Messages - oversky [ switch to compact view ]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 • next
1
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Qiqqa - Reference Management System - Mini-Review
« on: March 28, 2013, 04:56 AM »
I tried this several years ago. So my experience is based the old version.
There are somethings that I don't like
1. Qiqqa save the OCR result in the database, instead of in the corresponding PDF.
2. Qiqqa is designed to use the internal pdf viewer. But I prefer to use PDF XChange.

PDF XChange can perform OCR and save the result in the PDF.
This makes Qiqqa less attracting.

2
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Google Reader - Mini-Review
« on: March 14, 2013, 10:55 PM »
I'm trying out @40hz's suggestion re Sage. in the discussion: Re: Suggestions for a RSS reader
I've long since given up on something that's all-in-one.

These days I use the Sage extension in Firefox as my RSS reader and save what I want to keep to my Pocket (formerly ReadItLater) account or using Scrapbook depending on what it is.
None of the above have much in the way of bells & whistles.
Which is exactly the way I like it. YMMV. ;)
-40hz (December 23, 2012, 08:50 PM)
-IainB (March 13, 2013, 08:35 PM)

FWIW I'm still using the FF+Sage+Pocket+Scrapbook combination. And I'm still perfectly happy with it. :Thmbsup:

(And I've tried every feed reader I could lay my grubby mitts on that ran on either Windows or Nix in the meantime. Have yet to find anything I like better or which offered some feature so compelling that I absolutely had to have it. YMMV  :))


-40hz (March 13, 2013, 08:42 PM)

I suggest you try Brief extension. I think it is much better than  Sage.
http://bit.ly/WiejA8

3
General Software Discussion / Re: OCR - comparisons of different software/capability
« on: October 15, 2012, 10:15 PM »
Can you provide the original ttf? I would like to test it with other OCR. Thank you.

4
General Software Discussion / Re: Looking for a "virtual scanner' software in one pass, outputting in PDF.
« on: February 23, 2012, 04:00 AM »
Edited : the reason I want to use an image format rather than a text format is to avoid any possible error when converting the .doc file to the .pdf format, such as font missing and substituted by another one, etc. .  So far, all "regular" word to pdf software show a few errors here and there.  I really want a 100% perfect copy within the pdf, whatever font/text/image is used in the source document.
-MerleOne (February 21, 2012, 09:12 AM)
-tomos (February 23, 2012, 03:48 AM)

How do you know the word to image process is perfect as you do not capture screen now?
Do you have some test doc file for share?

5
Screenshot Captor / Re: Screenshot Captor Auto Upload/ftp/imageshack/dropbox/etc using ZUploader
« on: February 23, 2012, 01:46 AM »
Yes, this works.
Get author support in 5 minutes.
What more can I ask?
Thank you.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 • next
Go to full version