Welcome Guest.   Make a donation to an author on the site November 21, 2009, 02:25:22 AM  *

Please login or register.
Or did you miss your validation email?


Login with username and password (forgot your password?)
Why not become a lifetime supporting member of the site with a one-time donation of any amount? Your donation entitles you to a ton of additional benefits, including access to exclusive discounts and downloads, the ability to enter monthly free software drawings, and a single non-expiring license key for all of our programs.


You must sign up here before you can post and access some areas of the site. Registration is totally free and confidential.
 
Read the Practical Guide to DonationCoder.com Forum Search Features
   
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Change Function: Why some technology ventures fail?  (Read 2133 times)
mouser
First Author
Administrator
*****
Posts: 21,839



plarker mouser see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« on: May 16, 2006, 09:48:37 AM »


Quote
...
The attractively simple thesis of The Change Function is that most tech-nology ventures fail because tech-nologists manage them. Technologists think their business is the creation of cool technologies loaded with wonderful new features. They think this because they are engineers who thrill to the idea of change. By contrast, Coburn says, "technology is widely hated by its users," because ordinary folk loathe change. Therefore, any new artifact, no matter how much its various features might appeal to technologists, will always be rejected by its intended customers unless "the pain in moving to a new technology is lower than the pain of staying in the status quo."
Or in Pip's geeky formulation:
The Change Function = f (perceived crisis vs. total perceived pain of adoption).
...



from digg.com
Logged
app103
That scary taskbar girl
Charter Honorary Member
***
Posts: 2,718



see users location on a map View Profile WWW Read user's biography. Give some DonationCredits to this forum member
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2006, 10:58:18 AM »

Like my dad said...
Necessity is the mother of invention...
and laziness is it's father.

If you can come up with something lazy people need in order to be more lazy (and yes, we are ALL lazy at heart), and it doesn't require work to use it to be lazier than they already are (it would defeat the purpose if it required work), then it will be successful.

Or if the laziness payoff GREATLY exceeds the work it takes to use it or learn to use it.

laziness payoff - work = new technology's odds of success

And don't forget the cost factor...every $ represents work, too....you had to work to earn it.

Consider the automobile...much less work than walking and carrying your stuff from point A to point B...and much less work than caring for a horse. It was destined to become a success.  Thmbsup


The only other way past the above rule would be to sell your idea to big business and convince them that they need it and that it will save or earn them money, and then rely upon them to force the rest of the world to learn it and use it.

Considering the cost of a computer and what it takes to become computer literate, do you think the majority of us would own one, or even know how to use one, had we not been forced to at some point either by our jobs or by schools? (I said 'majority' because I know there are some real sickos out there that would have done it any way just for fun. tongue)

Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  
   Forum Home   Thread Marks Chat! Downloads Search Login Register  

DonationCoder.com | About Us
DonationCoder.com Forum | Powered by SMF
SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC

social bookmark this page