't implement into MaxiVista as the main focus in MaxiVista is extending the monitor screen to a 2nd Win/Mac PC.
Hope, this helps.
|
|
|
|
|