The best one I found is this one: Brain Focus
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So this gamebooster does everytyn you want except activate automatically?-r0bertdenir0 (June 08, 2009, 09:09 AM)
Not exactly - I don't really need all of gamebooster's functionality, what I do want is a way to create sets of application that when an application of a specific set is activated all application in the opposite set are shutdown, and when the application is complete, those apps will be started up again (using command line switches that were previously defined).
So the application will have a list of application definitions, most of these would be windows startup stuff, but can be modified manually:
resource monitors (cpu, harddrive, etc..)
quick launchers / autohotkey scripts
IM clients (Messenger, Google Talk, Digsby, etc..)
this list will have the process names and initialization parameters defined (can be taken from the registry of manual).
Another list - an applications watch list. These will be the high resource consumption stuff, like multimedia and games.
Whenever an application in the watch list activates, the applications on the 1st list will shutdown and free up resources and hotkeys etc.
as to Gamebooster - it's fine - but it doesn't let you define the list of stuff to shut down.
Hope I got it simpler now.
What I'm suggesting is more control when the application are starting up. It will give you last-minute intervention when the startup has begun.-GSz (June 05, 2009, 12:57 PM)
I didn't get it, sorry. Anyway, the last-minute intervention using the Graphical Launch Type is not sufficient? I'm using it all the time.-yksyks (June 05, 2009, 01:12 PM)
- yes, so am I. But I *expect* the expressed need is to immediate add those program you disabled some previous time the editor was open. This you cannot do, for now, until the ongoing startup procedure had ended.That's a great idea that was implied by what I described, but you put the idea out there, thanks.-Curt (June 05, 2009, 02:46 PM)
Are we using the same version 2.5.138? The check-boxes are already there, exactly as you want them!-yksyks (June 05, 2009, 03:09 AM)